Sounds like the perfect use case for some sort of Orbital Express service, delivering (say) 10kg to LEO for a flat $250,000. That should be plenty, for a space capsule window repair kit.
Unfortunately, the economies of scale for an OrbEx just aren't there yet.
fspeech•2mo ago
A human rated vehicle would be much more expensive than one rated for cargo. And there are not many use cases for the vehicle other than rescue missions to the two space stations.
bell-cot•2mo ago
I was proposing a drone-style delivery, of a small repair kit, for the damaged window on the Chinese spacecraft that is currently docked at their Tiangong space station.
Their astronauts don't need rescue. Nor a human delivery driver to chat with.
If a "10kg to (& from?) LEO for $250,000 flat rate" OrbEx service existed, 99% of the initial use cases would be launching cubesats. After a while, some LEO satellites might be designed to use it for additional reaction mass and other stuff. Space stations could use it for time-sensitive scientific supplies and zero-g manufacturing specimens, and an occasional priority repair part.
fspeech•2mo ago
I don't think the repair could be done. It's not about plugging a hole in space. It's about surviving reentry. They can't guarantee the integrity of the glass. Anyway to your point they could stock the kits in space on regular supply missions, which again diminishes the utility of express delivery.
bell-cot•2mo ago
Unfortunately, the economies of scale for an OrbEx just aren't there yet.
fspeech•2mo ago
bell-cot•2mo ago
Their astronauts don't need rescue. Nor a human delivery driver to chat with.
If a "10kg to (& from?) LEO for $250,000 flat rate" OrbEx service existed, 99% of the initial use cases would be launching cubesats. After a while, some LEO satellites might be designed to use it for additional reaction mass and other stuff. Space stations could use it for time-sensitive scientific supplies and zero-g manufacturing specimens, and an occasional priority repair part.
fspeech•2mo ago