frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

First Self-Propagating Worm Using Invisible Code Hits OpenVSX and VS Code

https://www.koi.ai/blog/glassworm-first-self-propagating-worm-using-invisible-code-hits-openvsx-m...
1•dnslavin•31s ago•0 comments

[Aristotle], On Trolling (2016)

https://philarchive.org/archive/BARAOT-9
1•aebtebeten•1m ago•0 comments

BofA Warns of Forced Stocks Selling If Credit Problems Persist

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-20/bofa-warns-of-forced-stocks-selling-if-credit-...
2•zerosizedweasle•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: NativeBlend – Text/Image to Editable 3D Models

https://native-blend-app.vercel.app/
1•addy999•8m ago•0 comments

What if AI worked like a forest?

https://worldsensorium.com/what-if-ai-worked-like-a-forest/
1•dnetesn•9m ago•0 comments

More Than a Feeling: How awe and wonder transform science and you

https://nautil.us/more-than-a-feeling-1242661/
1•dnetesn•10m ago•0 comments

Graying Hair May Reflect a Natural Defense Against Cancer Risk

https://www.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/imsut/en/about/press/page_00079.html
1•geox•12m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How Do You Hire?

1•lazaruslong•14m ago•1 comments

Anthropic Sandbox Runtime (Srt)

https://github.com/anthropic-experimental/sandbox-runtime
1•lawrencechen•14m ago•0 comments

How YouTube algorithm manufactures consent

https://archive.org/details/youtube-icw
2•lr0•15m ago•0 comments

Go's experimental Green Tea garbage collector didn't help performance

https://www.dolthub.com/blog/2025-09-26-greentea-gc-with-dolt/
1•PaulHoule•15m ago•0 comments

Nix CI Benchmarks

https://garnix-io.github.io/benchmarks/
2•jkarni•15m ago•0 comments

China has 55% of the high-IQ working-age people

https://sofiechan.com/p/4571
5•speckx•15m ago•0 comments

Cancer patients who got a Covid vaccine lived much longer

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/10/251019120503.htm
1•amichail•15m ago•0 comments

Europe's plan to ditch US tech is built on open source and it's gaining steam

https://www.zdnet.com/article/europes-plan-to-ditch-us-tech-giants-is-built-on-open-source-and-it...
1•CrankyBear•16m ago•0 comments

Halloween video generated for AWS incident

https://scarystories.live/story/aws-cluster-is-down-i-want-t-58f38c/run/2051
2•gmdnn•17m ago•1 comments

OpenEvidence, the ChatGPT for doctors, raises $200M at $6B valuation

https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/20/openevidence-the-chatgpt-for-doctors-raises-200m-at-6b-valuation/
2•brandonb•17m ago•0 comments

Parallel Updates with Homebrew

https://adrg.se/blog/parallel-updates-with-homebrew
1•behnamoh•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tunneling WireGuard over HTTPS Using Wstunnel

https://kroon.email/site/en/posts/wireguard-wstunnel/
1•resill•17m ago•0 comments

Cropple – A Daily image guessing game

https://cropple.app/
2•leonaves•18m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What invention/discovery/event do you want to see in your lifetime?

2•Razengan•18m ago•3 comments

AI Is Killing the Magic

https://www.ft.com/content/d003cdfc-aded-4a9d-9a24-e1aff5261cfa
3•bookofjoe•20m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: As a developer, am I wrong to think monitoring alerts are mostly noise?

3•yansoki•20m ago•6 comments

Beyond the Machine

https://frankchimero.com/blog/2025/beyond-the-machine/
1•FromTheArchives•20m ago•0 comments

LeafTok – AI Reading App – Turn Books into Smart Cards

https://leaftok.github.io/site/
1•lsferreira42•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Every single network-related tool you'll ever need, in one place

https://networking-toolbox.as93.net/
1•lissy93•22m ago•0 comments

AmigaOS 3.3 Ready for Release in 2026

https://www.facebook.com/HyperionEntertainment/posts/amigaos-33-ready-for-release-in-2026earlier-...
1•doener•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Launching Claude Skills Directory

https://claude-skills.directory
1•iosifnicolae2•25m ago•0 comments

Poland's president signs zero income tax law for parents with two children

https://www.euronews.com/2025/10/16/polands-president-signs-off-on-new-zero-income-tax-law-for-pa...
2•tomashertus•28m ago•2 comments

