I tried to watch the YouTube video but the UX popped in and caused me to click on some other random link.
The "new and improved" cloud portal for doing Navy performance evaluations turned into such an unadulterated shitshow that everyone went back to the old system. A Visual Basic application bolted on top of an MS Access database . . . that originally was someone's side project in 1998.
..and then used Excel formulas of all things as the basis for its scripting language.
It's as if they wanted these things to be as clunky and spaghettified as possible.
We're obviously reading a developer centric forum where people seem to have a hard time seeing things from anything other than a developer's point of view. Have hammer, everything is a nail situation. People just not wanting to become a coder isn't because they are scared of it. They just don't want to do it. I don't want to be a florist. I don't go bitching to florists that there's not an easy way to make floral arrangements without learning basics nor does it make me scared of it. Whatever "fear" you want to imply really makes you sound out of touch with non-developers.
Also in the spirit of bad UX, clicking the winning link (Dalia) just reloads the current page, lol.
This testimonial killed me because it's something ChatGPT will totally actually say
I had to do it several times again to confirm this was just absolutely absurd luck.
But it shows a bigger problem: the generation of designers grew up on abhorrent design that Figma normalised. They don’t know what bad is, they won’t recognise bad. Only outrageous made-up UX “pranks” are bad to them. How about showing an actual bad UX of Figma on their podcast?
Lowering the plank towards a fantasy bad UX makes any UX above it good.
shellwizard•2mo ago
monooso•2mo ago
From the website:
> Build a date picker with bad UX (the worse, the better)
bunher•2mo ago
Y-bar•2mo ago
http://hallofshame.gp.co.at/
andrepd•2mo ago
What does it mean if many of these entries are above-average in today's UI landscape? x)