The article doesn't appear to take a side one way or the other in the conflict, it's just listing a potential compliance issue.
> the program was found to be quietly invasive as it allows the installer to install programs on the user’s device without permission. It circumvents the user validation process and successfully bypasses multiple security checks, including antivirus programs
I agree that the headline “controversy” is manufactured.
> The presence of an Israeli-origin technology component on Samsung phones in WANA countries poses additional problems. Several nations in this region legally bar Israeli companies from operating, and in light of the ongoing Israel–Palestine conflict, the preload of an app tied to such a company becomes even more contentious.
So yes, the presence of Israeli software is a problem in many countries, and may even be illegal.
The difficulty in comprehending an answer to this question is precisely why allowing ones military to perform such actions using covert means is so dangerous for a civilian population to support.
War is supposed to be fought in the open in order to protect the civilians.
I suppose when the distinction between soldier and civilian is not so easy to make, the profligate mindset which allows covert, indiscriminate mass murder at scale becomes a norm.
I'll tell you as soon as you tell me exactly why ZTE devices were banned in the United States. The thing about clandestine operations is that they aren't done in the open.
Edit: I know what they wrote
Nvidia for example tripples size of one of the offices now (out of seven i think) and builds new campus in different city
Best step up to your words and throw away your phone then.
All major tech companies and chip manufacturers have R&D and design centers in Israel.
Genuine question.
- Not use Intel processors, as many are developed in Haifa
- Not use a firewall. It was invented in the IDF.
- Not use Waze. It's Israeli.
- Not use thumb drives. Invented in Israel.
- Not eat cherry tomatoes. Israeli development.
The list goes on and on, but I must add - if you ever suffer a serious head or stomach injury, tell the medics to not use the Israeli bandage.
The First thing that popped into my head, was
- is this a problem because of bloatware in general? Or…
- because its Israeli bloatware?
If the latter, I would understand your discomfort because of past security intrusions by Israeli companies.
But not if it’s just „IsRa-HeLl bAd“
Source: me who uninstalled AppCloud via adb on a phone purchased from Best Buy.
Hopefully one day we not only have open software, open hardware but also reproducibly guaranteed secure systems. Now I don't have any idea how this could be verified (and no, Microsoft's "Trusted Computing" is not what I have in mind), but I hope we'll see to this eventually.
There will always be a move towards centralization when a project gains enough converts because the bulk of concerns are exactly the same but we don't have n+1 people willing to do the necessary legwork to secure.
As such, just like REST apis and their N+1 query problem, forcing everyone to have a security conscious posture is never going to happen.
You absolutely need centralized authorities; what the real argume is about is how that authority is selected, changed and intermediated. The same way we argue about how a stable RAFT algorithm operates.
Move on from this "decentralization is all we need" argument. It's failed and failing.
How did I know? My phone had random notifications promoting apps that I had never heard of, and I couldn't find a way to disable them. Eventually I found and removed it via adb.
These scumbags.
Apparently only for the at&t variant.
for t-mobile
Wild how every ecosystem has its own "preloaded surprise pack."
For context: https://www.eunews.it/en/2025/11/05/italian-journalist-fired...
for example, annapurna labs in haifa develops the technology behind AWS’s nitro cards, which run the hypervisor, block storage, and networking in every EC2 server.
So, its a little bit tone deaf to hear these complaints from Americans honestly.
We’re told that we’re uncompetitive (yet when rising startups happen they’re bought out before being too large)- we’re told that we shouldn’t run on anything except US SaaS and US cloud providers.
I’m not saying that you specifically make these arguments, but the zeitgeist on HN definitely centres on this notion.
So, please forgive me for not taking this as seriously as you’d like me to.
So you might go with ARM, RISC V, but still have to make use of an OS and programming stack with strong ties to US based companies, even if open source.
And that's the difference I think; US and Israel have high trust, they are aligned in ideals and strategy and the like.