The Trap at 26 Federal Plaza

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/26-federal-plaza-nyc-immigration-court-ice-agents-detainm...
1•KittenInABox•31m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

What I Self Host

https://fredrikmeyer.net/2025/10/18/what-i-self-host.html
49•FredrikMeyer•2h ago

Comments

zahlman•2h ago
There seems to be a fad for "self hosting" things now. What I don't understand is: what happened to just having a single device and having it run the code directly and show you the result directly? For example, why can't the thing that connects to the Spotify API just... do that, from a program that runs locally, independent of a web browser, with a GUI created using a standard non-web GUI toolkit? Why would I want to use it by pointing my browser at a machine name (of another device I own) and port number, rather than by launching a dedicated program?
Semaphor•2h ago
Because most people have multiple devices. I self host about 20 services, that get accessed from 7 different devices for just 2 people.
zeroonetwothree•2h ago
I guess there are a few reasons: easier to develop cross platform, easier to reuse for non-self hosted, easier for programmers familiar with web development to implement, less activation cost for users, less friction to use with multiple devices.
joekrill•2h ago
Most people have many devices: phones, tablets, laptops, etc... so this makes that stuff accessible from anywhere. And if you lose your device, or it dies, you don't lose all your data. On that note: self-hosting allows you to centralize your backups.
zahlman•41m ago
I do have backup storage, of course.

It's hard for me to imagine wanting to use a phone for anything other than making calls or sending SMS; that's what I've been doing for many years now and I see no reason to change. But if I did have a tablet or laptop, I could just sync the program to it and run it locally. Maybe using, for example, good old rsync.

And I can't imagine being away from "home base" on a laptop for long enough (or using it for anything critical enough) to really worry about how to achieve "centralized backups". I'd rather not transmit that data over the Internet when I could just connect the laptop physically to my backup storage when I got home.

juancroldan•2h ago
I guess to avoid having to install such dedicated programs for you and everyone you give access to, or just to have fun coding some little web project
cma•2h ago
You'll need to port that to windows, linux, Mac, android, and ios for a typical device mix of someone doing self-hosting, and no access from more closed platforms that have a browser.
zahlman•38m ago
I can understand Linux programs not being easily made to work on Android, but I can't understand why I'd ever need or want a device that runs Android and a device that runs IOS. Unless they're test devices for development, but I wouldn't be using those to access services in my day-to-day life.
0x01FE•1h ago
Specifically with the Spotify service, the problem with the Spotify API is that you can only request listening data for the last 100 played songs iirc. You can manually request the data from Spotify, but it will take them a month or two to give you the data and it will be a snapshot of it.

So if you want live updates on statistics about your listening habits you need a service running 24/7 querying the Spotify API and storing the information in a database. Assumedly since most people don't have a computer to run this on 24/7, a server is necessary / preferred.

I've actually written an application doing something similar, it's very annoying that Spotify's API works like this.

ekjhgkejhgk•1h ago
I think people don't know what they want, but they like fiddling with computers. So, they imagine future scenarios where they would have problems (which they don't) and imagine solutions for those problems they don't have, and spend time implementing those solutions.

For example. Whenever RSS comes up, I say that newsboat is the best thing. People don't like it because it doesn't synchronize devices. Really? Why not have a device for reading, and read there? I have newsboat on my laptop and I A) don't have to read on my phone, B) can't read on my phone, and C) don't have to spend my free time doing unpaid maintenance for a job which I created for myself. Win-win-win.

npodbielski•1h ago
Maybe for some. But for me I do not want giant corp own my data. Like I do give keys to my house to some company or I do not have people manage my own money. Just as a principle.
npodbielski•1h ago
Others already answered with information that you usually have more devices then just 1. So you can have access to your data from PC, laptop and your phone. I for once also like to have my own data my own. I.e. I have:

- my own email server

- my own files sharing service

- service for cardDav, CalDav etc.

- service for editing my own office files on mobile

- notes that are synchronized

- streaming of movies and music

- build and git server

- my own smart home service

- notification service

- chat

- VPN

- desktop sharing service

- my own DNS for blocking adds

- and others

leosanchez•47m ago
Can you list out the names of services?
teddyh•2h ago
I deplore this weakening and dilution of the term “self-hosting”. In my opinion, if your services had downtime today, you are not “self-hosting”. If you depend on anything which has “cloud” in its name, you are not “self-hosting”. If you cannot reasonably quickly access your hardware physically, like inserting or replacing an add-on card, you are not “self-hosting”.

