frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Slint: Cross Platform UI Library

https://slint.dev/
1•Palmik•4m ago•0 comments

AI and Education: Generative AI and the Future of Critical Thinking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7PvscqGD24
1•nyc111•4m ago•0 comments

Maple Mono: Smooth your coding flow

https://font.subf.dev/en/
1•signa11•5m ago•0 comments

Moltbook isn't real but it can still hurt you

https://12gramsofcarbon.com/p/tech-things-moltbook-isnt-real-but
1•theahura•8m ago•0 comments

Take Back the Em Dash–and Your Voice

https://spin.atomicobject.com/take-back-em-dash/
1•ingve•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: 289x speedup over MLP using Spectral Graphs

https://zenodo.org/login/?next=%2Fme%2Fuploads%3Fq%3D%26f%3Dshared_with_me%25253Afalse%26l%3Dlist...
1•andrespi•10m ago•0 comments

Teaching Mathematics

https://www.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~spurny/doc/articles/arnold.htm
1•samuel246•12m ago•0 comments

3D Printed Microfluidic Multiplexing [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ2ZcOzLnGg
2•downboots•13m ago•0 comments

Abstractions Are in the Eye of the Beholder

https://software.rajivprab.com/2019/08/29/abstractions-are-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/
2•whack•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Routed Attention – 75-99% savings by routing between O(N) and O(N²)

https://zenodo.org/records/18518956
1•MikeBee•13m ago•0 comments

We didn't ask for this internet – Ezra Klein show [video]

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ve02F0gyfjY
1•softwaredoug•14m ago•0 comments

The Real AI Talent War Is for Plumbers and Electricians

https://www.wired.com/story/why-there-arent-enough-electricians-and-plumbers-to-build-ai-data-cen...
2•geox•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MimiClaw, OpenClaw(Clawdbot)on $5 Chips

https://github.com/memovai/mimiclaw
1•ssslvky1•17m ago•0 comments

I Maintain My Blog in the Age of Agents

https://www.jerpint.io/blog/2026-02-07-how-i-maintain-my-blog-in-the-age-of-agents/
3•jerpint•17m ago•0 comments

The Fall of the Nerds

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/the-fall-of-the-nerds
1•otoolep•19m ago•0 comments

I'm 15 and built a free tool for reading Greek/Latin texts. Would love feedback

https://the-lexicon-project.netlify.app/
2•breadwithjam•22m ago•1 comments

How close is AI to taking my job?

https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/how-close-is-ai-to-taking-my-job
1•cjbarber•22m ago•0 comments

You are the reason I am not reviewing this PR

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/479442
2•midzer•24m ago•1 comments

Show HN: FamilyMemories.video – Turn static old photos into 5s AI videos

https://familymemories.video
1•tareq_•25m ago•0 comments

How Meta Made Linux a Planet-Scale Load Balancer

https://softwarefrontier.substack.com/p/how-meta-turned-the-linux-kernel
1•CortexFlow•26m ago•0 comments

A Turing Test for AI Coding

https://t-cadet.github.io/programming-wisdom/#2026-02-06-a-turing-test-for-ai-coding
2•phi-system•26m ago•0 comments

How to Identify and Eliminate Unused AWS Resources

https://medium.com/@vkelk/how-to-identify-and-eliminate-unused-aws-resources-b0e2040b4de8
3•vkelk•27m ago•0 comments

A2CDVI – HDMI output from from the Apple IIc's digital video output connector

https://github.com/MrTechGadget/A2C_DVI_SMD
2•mmoogle•27m ago•0 comments

CLI for Common Playwright Actions

https://github.com/microsoft/playwright-cli
3•saikatsg•28m ago•0 comments

Would you use an e-commerce platform that shares transaction fees with users?

https://moondala.one/
1•HamoodBahzar•30m ago•1 comments

Show HN: SafeClaw – a way to manage multiple Claude Code instances in containers

https://github.com/ykdojo/safeclaw
3•ykdojo•33m ago•0 comments

The Future of the Global Open-Source AI Ecosystem: From DeepSeek to AI+

https://huggingface.co/blog/huggingface/one-year-since-the-deepseek-moment-blog-3
3•gmays•33m ago•0 comments

