"This other genocide is worse" isn't the amazing insight you think it is.

> even though it is far worse than anything alleged in the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Hmm. I don't see how this contributes anything, and the two atrocities are linked.

So yes, news about Israel are more engaging in the US.

It is one thing to read of atrocities commited in an extremely underdeveloped country and another to hear of even notionally smaller ones in an extremely developed one.

I think it's important to raise awareness, and do whatever we can to oppose this sort of activity, but what is your source for this claim specifically?

I have been unable to find any substantiating information that US is supplying weapons, or aide of any kind, to the Rapid Support Forces of Sudan.

Based on where most modern AK manufacturing has moved to (China, like manufacturing writ large), you should instead be asking the Chinese populous to protest. That said, I wouldn't hold my breath on China forming a mass protest culture any time soon, Tiananmen Square is in most people's living memory.

Because sovereign states demanded that it would be an empty shell, and this was accepted because otherwise there would be nothing.

For example, the ICC. Nobody can be convicted by the ICC unless their country allows it. And even that is going too far for essentially all countries, even founding member states like South Africa (who explicitly went against UN treaties they signed to protect Al-Bashir and Putin)