EDIT: It’s like saying “I don’t take the bus! I ‘self-drive’ my own car! (By which I mean that I employ an agency to provide a driver to drive a car for me, which I rent!)” or “I self-grow and self-harvest all my own food! By which I mean that I pay a farmer to grow food and harvest it for me.”

Words have meaning.

(Further: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21240357>)

pdav•2h ago
I think I actually agree with you but the modern definition of the term is more akin to "I own my data" than "I own my own hardware." It's a big tent and it's nice to see people taking an interest in ownership!
teddyh•2h ago
I have seen the term “data sovereignty” used occasionally.
rpdillon•2h ago
What do you call what the author is doing?
teddyh•2h ago
It would be good if there was a nice, simple, positive word for it; people might not feel the need to appropriate “self-host” otherwise. Unfortunately, I don’t know of any.
rpdillon•2h ago
I asked because I used the term self-host for both my services that I run on a VPS I rent from Dreamhost, as well as services that I host on my homelab and expose over tailscale. I don't have a good set of terminology to differentiate between the two, so I call both of them self-hosting. I was a bit surprised you felt so strongly about it.
walterbell•1h ago
Self-admin
pessimizer•1h ago
The same thing that somebody who clicked "install wordpress" in cPANEL did. They're installing software on a rented server hosted by a company that they rent from.
rpdillon•1h ago
It would also include the situation where there was a bare metal server you installed your own operating system on it and then wrote your own software and then deployed it to that server. The argument being made is that's not self-hosting. That makes me wonder what it should be called.
CaptainOfCoit•2h ago
If you haven't picked together the hardware for your home server at home, can you really say that you're self-hosting? Or if you haven't really built the components yourself, are you actually self-hosting? If you cannot reasonably quickly debug your hardware faults physically, you're not "self-hosting".

It seems everyone draws the line of "self-hosting" differently. For some, "self-hosting" could be running Wordpress at DigitalOcean. For others, self-hosting means using your residential internet connection and having the hardware at home. I'm not sure one is more "correct" than the other, just different perspectives.

teddyh•2h ago
> [Paraphrased] Words mean different things to different people! Anyone can choose any definition they want!

No, words have quite definite meanings. Otherwise, they are not an aid to communication.

CaptainOfCoit•2h ago
How is tributes to lords from vassals related to communication? Oh wait, you didn't mean that meaning of the word "aid"? But words only have one meaning...
latexr•2h ago
> No, words have quite definite meanings.

Were that the case, “literally” would not literally mean both itself and its opposite.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/misuse-of-literally

Words change meaning frequently throughout history, depending on how they are (mis)used. Or they can change meaning depending on context or part of the country/world.

https://www.vox.com/2015/11/29/9806038/great-british-baking-...

Sometimes drastically.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/kc41mu/why_...

> Otherwise, they are not an aid to communication.

I do agree with you that it makes it harder, but communication does depend on more than just the words.

voakbasda•1h ago
Literally not meaning literally is literally an example of the enshitification of language.
latexr•1h ago
> the enshitification of language

Good example of words losing their meaning. “Enshittification” is barely an infant as a word and it has a very specific meaning, but people are already using to mean “something I dislike”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

latexr•2h ago
That seems ripe for an alternative version of the popular “loops to goat farming” quote:

> I thought using loops was cheating, so I programmed my own using samples. I then thought using samples was cheating, so I recorded real drums. I then thought that programming it was cheating, so I learned to play drums for real. I then thought using bought drums was cheating, so I learned to make my own. I then thought using premade skins was cheating, so I killed a goat and skinned it. I then thought that that was cheating too, so I grew my own goat from a baby goat. I also think that is cheating, but I’m not sure where to go from here. I haven’t made any music lately, what with the goat farming and all.

dsr_•2h ago
Meanwhile, that person learned the valuable skills of programming loops, recording, playing, and making drums, and goat farming; I suspect they may be happier doing some of those things than making music from other people's loops, which is where they started.

