Naively, one of those things is not like the others.
When I run into things like this, I just stop reading. My assumption is that a keyword is being thrown in for grant purposes. Who knows what other aspects of reality have been subordinated to politics by the writer.
axus•3mo ago
baxtr•3mo ago
Take building a viable company. You know that many people have solved this. But you also know that 9/10 fail.
So you need the time and the money to try enough times to make it work.
djdjdhdh•3mo ago
stonemetal12•3mo ago
fhuteedc•3mo ago
https://clarifycapital.com/blog/what-percentage-of-businesse...
That 80% number is after 20 years. That's far longer than almost anyone stays at the same employer. Maybe if those failures are the owners retiring.
You're being lied to. The myths of silicon Valley are not there for the benefit of founders.
shermantanktop•3mo ago
That may not apply to a building a viable company directly. It might suggest that new companies should avoid replicating elements of failed companies.
LPisGood•3mo ago
mcmoor•3mo ago
Nevermark•3mo ago
My mind was so familiar with all the constraints, all I had to know was that there was a solution and I knew exactly where it had to be.
But before knowing there was a solution I hadn't realized that.
truelson•3mo ago
paulorlando•3mo ago
NooneAtAll3•3mo ago
343 is 7 cubed, so just call it "cube barrier!" and it becomes a worthy challenge
mpalmer•3mo ago
NooneAtAll3•3mo ago
mcmoor•3mo ago