frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Notes for February 2-7

https://taoofmac.com/space/notes/2026/02/07/2000
2•rcarmo•1m ago•0 comments

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/07/boomers_vs_zoomers_workplace/
1•Willingham•8m ago•0 comments

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

https://lauriepenny.substack.com/p/the-big-hunger
1•shervinafshar•9m ago•0 comments

The Genus Amanita

https://www.mushroomexpert.com/amanita.html
1•rolph•14m ago•0 comments

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

https://shattered.io/
1•mooreds•15m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

1•Buttons840•16m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

1•pinkmuffinere•17m ago•0 comments

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01815
1•walterbell•22m ago•0 comments

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67747-9
1•PaulHoule•24m ago•0 comments

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

https://www.wsj.com/world/india/why-big-tech-is-throwing-cash-into-india-in-quest-for-ai-supremac...
1•saikatsg•24m ago•0 comments

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

https://github.com/aweussom/HowToShootYourselfInTheFoot
1•aweussom•24m ago•0 comments

Eight More Months of Agents

https://crawshaw.io/blog/eight-more-months-of-agents
3•archb•26m ago•0 comments

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-digital-self/202602/from-human-thought-to-machine-coo...
1•walterbell•26m ago•0 comments

The new X API pricing must be a joke

https://developer.x.com/
1•danver0•27m ago•0 comments

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

https://rma-dashboard.bukhari-kibuka7.workers.dev/
1•bumahkib7•28m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

https://github.com/2015xli/jqassistant-graph-rag
1•artigent•33m ago•0 comments

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

https://mccue.dev/pages/2-6-26-python-competitor
4•dragandj•34m ago•0 comments

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

https://www.mauriciopoppe.com/notes/tmux-to-zellij/
1•maurizzzio•35m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

1•otterley•36m ago•0 comments

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

https://signoz.io/blog/otel-baggage/
1•pranay01•37m ago•0 comments

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

https://davmail.sourceforge.net/
1•todsacerdoti•38m ago•0 comments

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

https://github.com/sqlmodel/sqlmodel
1•Sean766•40m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

https://github.com/chinonsochikelue/tharos
1•fluantix•40m ago•0 comments

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

https://simonsafar.com/2024/win32_lights/
1•MaximilianEmel•40m ago•0 comments

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

https://www.ibli.com/IBLI%20OnePagers%20The%20Plays%20Summarized.pdf
1•mooreds•41m ago•1 comments

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

https://donuts20.vercel.app
1•sngahane•42m ago•0 comments

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/06/onecourt-tactile-device-super-bowl-blind-low-vision-fans/
1•gaws•44m ago•0 comments

Rudolf Vrba

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vrba
1•mooreds•44m ago•0 comments

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/119747
1•paulpauper•45m ago•0 comments

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

https://aurio.place/
1•cherrylinedev•46m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Apple Mini Apps Partner Program

https://developer.apple.com/programs/mini-apps-partner/
117•soheilpro•2mo ago

Comments

daeken•2mo ago
> A qualifying mini app within the Mini Apps Partner Program is one that’s put out by a person or entity that’s not directly or indirectly controlled by you, nor under common control with you.

I don't understand; if it's put out by someone else, how do I participate?

paxys•2mo ago
You are the developer of an app. A "mini app" is content created by a 3rd party that you import into your app.

The linked program ("Mini Apps Partner") is for you, not for the developer of the mini app.

pdpi•2mo ago
As I understand it: Your app is a virtual arcade, that supports “mini app” arcade games published by other developers, that run inside your virtual cabinet.

I make a game for your arcade, and players pay cash to add credits to my game.

The status quo: Player pays £1, Apple takes their 30% cut, you get 70p, take another 30% cut, and give me 49p

What this programme entails: player pays £1, Apple takes a 15% cut, you get 85p, and hopefully pass on some of that extra money to me too.

The gotchas are:

1. it has to be your app and my mini game. This is about lightening the load of all the intermediaries, not about you cheesing an extra 15%

2. It has to be the player buying credits for my game specifically. If you sell “ArcadeBux” redeemable for credits on any game at your arcade, you’re not an intermediary, you’re the vendor.

ChrisMarshallNY•2mo ago
I have not had a chance (or, frankly, the desire) to read the full Ts&Cs, but I wouldn't be surprised if you (as an app host), will shoulder some of the accountability for bad mini-apps.
wahnfrieden•2mo ago
You must submit all the apps for review.
bradly•2mo ago
Roblox model.
jasongill•2mo ago
This article explains this new program for those (like me) who had no idea what a "mini app" was and why it matters: https://www.macrumors.com/2025/11/13/apple-announces-mini-ap...

tldr: it will let Apple charge a commission (although at 15%, it's half the normal 30% rate for the app store) on popular web app games embedded in to WeChat for the Chinese market

JimDabell•2mo ago
> although at 15%, it's half the normal 30% rate for the app store

15% is the normal rate for the App Store. Only developers earning above $1MM/yr through the App Store have to pay 30%, the vast majority of developers only pay 15%.

jasongill•2mo ago
I assume WeChat is above the $1m/yr threshold
wahnfrieden•2mo ago
It's not "normal", you have to "apply" (and get auto-accepted) but won't get the rate if you don't know to do that. You'll also get permanently booted from it if you do some things like transfer ownership of an account (if you want to sell an app you made, IIRC you lose access to this program, even if the app makes under a million).
x0x0•2mo ago
This is a partnership the same way restaurants "partner" with the mob.
jamesgeck0•2mo ago
Mini apps are way more than web games. For a lot of people in China, WeChat is effectively their operating system. The platform hosts _millions_ of mini apps covering a significant percentage of the use cases that a mobile developer elsewhere in the world might build a native app for.