I hate that I have to say this, but I'm a Jew and I'm not anti-Semitic in any way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_espionage_in_the_Unite...
Remind me again of all the help Israel has provided the USA/the West that they are considered such a great (the greatest, in fact) ally?
I think a lot of this might come down to carrier deals though.
Best bet I would imagine is to buy an Android device not through a carrier and make sure it has the necessary wireless modem bands
Just originally founded in Israel.
Almost like posting it has an alterior motive.
If not, this article and almost every comment on this submission is a colossal waste of time.
This is supposed to be a technical website full of inquisitive hackers, right? Then perhaps try to examine the facts instead of guessing and bullshitting.
I haven't spent any time investigating, because I believe that privacy is nonexistent, but my Samsung phones have always enabled by default, a backup of everything I have (including the removable uSD cards) to a server in South Korea.
Even when I've disabled this behavior, it seems to persist at some level.
I live in the US BTW.
duxup•2mo ago
What a horrible experience you get with some providers and phones.
It's to the point that I think there should be some sort of regulation that involves you getting a baseline experience on the OS rather than a bunch of malware out of the box.
atonse•2mo ago
It's the same with Smart TVs, they've gotten so cheap because of all the other slimy stuff the manufacturers do, like sell your watch data, or pre-install apps.
esafak•2mo ago
atonse•2mo ago
xethos•2mo ago
Many OEMs sell their flagship as a shiny glass slab with only BT or USB-C for audio, and ship 3.5mm jacks and other "antiquated niceties" like a uSD card reader, on their lower-end models.
It's difficult to square the circle of "I want these specific features, but on a phone that's not working against me (any more than modern phones already do)"
HeinzStuckeIt•2mo ago
Physical keyboards were nice back in an era when the web welcomed longform text, and I miss my Nokia N900. Nowadays, though, the web ecosystem that one typically uses from a phone is a cesspool, and for serious things I’ll just use my real computer.
ipaddr•2mo ago
blep-arsh•2mo ago
AshamedCaptain•2mo ago
I hate the 3.5'' jack myself (see below), but I can already tell you that mentioning some unscientific definition of "superior sound quality" that likely no one amongst us is humanly able to distinguish is not going to win any minds over. Proponents of 3.5'' like it because it is ridiculously simple to use, intuitive, cheap, doesn't have a lot of things that can go wrong (e.g. no batteries) and despite that is overall effective.
The reason I dislike 3.5'' is because the _socket_ part (i.e. the part on the expensive device) wears out very quickly, becoming fragile and generating distracting artifacts even with slight cable pulls/movements, as the springs in the connector start to fail. This annoys me to no end, much more than any issues with other interfaces.
HeinzStuckeIt•2mo ago
edgineer•2mo ago
You demand higher quality, yet don't care about the loud noise created with every small movement of your body? I have heard this dismissed before as "doesn't bother me" and it's hardly ever mentioned in discussions about good audio vs Bluetooth.
I'm bewildered why wireless audio isn't praised for completely eliminating this source of noise that plagues every wired headphone, earbud, and IEM.
pmontra•2mo ago
On the other hand a wired headphone always work, had maybe better quality and almost surely a better latency. I use one of them when doing calls from my laptop.
Plasmoid•2mo ago
mc32•2mo ago
sodality2•2mo ago
ploxiln•2mo ago
EDIT: also see the Xperia 10 VII for a phone that isn't 2 years old (I haven't been keeping up, I buy phones to use for 4+ years)
pmontra•2mo ago
pmontra•2mo ago
xethos•2mo ago
cultofmetatron•2mo ago
elsjaako•2mo ago
takipsizad•2mo ago
rubyn00bie•2mo ago
Every experience may not be as bad as the one the OP had, but it’s surely well within reality. Both carriers and handset manufacturers are glad to sell anything and everything about someone to make a quick buck. They’ve literally been doing it for 25+ years.
montjoy•2mo ago
Here’s a made up example, and it’s probably not even the best one. - Show Teckno-Detectives shows a “Cameo” of Grapple’s newest mixed-reality glasses. The data shows that 3.9 million additional people watched the episode. Investment firms who pay for the data notice and buy extra Grapple shares to cash in on the expected sales bump.
elsjaako•2mo ago
Let's say my phone gets $10 cheaper because of all this crap ware. If you have the aggregate of 1000 people that cost someone $10000. Is that really worth it? Is 100000 people worth $1000000? Is there some point at which the aggregate data becomes so valuable it overtakes the per-user cost?
