a condensation cycle will occur, and drip percolate the soft tissue and adipocere into a slurry [coffin liquor] that will settle to the bottom of the sarcophagus.
I don't know the circumstances of this dig, but it may have been a rescue dig ahead of eg massive concrete foundations going in. In many countries this is what drives (and funds) fieldwork.
Until today. Open a grave one day and you are a grave robber. Open it on some other day and you are a scientist. I think the people who sealed the grave wouldn't see much of a difference.
Well the effort and care put into the grave made us - 2000 years later in cyberspace - in a sense remember the person. Who was this young woman? They even gave us hints/rewards. Made us curious.
So maybe they prepared her for an afterlife ... of continued memory and presence among the living, which they with their technological limitations succeeded in, we are talking about her, now.
Good post though.
Adblocking is the brush you need
IV century CE
If this is the case -- dont scientists have interest in analyzing the air contents inside this sealed box before it is fully opened -- maybe by inserting a narrow tube? Might that not teach us something that may help us preserve future archaeological finds better? Maybe we are irreversibly destroying some of the evidence inside it by casually opening them? (I am sure they are not intentionally careless or destroying it -- but just wondering if future scince might make the current scientific process look clunky and ill-advised)
(And they may have done so before opening. It probably wouldn't be mentioned in an article like this.)
[1] https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/08/12/beach-bar-sarc...
rolph•2mo ago
i strongly suspect this is not "mud" but the dried precipitate of liquified soft tissue, [coffin liquor] and condensation.
mptest•2mo ago
anonzzzies•2mo ago
Towaway69•2mo ago
ronjakoi•2mo ago
anonzzzies•2mo ago
Semaphor•2mo ago
https://napalmted.bandcamp.com/album/coffin-liquor
speed_spread•2mo ago
herodoturtle•2mo ago
Coffin Liquor. It's to die for.
masfuerte•2mo ago
xtiansimon•2mo ago
IAmBroom•2mo ago
dv_dt•2mo ago
sippeangelo•2mo ago
wunderlust•2mo ago
potato3732842•2mo ago
Mistletoe•2mo ago
https://historyinstone.blogspot.com/2019/07/above-ground-bur...
nixass•2mo ago
TIL
lostlogin•2mo ago
rolph•2mo ago
is 1.75 cubic feet of solid material reasonable?
the image displays distinct relief cracks of a drying wet slurry, the dark staining inside the coffin suggests high fluid mark was maybe 4inches, it may have knocked an urn over, before recedeing, and evaporating.
while not up on the finer points of such burial practice, it doesnt seem unreasonable that a consideral amount of flowers and other plant materials may be involved, there should be considerable pollen present, potassium and sodium salts of the decedent, adipocere, and perhaps diatoms dependent on the nature of the soil, and source of water percolating into the sarcophagus.
i believe considering it to be just mud, would be to overlook, a volume of pertinant discovery.
nkrisc•2mo ago
odyssey7•2mo ago
IAmBroom•2mo ago
Step 2: Archive it. (Dig and catalogue)
Step 3: Analyze it.
We often learn new things from fossils that have been shelved for decades, but not yet researched, so I assume analysis is still in the pipeline.