This isnt the failure of the law, its the failure of humans to understand the abstraction.

Programmers should absolutely understand when theyre using a high level abstraction to a complex problem.

Its bemusing when you seem them actively ignore that and claim the abstraction is broken rather than the underlying problem is simply more complex and the abstraction is for 95% of use cases.

"Aha," the confused programmer exclaims, "the abstraction is wrong, I can still shoot my foot off when i disable the gun safety"

If you tether it to an asphalt ground hook you can claim it’s a tarmac and that it’s “parked” for sake of the FAA. You’ll need a “lighter-than-air” certification.

You can see why the LLM companies are overly cautious around any topics that are destined to weaponized against them.

Also, I'm eager to see how well gpt-oss-120b gets uncensored if it really was using the phi-5 approach, since that seems fundamentally difficult given the training.

All “alignment” is extremely shallow, thus the general ease of jailbreaks.

Ablation in post isn't good enough - it usually does 10% of "expunge the data you want expunged", 70% of "make the data you want expunged less accessible", and 20% of "collateral damage". Training for refusals doesn't damage the capabilities much - it just make them harder to access. If someone has access to model weights, neither holds. GPT-OSS was SOTA at removing unwanted capabilities, and even that didn't hold for long.

Now, dataset curation/filtration does help against select capabilities. But a lot of capabilities are double edged, and can't be deleted without hurting performance at the task you want.

If an AI is good at coming up with novel ways to perform chemical synthesis, it can be reused to come up with pathways for synthesizing illegal drugs or poisons, no way around that. If an AI is good at writing software, it can be reused for writing malware. If an AI is good at autonomously finding vulnerabilities in your own network, it can be reused to do the same in some other dude's network.

AI may have an alignment, but raw capabilities sure don't.

As has been pointed out elsewhere, sota models probably are now better trained than this, it would probably be hard to use this dataset on Claude to get it to stop refusing.