First result today:
"President Trump Shares Story About His Brother’s Alcohol Addiction" https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q9yJSjdp_go&
Then why are they selling beer pong with the presidential seal on it?
Trump Vodka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Vodka :
> The brand was launched in the United States in 2005, but ceased production under the Trump name in 2011 when it failed to meet the required threshold for distribution. However, it is still sold (in 2016) in Israel, especially around the Jewish holiday of Passover.[2]
Trump Vodka is made from potatoes.
Trump Vodka is sold in a gold-plated glass bottle that can't be recycled.
> Trump Vodka started being sold unofficially in Israel by H. Pixel International based on a signed deal with Drinks Americas, but Trump brought a lawsuit against the company for copyright infringement, as they did not have his agreement to use his image in advertising or the brand. [10][11]
So, they seem to understand likeness and name rights.
Did they have knowledge of right and wrong at the time of the offense?
Did not veto the recriminalization of canbabis.
Free booze parties on our tab, sells alcohol, says they never drink, brother has a problem; has no interim plan for medical cannabis patients that they're intending to intentionally deny rights to unequally without an authorizing amendment.
Aren't they sabotaging the medication and health of medical cannabis patients unequally and unconstitutionally? What about Equal Protection of Equal Rights, Natural Rights, and Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness?
These oligarchs want 1991 Russia and have been / are working with Hungary / Orban as a testing ground
I'm not sure what to say about Manafort, Yanukovich, and Trump.
Looks like Bannon and Epstein were acquainted as well.
Tried to make the cover more authentic to really capture the spirit of the Trump administration.
There is no general prohibition about using the seal of the United States. It is only violating these provisions when you use it in a way where a reasonable person would believe it is being endorsed by the United States government.
Clearly based upon the insanity in these comments no one believes that these things are actually endorsed by the government they're just upset at Trump and they're upset at the usage of the seal. Not liking it doesn't violate the law you actually believing that these things are somehow part of the federal government would. As you all represent reasonable people and clearly don't believe this including the author of this article it's just this vague threat that it could violate the law.
If you want it to violate the law you're going to have to be a lot dumber than you actually are or find a bunch of dumber people. Then you would have a case where you could show that these reasonably dumb people believe these are things from our federal government.
Your feelings about something aren't what matters. Try and set them aside.
stopbulying•2mo ago
Great Seal of the United States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Seal_of_the_United_State...
Seal of the president of the United States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_of_the_president_of_the_U...
Bender•2mo ago
I suspect Pam will not do anything but the next administration certainly could.
CamperBob2•2mo ago
Those who voted for this are bad people who should feel bad.
jshier•2mo ago
elmerfud•2mo ago
If the reasonable person would not consider it to be something by the federal government then you are totally allowed to use it. It is one of the consequences of free speech and having a public government. Because this doesn't fall under normal trademark law or even a normal copyright.
So it very much becomes a question for the courts to answer. People's political bias doesn't factor into it. The courts measurement of a reasonable person standard is what does.