Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg - 883 comments
This one is almost a one-line change (technically they need an extra flag in the YAML but that's hardly difficult): https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/12882#discussi...
That said, I still think Github is fine, and you can't argue with free CI - especially on Windows/Mac. If they ever stop that I'll definitely consider Codeberg. Or if Codeberg gets support for stacked PRs (i.e. dependencies between PRs), then I'm there! So frustrating that Github doesn't support such an obvious workflow.
Not spending on maintenance and spending gobs on something many people don’t want is far worse. It says we have the money, we just don’t give a fuck.
mechazawa•25m ago
Zardoz84•16m ago
pan69•15m ago
This sounds a bit like an oxymoron. More diversity will only help the ecosystem IMHO.
xeonmc•15m ago
IshKebab•14m ago
phoronixrly•10m ago
I see this as a total win.
P.S. Please stop trying to make tangled happen, it's not going to happen. Open-source projects are running away from corporate git forges. Why would they choose a VC-controlled one built on top of a VC-controlled protocol with known deficiencies.
hinkley•6m ago
sdqali•9m ago
hinkley•7m ago
Seriously though the big problem to solve will be squatters, when there are three logical places for a module to be hosted. That could create issues if you want to migrate.
I would rather have this happening after a contender to git has surfaced. Something for instance with more project tracking built in so migration were simpler.