I bet they met a bunch of interesting people along the way.

herpdyderp•2h ago
I think this application of the term still makes sense. There are several services I use that I can "self host" for free or pay for the service's "cloud" option. Whether I "self host" on my own hardware or not isn't relevant to the term in that use case.
jamesbelchamber•2h ago
Real self-hosters use butterflies
lordnacho•2h ago
It's a spectrum that has been illuminated by time. In the old times you had to do all these. Now you can cut this somewhere:

- Power + cooling, physical security, network. (Old school LAN party)

- Can you access the bare metal OS? (Hetzner/OVH bare metal)

- Can you access a VM and decide what runs on it? (EC2 + associated services, K8s, etc, etc)

- Can you run a function? (Lambda for example)

So the meaning has wandered to something between the first and second, IMO.

teddyh•2h ago
The meaning has only “wandered” due to the marketing of dishonest hosting companies, and their partially self-deluded customers who want to believe the marketing in order to avoid doing the hard work of actually self-hosting.
lordnacho•2h ago
I'm not so sure. Software people have a tendency towards abstraction, and often the bottom layer in their opinion of their own role is where you have OS control, without knowing much about the network and physical.

Whether that's reasonable, well, I kinda liked the underlayer and thought it was part of a good education. But not everyone agrees.

pessimizer•1h ago
There is no such thing as "bare metal OS." Metal is hardware, and an OS is an abstraction over hardware that restricts the software's access to it.
Semaphor•2h ago
The meaning is I install my own software and set up as I want. Some of it on my 2 mini servers in my living room, some (prosody and seafile) on a VPS. Calling the latter not self hosted seems weird to me.
latexr•1h ago
> The meaning is I install my own software and set up as I want.

That seems a bit vague. If you tell that to someone who never heard of self-hosting, they’d be excused for wondering if that means downloading from an App Store and opening the settings.

Semaphor•1h ago
I'd expand on it of my audience weren't HN ;)

Though I guess I missed "on a server"

latexr•1h ago
> I'd expand on it of my audience weren't HN ;)

Fair! Not everyone on HN is a programmer, but there is overrepresentation.

> Though I guess I missed "on a server"

Yes, that’s what I was thinking was missing.

dooglius•2h ago
How do you define it? If your ISP has a problem, you can't access that hardware physically, so it would seem this definition rules out anyone that doesn't control an ISP.
teddyh•2h ago
This is a common, but disingenuous, objection. People also don’t make their own electricity. Is therefore “self-host” an unreachable goal, which nobody can fulfill in practice? No, this would be a useless definition.
dooglius•53m ago
I agree that that's a bad definition, that's my point. The question is how _you_ are defining it since your definition seems to have this problem; if you're going to complain about others' use of the term you should indicate what you think the term should mean!
turtlebits•1h ago
The word "host" is ambigious. Hosts can be virtual or physical.

Self-host to me is a verb, which mean you're running the service, regardless of what hardware it's on. On-prem is better descriptive word for physical hardware.

QuantumNomad_•1h ago
I rent a couple of bare-metal servers from Hetzner, and I have physical servers at home.

On my home hardware I keep things like multiple copies of my photos and documents, as well as experimenting a bit with open LLMs etc.

On the rented servers, I host websites, PeerTube, Forgejo, and keep copies of some data I downloaded from elsewhere.

I’ve also previously hosted email on rented servers. Both on rented hardware and on rented VPSes. For the past few years I haven’t bothered with hosting email myself. I use iCloud provided email instead.

Sometimes I upload videos to my PeerTube instance. Sometimes I upload videos to TikTok.

I don’t have some grand vision of self-hosting everything at home. It is impractical, and comes with its own set of drawbacks. Things that only serve myself and my family go on my hardware at home. Things that I want others to be able to reach go on the rented servers. And other times like with email and TikTok I use services where I have no control whatsoever over what the service provider does with my data.

If someone decides that a particular service is neat to host on rented servers I won’t fault them for it. And I consider things that you manage on your own to be self-hosted even if you don’t own the hardware it’s running on.

You decided to rent a $5 VPS for your email? You’ll still learn things from that even if the server is not in your home. And I will perfectly agree that it fits the name self-hosted email. Same goes for anything else you set up and manage, regardless of whether it’s running on bare metal or in a VPS, and regardless of whether the computer it runs on is in your home or rented from someone else.

teddyh•1h ago
> If someone decides that a particular service is neat to host on rented servers I won’t fault them for it.

Neither will I. It is an endeavor worthy of praise.

> And I consider things that you manage on your own to be self-hosted even if you don’t own the hardware it’s running on.

This is where I will disagree and stand fast. If you do not “host” it yourself, you are not “self-hosting”. You might be maintaining it. You might be administrating it. But you are not hosting it.