The Evolution of the Interface

https://www.asktog.com/columns/038MacUITrends.html
2•dhruv3006•35m ago•1 comments

Azure: Virtual network routing appliance overview

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/virtual-network-routing-appliance-overview
3•mariuz•35m ago•0 comments

Seedance2 – multi-shot AI video generation

https://www.genstory.app/story-template/seedance2-ai-story-generator
2•RyanMu•39m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Tesla Robotaxi had 3 more crashes, now 7 total

https://electrek.co/2025/11/17/tesla-robotaxi-had-3-more-crashes-now-7-total/
61•juujian•2mo ago

Comments

elsjaako•2mo ago
I had a discussion with a colleague today. He claimed Tesla had Full Self Driving, and had for years, and they were the first. That's the message some folks believe.

I look forward to telling him about this.

temperceve•2mo ago
I've never understood why some people insist that FSD means there can never ever be any crashes of any kind, otherwise it obiviously just doesn't work.
pu_pe•2mo ago
It needs human operators and still crashes 2x more than their competitor. And they have been calling it FSD for years now.
elsjaako•2mo ago
For me FSD means they are legally allowed to operate it on a public road with no supervising driver.

Obviously no crashes ever isn't expected. Even roller coasters have accidents sometimes.

Tesla will get there I'm sure. But I know at least two people that are in Musks influence sphere that believe it to already be the case.

temperceve•2mo ago
I use FSD 99% of the time now and it works 99% of the time I use it. When it doesn't work, it is always in an annoying, going-way-to-slow way. I've never experienced it crash into anything. I'm sure the experts here know better than me, I'm just a lowly customer, but from MY experience, it basically works all the time.
thatwasunusual•2mo ago
> humans generally have a crash, whether they are at fault or not, every 700,000 miles. Tesla has 7 in probably ~300,000 miles

This is the important part.

poszlem•2mo ago
Exactly. I can accept those cars not being perfect, but I can’t accept them performing worse than human drivers.
lnsru•2mo ago
But humans are operating under the conditions not feasible for those cars. There is winter start in Germany with rain turning to snow and blizzard with poor visibility plus ice on the road. Humans still drive, vision only system will fail in first minute.
poszlem•2mo ago
And that changes what I said in what way? If cars aren't as safe as people (including in those conditions), they shouldn't drive. But once they match us, waiting for them to be perfect is a waste of time.
lnsru•2mo ago
That means, that accidents of humans happen anytime and everywhere. While robotaxis cause accidents in less harsh conditions making statistics not really comparable. On the other hand statistics say that most accidents happen in summer: https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/overview/crashes-b... My bad.
JKCalhoun•2mo ago
I guess I can't accept them not being perfect. Lacking accountability, they have a much higher bar in my mind to replace human drivers.
hack_edu•2mo ago
Human drivers that are at fault face repercussions that affect the rest of their lives. Robot drivers that are at fault face repercussions of a minuscule fine and a "sorry... again" press release.
tialaramex•2mo ago
In practice drivers don't face repercussions proportional to the real impact because all of police, prosecutors and a potential jury see themselves in the driver as they too are likely drivers.

If you do something dumb and it kills another person, there's an excellent chance you get tried for manslaughter and a decent chance you go to jail. Unless it was in a car, then it's just a "car accident" and most likely you won't even be arrested because well, you were driving a car, sometimes killing people just happens right?

luke5441•2mo ago
And that is with professional safety drivers. Give humans a professional safety co-pilot and compare numbers with that...
tim333•2mo ago
The human number seems iffy. 700,000 miles is about what the typical driver does in a lifetime and they tend to have more than one crash. Maybe for professional drivers working? I've had several crashes and still usually qualify for the cheapest insurance group. Some of the minor ones aren't worth reporting - it's cheaper to just fix the car or ignore the dent.
ants_everywhere•2mo ago
It seems like they should add lidar or radar.