As such, it seems like WeChat has historically gotten away with a lot of stuff kinda sorta on the edge of the policies that Apple enforces on everyone else.

wyre•2mo ago
It seems like this might be Apple’s attempt at a version of alternative app stores, locked down by strict T&Cs.

I opened up the comments hoping to see discussion amongst the people here with strong feelings about Apple’s walled garden, but it seems I’m too early to the party.

yen223•2mo ago
Maybe I'm cynical, but what I'm wondering is which country's regulation led to Apple being forced to do this
wahnfrieden•2mo ago
Apple is going to profit tremendously off this. They did it in part because they will make billions from WeChat.
xeonmc•2mo ago
And Roblox
chronciger•2mo ago
> Maybe I'm cynical, but what I'm wondering is which country's regulation led to Apple being forced to do this

Not Europe, that’s for sure.

Most likely American “regulation” via cutthroat capitalism and attempt to copy WeChat’s success.

nandomrumber•2mo ago
Isn’t this what competition is supposed to like?
riffraff•2mo ago
How's this competition if it's still using apple's payment infrastructure in apps that are shipped via apple's app store?
brazukadev•2mo ago
Yes. You'll own nothing and be happy /s
wahnfrieden•2mo ago
Yes but it is also a grab at WeChat, forcing them to transact through Apple with a new 15% cut
JimDabell•2mo ago
It’s also a grab at Grab, who just announced their mini apps a couple of weeks ago:

https://www.grab.com/sg/press/others/grab-launches-third-par...

nandomrumber•2mo ago
Shouldn’t we presume that Grab was aware of any upcoming changes.

I think they call it commercial in confidence.

Grab would have voluntarily entered in to an agreement with Apple.

Are we ok with companies reaching an agreement to do business together on terms of their mutual agreement still?

Aperocky•2mo ago
Apparently, the apps in wechat aren't transacted via Apple today anyways, maybe some will choose to do so via apple but I can't imagine to be the majority.

I also think wechat have the upper hand in this relationship so Apple is unlikely to be able to do any real forcing function.

nandomrumber•2mo ago
Presumably Tencent voluntarily entered in to a contract with Apple.

What’s this forced business?

wahnfrieden•2mo ago
k
JumpCrisscross•2mo ago
> seems like this might be Apple’s attempt at a version of alternative app stores, locked down by strict T&Cs

Huh, I read it as them reüsing the code and contracts they built to partner with Tencent.

wyre•2mo ago
Could be. I’m not familiar with their Tencent contracts.
JumpCrisscross•2mo ago
“Apple has reached a new agreement with Tencent that will allow the company to process payments and collect a 15% commission on purchases made inside WeChat mini games and mini apps on the iPhone, establishing a major new revenue stream in China after over a year of negotiations, according to Bloomberg.”

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/11/13/apple-deal-to-take-bill...

wyre•2mo ago
Oh ya, there's no way this isn't an extension of those agreements with Tencent.
polyomino•2mo ago
Forcing iPad support seems like tying. I wonder if this will finally get Instagram to release an iPad app.
havaloc•2mo ago
They already did : https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/instagram-finally-gave-us-an-...
wahnfrieden•2mo ago
I expect this is also setting up for MCP marketplaces.

There was evidence of upcoming macOS and iOS updates adding MCP support at a system level across apps. The rules talk about "scripts", not only games or apps.

https://9to5mac.com/2025/09/22/macos-tahoe-26-1-beta-1-mcp-i...

modeless•2mo ago
Roblox still exempt, blatant favoritism continues
Jaxkr•2mo ago
Roblox pays the full 30%.
modeless•2mo ago
Only for in app purchases of Robux. They are uniquely allowed to distribute their own app store (not based on HTML/JS applets) within the App Store, which is against the terms that every other Apple developer agrees to. And they are allowed to use a virtual currency that can be obtained elsewhere without an Apple Tax to pay for digital goods purchases inside an iOS app, bypassing the IAP system, again against the terms.
benatkin•2mo ago
Another thing this is similar to is Google AMP, which provided predictible user experiences through heavy restrictions. I guess AMP is to Mini Apps what Google Glass is to Oculus.
nandomrumber•2mo ago
Try to find some high tensile analogies.

These ones are looking a little strained.

jim201•2mo ago
No excitement here for any “discount” announcements—just cynicism about our device freedoms being restricted by two duopolies.
lanna•2mo ago
A duopoly
Cockbrand•2mo ago
GP maybe meant EU + US in addition to the obvious Apple + Google?
fsflover•2mo ago
Or MS + Apple on desktop.
mappu•2mo ago
Telegram have a big mini-apps platform.

Chatbots are a major area to regulate. I don't see how it would be possible for Telegram (or Discord, or IRC clients...) to comply with this.

leche•2mo ago
Commoditizing Roblox and keeping payments inhouse. Smart idea