> You decided to rent a $5 VPS for your email? You’ll still learn things from that even if the server is not in your home.

I agree, and it is certainly something I wish that more people would attempt.

> And I will perfectly agree that it fits the name self-hosted email.

It may be said to be “self-administrated” or “self-maintained”. But it is not “self-hosted”.

tallanvor•1h ago
If I self-host at home and my internet connection goes down so I can't access anything remotely, then I'm still SOL until I can get home. And millions of people are stuck with crappy upload speeds that make plenty of services that they may want to self-host nonviable if they care about being able to access it from anywhere.

Yes, words have meaning, but most of us will happily disagree with your definition of self-hosting.

teddyh•1h ago
What you describe is an unfortunate result of the terrible bandwith situation at your (and others’) location. It is not, however, a compelling argument to redefine a term to suit your liking.

(Also, with 4G, 5G, and satellite-based Internet, an alternate (albeit low-bandwith) route for emergency access is fairly straightforward to set up.)

belorn•49m ago
Reminds me of self sufficiency farming. If you grow your own food you will be impacted by the yield of that farm, rather than going to the supermarket and buy the food there. If the soil is bad then it might be difficult to impossible to do self sufficiency farming.
FabCH•1h ago
There is a middle ground there. I self-host, was not at all affected today nor would I be if Google, MS, Cloudfare or any of the big ones go down. But I cannot easily access my server because it is locked in a datacenter 1000 km away.

But it is a bare metal server from Hetzner auction that I got for cheap and it now hosts an entire family&friends cloud for 10-ish people.

pessimizer•1h ago
A host is someone who lets people stay in their house. "Self-hosting" and "bare-metal" have gotten debased in such a strange, commercial-marketing aligned way.

The new definition of "self-hosting" is that you play any part in a piece of software that you use (if I click the "install wordpress button in cPANEL, am I self-hosting?), and the new definition of "bare-metal" is "computer." It's just weird. How can you employ a webhost in order to self-host? How can it be bare-metal if it's hosted within an OS that completely abstracts the hardware?

I suspect non-technical people just wanted to fluff their qualifications, and the companies who host for them wanted to help.

pluto_modadic•1h ago
self-hosting: running open source code that you could run on any computer.

if it's convenient to run mastodon on hetzner, that's STILL self hosting; because you /can/ move your app IN ITS ENTIRETY from any computer to any other.

HomeLab elites really are the most insufferable people out there.

AndyMcConachie•1h ago
I rent VPS's in a data center and run services on them. I feel like I'm self-hosting. The days of me running a server in my own home are long gone. I don't want to deal with the power requirements, the noise, or the hardware.

I'm responsible for all the software that runs on them so I consider it self hosting.

Gud•47m ago
As someone who self hosts in a VPN, I agree with you. :-)

I did self host on my own hardware for a long, long time. But convenience won.

I had built myself a massive beast. A Xeon board I had purchased cheaply for $200 bucks from a friend. I put a water cooler(OEM from Intel) and clocked that sob from 2.6GHz to 4GHz. I quickly clocked it down back to 2.6GHz. It never hit temperatures above 30 again.

I installed 24GB RAM, which was the maximum. I installed it in a 3U chassi with the max possible 3.5” hot swap slots. I think 16?

I used FreeBSD with ZFS to run a bhyve virtualisation platform. It was a lot of fun.

lpln3452•27m ago
Some may lament that 'writing' now includes typing, despite having been limited to pen and paper. Frankly it's doubtful that point is taken seriously.

Similarly the core of your 'self-farming' analogy is the direct management of the crops. The involvement of others in demolishing existing structures, erecting fences, or managing water resources on the land is of little consequence.

Of course, some might argue that unless the farm is directly managed, it does not constitute self-farming.

leshokunin•2h ago
Self hosting is great. The examples in this article are not exactly shining examples: an API that shows your Spotify stats?

If we’re going to talk about self hosting music, I’d like to mention Roon, which is loved by audiophiles. It aims at creating a magazine like experience for navigating and discovering music. Been using it since COVID and it’s completely transformed my experience of listening to something else than the same playlist over and over.

FredrikMeyer•2h ago
Thanks for the tip! I run these things mostly for fun - the Spotify stats thing isn't super useful, but it is fun to look at how my listening habits have changed over the years.

It slightly more than just an API though: one can't aggregate directly from the Spotify API.

sh3rl0ck•2h ago
The fact that it's a subscription is slightly off putting.

