frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/07/boomers_vs_zoomers_workplace/
1•Willingham•5m ago•0 comments

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

https://lauriepenny.substack.com/p/the-big-hunger
1•shervinafshar•6m ago•0 comments

The Genus Amanita

https://www.mushroomexpert.com/amanita.html
1•rolph•11m ago•0 comments

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

https://shattered.io/
1•mooreds•12m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

1•Buttons840•13m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

1•pinkmuffinere•14m ago•0 comments

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01815
1•walterbell•19m ago•0 comments

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67747-9
1•PaulHoule•21m ago•0 comments

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

https://www.wsj.com/world/india/why-big-tech-is-throwing-cash-into-india-in-quest-for-ai-supremac...
1•saikatsg•21m ago•0 comments

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

https://github.com/aweussom/HowToShootYourselfInTheFoot
1•aweussom•21m ago•0 comments

Eight More Months of Agents

https://crawshaw.io/blog/eight-more-months-of-agents
3•archb•23m ago•0 comments

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-digital-self/202602/from-human-thought-to-machine-coo...
1•walterbell•23m ago•0 comments

The new X API pricing must be a joke

https://developer.x.com/
1•danver0•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

https://rma-dashboard.bukhari-kibuka7.workers.dev/
1•bumahkib7•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

https://github.com/2015xli/jqassistant-graph-rag
1•artigent•30m ago•0 comments

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

https://mccue.dev/pages/2-6-26-python-competitor
3•dragandj•31m ago•0 comments

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

https://www.mauriciopoppe.com/notes/tmux-to-zellij/
1•maurizzzio•32m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

1•otterley•33m ago•0 comments

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

https://signoz.io/blog/otel-baggage/
1•pranay01•34m ago•0 comments

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

https://davmail.sourceforge.net/
1•todsacerdoti•35m ago•0 comments

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

https://github.com/sqlmodel/sqlmodel
1•Sean766•37m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

https://github.com/chinonsochikelue/tharos
1•fluantix•37m ago•0 comments

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

https://simonsafar.com/2024/win32_lights/
1•MaximilianEmel•37m ago•0 comments

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

https://www.ibli.com/IBLI%20OnePagers%20The%20Plays%20Summarized.pdf
1•mooreds•38m ago•1 comments

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

https://donuts20.vercel.app
1•sngahane•39m ago•0 comments

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/06/onecourt-tactile-device-super-bowl-blind-low-vision-fans/
1•gaws•41m ago•0 comments

Rudolf Vrba

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vrba
1•mooreds•41m ago•0 comments

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/119747
1•paulpauper•42m ago•0 comments

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

https://aurio.place/
1•cherrylinedev•43m ago•1 comments

NASA delays moon rocket launch by a month after fuel leaks during test

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/feb/03/nasa-delays-moon-rocket-launch-month-fuel-leaks-a...
2•mooreds•44m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Cryptology firm cancels elections after losing encryption key

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62vl05rz0ko
18•tagawa•2mo ago

Comments

belter•2mo ago
https://www.iacr.org/news/item/27138
potato3732842•2mo ago
Better than losing the key and finding a "workaround" I guess.
sschueller•2mo ago
Some things just work, like paper ballots. No reason to re-invent the wheel or to "verschlimmbessern" what works.

We vote a lot in Switzerland on a lot of issues but we do so on paper ballots which we can either drop directly in the box or send in the post. When there is a close vote the maximum wait for a result is usually around 4-5 hours so that isn't really an issue either. Counting is a highly distributed effort and IMO that also reduces the risk for large scale fraud.

scotty79•2mo ago
It absolutely doesn't work. All paper elections have some (acceptable and accepted) level of fraud. We should move to mathematical system, that still uses paper but let's the voter confirm that thier vote was properly counted. There was a TED presentation about this many years ago.
soco•2mo ago
Evidence says it works. And evidence beats ted talks any second, to the constant surprise of the tech (or influencer) community.
scotty79•2mo ago
Ok. If "works" means, "is good eonugh to be used for the purpose", I guess it works. But shamanistic medicine wokrs by the same measure so it's really not a high bar to clear.
Gud•2mo ago
Not really? Shamanistic medicine doesn't work.

Switzerland has the highest functioning democracy on the planet.

soco•2mo ago
I guess, but I only guess, that if it's not happening in the States it means it's impossible and shamanistic. Kind of like universal healthcare, you know.
scotty79•2mo ago
> Shamanistic medicine doesn't work.

It worked enough for people to be using it.

> Switzerland has the highest functioning democracy on the planet.

Somehow I think being completely secure in last two world wars contributes to the success of their high functioning democracy. Also, I thought we were talking about elections not democracy.

Democracy can work perfectly well even if the elections select completely random party to rule if all parties are good enough.

MattPalmer1086•2mo ago
All these clever voting systems suffer from the problem that most people just don't understand it well enough to trust it.

Paper elections are simple and everyone understands them. The controls are largely that there are a lot of observers.

Trust is vital in elections.

compsciphd•2mo ago
I agree with you. the counter that some people make (that I personally disagree with as being a reason to not do it) is that anything that lets voters confirm that their vote was properly counted also enables 3rd parties to influence said voters (i.e. buying a vote is more valuable if one can validate that bought vote was actually delivered).

Personally I find other mechanism to heavily criminalize vote buying as being effective to discouraging that behavior and providing a slip of paper to the voter that enables them to post factor validate that their vote was counted as they believe it should have been to be much more valuable.

but its important to address the issue that some people have.

scotty79•2mo ago
Given that votes are already bought for money (through political marketing) maybe it's not a strong problem to use technology that enables more direct and honest vote buying.

Who knows, maybe that's a road to equivalent of universal income. Being paid for your vote for one party or another.

This system was described in Spanish Beggars by Nancy Kress

pxeger1•2mo ago
Why does the IACR use the term "cryptology" rather than "cryptography"?
tptacek•2mo ago
Cryptology is the science, cryptography the practice.
jtokoph•2mo ago
Previously: A cryptography research body held an election and they can't decrypt the results https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46020596
tagawa•2mo ago
Ah, sorry. I'd only searched for cryptology and should've been more thorough.
glitchc•2mo ago
It's the same story.
glitchc•2mo ago
This headline is incorrect, elections were rescheduled, not canceled.
stavros•2mo ago
It sounds like "3 out of 3" is too risky, as you're basically tripling the risk of losing a key (but you're reducing the risk of compromise). Something like "3 out of 4" would have been a better balance, in my opinion, but I think there were technical issues in requiring such a quorum (I think I read that the encryption scheme didn't support it, but don't quote me).
anonymars•2mo ago
I guess it's my turn to post it -- https://m.xkcd.com/2030/

Like fine wine

tomhow•2mo ago
Previously:

A cryptography research body held an election and they can't decrypt the results - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46020596 - Nov 2025 (38 comments)