What is the argument for deliberately impoverishing the Tesla sensory input?

cj•2mo ago
There was a time when saying this on HN would have gotten you downvoted into oblivion. People felt extremely strongly that everything should be possible with cameras.

I wonder if that sentiment is changing.

ants_everywhere•2mo ago
Even if one believes everything should be possible with cameras, the goal posts are moving. Other automated vehicles use radar or lidar. Even if Tesla achieves fatality levels comparable with human drivers, other vehicles will outperform them. There's not going to be a great market for the most fatal automatic vehicle. It makes more sense to chase state of the art rather than the state of the median human.
steveBK123•2mo ago
And Tesla pumps don't even realize how poor the camera specs are on Tesla's for their "we don't need lidar/radar, all we need is vision" strategy.

Front camera is sub-4K, the rest of the cameras are 1440p.. all of which are processed at 24fps. We are talking 10 year old iPhone specs here.

Veserv•2mo ago
The cameras actually do not even meet minimum vision requirements required to hold a license in California and most other states.

Here is one of my posts with a detailed breakdown and analysis: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43605034

steveBK123•2mo ago
It's fascinating that FSD is driving real cars on public roads with FPS that most gamers would disdain. It's only a couple tons of moving metal, would could go wrong?
robotswantdata•2mo ago
How many crashes per human Uber mile?
atwrk•2mo ago
How many crashes per mile for Waymo etc. would be the more interesting metric - if the competition has better numbers there is no excuse for risking people's safety with inferior tech
bryanlarsen•2mo ago
Those numbers are readily available. https://waymo.com/safety/impact/

1 in 4 million, more than an order of magnitude better than Tesla.

input_sh•2mo ago
Last sentence in the article.
JKCalhoun•2mo ago
Why not compare the numbers to bus, train or other mass-transit fatalities?

I suppose because in the U.S. we are forever stuck in our car culture.

lnsru•2mo ago
I really don’t envy the supervisor’s job. Sitting there bored to death for weeks and waiting accident to happen. And when it happens you’re too bored and too tired to engage in timely manner.

On the other hand… the not paid version of cruise control continuously fails in my two years old model Y. Realistically looking it’s to early to fantasize about robitaxis when simple phantom braking problem is not solved yet.

steveBK123•2mo ago
Phantom braking has been a huge issue since at least 2017, constant whack a mole release to release, really nuked my confidence in the product over time.
neither_color•2mo ago
The unpaid version of cruise control/autopilot is actually a different software from the one that comes bundled with FSD. I actually think the semi-smart autopilot that comes bundled with FSD is better than FSD itself.

I tried to get into FSD but I felt that it made me an obnoxious driver. Chill is too slow and makes unnecessary lane changes. Hurry makes too many unnecessary lane changes while speeding beyond the flow of traffic. When you encounter a "mormon roadblock", e.g two cars going the speed limit on a two lane road, FSD goes into a loop changing lanes back and forth hoping for an overtake that never comes. If you're the type of driver who picks his exit lane early because you know they're prone to jamming and drivers blocking each other later, FSD will still try to get out of the merge lane to pass, ditto for busy intersection queues.

Removing the human driver makes one things SPECIFICALLY worse, and that is the ability to correct navigation errors and override sub-optimal routing. For example: there is one block on my commute where you can take either an uncontrolled left turn, or go up to a light. The difference is one block and the light is usually faster during rush hour because the uncontrolled turn takes forever to get a safe gap. Navigation always chooses the uncontrolled left to the point that you have to disengage. There's other quality of life issues too like wanting to approach your destination from the left or the right because you know the parking situation ahead of time. These can be communicated to a human driver. You can't explain that to Tesla FSD though. It's tapped into the car-machine-god hivemind and can't be bothered with instructions from mere mortals.