Loved the UI photos, but I guess I'll continue with Navidrome + Feishin/Symfonium.

throwaway270925•1h ago
How is this Roon selfhosting when its 14,99€/m? Isnt this just another Streaming Service?
hunter2_•1h ago
I'm not super familiar, but it looks like you're subscribing to Roon's metadata but it's "bring your own music" (to quote their FAQ) which can be files you self-host and/or supported music streaming services (which don't include Roon) that you subscribe to separately.
npodbielski•1h ago
I like listening to the same playlist over an over. Magazine for music? I would like to have time for magazines. But it would be about electronic and RC-models.
busymom0•2h ago
> I pay for a cheap droplet at DigitalOcean, about $5 per month, and an additional dollar for backup.

Wait, I thought self hosting meant having your own hardware at like home running all your services. Not DigitalOcean.

rpdillon•2h ago
I didn't realize, but apparently this is a long-standing argument. I did just a tiny bit of digging because I'm sort of into self-hosting and I ran across the selfhosted Reddit's wiki on the topic.

https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/wiki/selfhosted

TLDR: they don't differentiate on whether you own the hardware or not.

hunter2_•1h ago
Basically it sounds like IaaS is fine (even though someone else manages the hardware and restricts OS choices), and even PaaS is fine (even though someone else manages the hardware, the OS, and the configuration of interpreters such as php / node.js / python / etc.), since these let you run your own code (which can include your instance of community code). Only SaaS would be excluded, as these don't let you run your own code.
pluto_modadic•1h ago
IaaS VPS's and rented colo VMs are definitely fine. PaaS is... slightly not? it's the grey edge!

SaaS is definitely not you running stuff you control or could move anywhere.

If it's a buck standard linux box, yeah that's self hosting!

tallanvor•1h ago
There is always going to be a point of failure. For many of us, self-hosting on a dedicated server, VPS, or some sort of cloud service is much better than keeping the hardware to do it at home.

My stuff is spread out among a dedicated server and 3 VPS's. --I could and should drop one of the VPS's, but if it'll take me a couple of hours, it's just not worth it until I actually have the time to spare.

npodbielski•51m ago
It depends of your needs and resources of course but you can keep in some drawer or basement some old or small PC and you basically do not have to spend money on this, but for paid servers you have to spend 20-50$/month for something sensible. 1tb of backup in some s3 service costs like 120$ per year, and 1TB is not that much. In reality paid servers will be close to 1k$/year and in that price you can have sensible machine.
quest88•2h ago
I’ve also been thinking of the product manual idea. I’ll subscribe to your rss and see if you beat me to it.
tempfile•1h ago
Very happy to learn about the Grafana Strava plugin. I have been worried about that data for a while!
hk1337•1h ago
Linkding is really nice. I have a bunch of bookmark shortcuts saved that I still need to import into it.
craftkiller•1h ago
I've taken this one step further: I self-host archivebox which is basically a self-hosted wayback machine. That way my bookmarks are immune to articles being taken down / moved / modified.
ekjhgkejhgk•1h ago
How come everything is "opinionated" these days, and since when has that become a compliment? I don't want software to have opinions, I want it to do what I tell it.
wltr•1h ago
Write your own then, I guess. I prefer a developer to have at least some basic understanding of what they’re developing and why. And when they do, and when they themselves use their product, they do have opinions. In my opinion, especially if the project is open source, you’re free to do as you like.

I like opinionated software, because usually the developer uses the software themselves, and they prefer to not have some features you might like. I’m fine with that, if our opinions are similar. If not, I just might ignore that software, I guess. Sure thing, we cannot make all software opinionated, there’s no point in that. But some of it, I enjoy it to be that way.

zahlman•25m ago
> I don't want software to have opinions, I want it to do what I tell it.

What you tell it can be ambiguous or underspecified. "Opinionated" refers to the decisions the software makes so that you don't have to. Sometimes it also refers to having a default configuration that most users would find acceptable (but which can still be modified).

doublerabbit•1h ago
Just wait until folk hear about colocation.

Been colocating for 10 years now, the best of both worlds.

mathieudombrock•1h ago
For what it's worth, I wrote a very bare bones RSS reader in an afternoon. It really just renders a set of RSS feeds into HTML and nothing else.

But it was fun to and educational to build and could pretty easily be extended to add more features.

I would recommend just going for it if you are interested in writing one. It's not as hard as it sounds.