I demand my trial by jury.
Juries are a great safety measure for bad law. This is why they have been vital for the last 600 or so years.
So we still have the ability to make our views known. Write to MPs in the first instance. Basically, they need to be informed that this is a bright red line.
However, I suspect it'll take a mass demo in London to really drive the point home.
Only 110k at the UTK rally? I'd hope a demo in opposition to this proposal would completely choke up London.
jjgreen•2mo ago
EtienneDeLyon•2mo ago
Today I learn a new word!
ImJamal•2mo ago
I assume you are referring to clause 39, but it says "or" indicating a jury trial is not necessary?
> No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
392•2mo ago
Podrod•2mo ago
DrPimienta•2mo ago
tomatocracy•2mo ago
As to why that is - the explanations I've seen generally feature incompetence amongst various parts of the system and a degree of underfunding (or perhaps poorly managed funding) - including the fact that there is a shortage of criminal barristers due to poor pay. Juries themselves don't seem to be cited as a huge problem.
0. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/criminal-court-sta...
ronsor•2mo ago