But I digress, I think the paid, semi-smart autopilot is their best product. I can set an objective speed limit. It stops at stop signs and red lights automatically. It stays in its lane until I tap the blinker so it changes lane. It can autopark. These things actually augment my driving and reduce cognitive strain while driving, while keeping me just alert enough. FSD is all or nothing while requiring full non-interactive attention like a sentinel.

xnx•2mo ago
> Realistically looking it’s to early to fantasize about robitaxis

...for Tesla. For Waymo they're already doing >250K rider-omly rides/week.

tim333•2mo ago
Also Baidu and WeRide. Baidu have 1000 taxis in Wuhan and say they are profitable on a per car basis.
Ferret7446•2mo ago
I don't know how much I trust any numbers coming out of China. You'd be hard pressed to find any number that is only cooked one time.
lnsru•2mo ago
As an hardware engineer I would trust the numbers. With radar, lidar and camera fusion more could be achieved. Or April tags on the main streets in the city. Ar magnetic markers in the streets.
tim333•2mo ago
The Baidu robotaxi seems pretty much a copy of the Waymo one. Interestingly both seem able to be remote controlled by a human at their office if they have problems so the autonomous driving may not be quite as good as made out.
tim333•2mo ago
yeah, dunno. My source was this https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/20/global-robotaxi-race-heats-u...

There's an ft article today saying "According to Goldman Sachs, China’s nascent robotaxi market is expected to rise from $54mn this year to $47bn by 2035." which would be a lot (https://archive.ph/U7R9a)

ants_everywhere•2mo ago
If Tesla's robotaxis develop a reputation for accidents, they'll create an unpredictable traffic bubble around them.

Some people will slow down to minimize the fatality of an impact and to increase reaction time (similar to people slowing down around a marked cop car). Others will speed up to ensure they don't get stuck behind or around one.

That happens with other unsafe vehicles (e.g. a truck that doesn't have its load well secured). But it makes me wonder what will happen if Tesla trains on the data of erratic driving created by its presence.

boudin•2mo ago
I'm doing this with Tesla's on the road already. When I see one i'm extra-cautious.

This company is so shaddy around all the driving assistance and FSD issues that i have 0 trust and will not until it is thoroughly investigated. They are quite behind other manufacturers on simple stuff like line assistance and automated breaking already, they are going out of their way to make every reported incident sounding that others are to blame, it just looks bad from end to end.

Rushing those robotaxis is just trying to hide the fact that they are quite behind the competition on all those fronts.

JKCalhoun•2mo ago
"Honey, don't spook 'em!" (A thought that went through my head when the wife and I were recently driving in the Bay Area surrounded by Teslas, ha ha.)
queenkjuul•2mo ago
On my last road trip i saw a Tesla go from 75 to 60 to 110 in the span of about 20 seconds then the driver pulled over and stopped and got out. No idea what the fuck happened there but I'm certainly giving them all a wide berth from now on. This was wide open road with almost no other other traffic in broad daylight.
lordnacho•2mo ago
> Unlike other companies reporting to NHTSA, Tesla abuses the right to redact data reported through the system. The automaker redacts the “narrative” for each reported crash, preventing the public from knowing how the crashes happened and who is responsible.

This part seems pretty bad

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF•2mo ago
> preventing the public from knowing

So just assume the information looks really bad for Tesla.

input_sh•2mo ago
They must've learned their lesson from Cruise, who got caught lying in these reports, lost its license to operate in California, stopped offering robotaxis nationwide, and GM divested from it.
steveBK123•2mo ago
Flagged in under 15 minutes, seems the fever has still not broken
mahkeiro•2mo ago
The flagging system on HN is really not efficient and often abused.
juancn•2mo ago
But how many miles driven? Severity? Is it worse or better than a human driver?

With just a total number it's hard to reason about what it means.

elsjaako•2mo ago
From the article:

>I expect a few because humans generally have a crash, whether they are at fault or not, every 700,000 miles. Tesla has 7 in probably ~300,000 miles, which should be worrying to anyone, whether the Robotaxis were responsible or not.

josefritzishere•2mo ago
Are we sure this is a taxi and not a Dalek?