That's what I mean - the marginal value of one person needs to be quite big for this whole thing to make sense.
kakacik•2mo ago
Economies of scale do bring costs of everything much further than stealing user's data can, but good luck explaining some long term vision to C-suites who only care about short term bonuses.
tyfon•2mo ago
But the premium devices (especially TVs) are starting to do this too now via software updates. I had to turn off a bunch of crap in the settings on my LG CX TVs some time ago. Now they are just off the internet and can only connect to my NAS.
ghurtado•2mo ago
Not really, they've gotten so cheap because the individual components they are made of have become much cheaper due to economies of scale.
The same thing happened with computer monitors, and those don't ship with the bloatware.
brookst•2mo ago
ozgrakkurt•2mo ago
ravenstine•2mo ago
jajuuka•2mo ago
jacquesm•2mo ago
The last time I saw an update that just fixed security bugs and improved performance was... never.
avn2109•2mo ago
BolexNOLA•2mo ago
cryzinger•2mo ago
SoftTalker•2mo ago
You can usually disable them, but they are still there.
cryzinger•2mo ago
summermusic•2mo ago
t0bia_s•2mo ago
summermusic•2mo ago
jeroenhd•2mo ago
Consumers often have a choice, at least between "filled to the brim with crap" and "a modicum of crap", by choosing between buying their phone from a store or from a carrier. Carriers have better deals but shovel their phones full of the worst apps you can imagine. Still, people will buy the crap-filled experience that makes you want to tear your hair out because they like the idea of scoring a better deal.
Nothing like unadulterated greed combined with short-sighed consumer behaviour at scale to drive a market segment into an awful race to the bottom.
oceansky•2mo ago
smileson2•2mo ago
robocat•2mo ago
What's a better word here? Adverts cost the consumer, however I'm sure the consumer doesn't get equal recompense. Theoretically a SmartTV with adverts costs less money ("subsidised" due to price competition), but is the consumer actually ($,time) better off?
The costs are invisible and the consumer cannot actually measure the costs (the vendors do measure profitability but this is not legible).
I reckon most people are terrible at judging the value of their own time (especially children and retirees).
jay_kyburz•2mo ago
I'm looking at HMD or Motorola.
kbelder•2mo ago
It pre-installs some games, but you can uninstall them. The only thing it forces on you is a weather app which you can deactivate but not uninstall.
rootusrootus•2mo ago
There were lots of downsides to that deal, of course, but I appreciate that it broke the carriers' exclusive control over mobile phones.
cyanydeez•2mo ago
linksnapzz•2mo ago
I remember the Verizon crapware phone experience well.
kotaKat•2mo ago
Forgeties79•2mo ago
cyanydeez•2mo ago
rootusrootus•2mo ago
yupyupyups•2mo ago
I don't like Apple either, they are DEFINITELY rent seeking and violating their users' privacy at the same time. There is no excuse for that. I think what the parent post was talking about is something historical. An iPhone at that time was a large step above a Nokia or a Sony Ericsson in terms of flexibility.
M95D•2mo ago
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone
consumer451•2mo ago
robgibbons•2mo ago
t0bia_s•2mo ago
jamesrr39•2mo ago
Fortunately Android is a pretty diverse range and Samsung is just one player. I had much more user-friendly experiences with Fairphone and Motorola.
Cthulhu_•2mo ago