2 days ago, 17 points, 23 comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46195226

"A pure blank-slatist would put it at 0%. A pure hereditarian would put it at 100%. Any reasonable person would put it somewhere in the middle, leaving two questions unresolved: where exactly?, and, what does the figure even mean?"

This article is a straw man. You won't find any 'pure hereditarian' who claims IQ is 100% determined by genetic inheritance. Most think it's around 50%. Even Cremieux who is mentioned in this article doesn't claim 100%.