If it's a stable 24x7 load it would be ideal for nuclear energy, low carbon, but slow to adapt to changes in demand.
It’s not like when you ask GPT a question, the energy grid takes a dip. No, data centers have massive power draw. They also have battery backup systems that are the primary drivers of stable power along with power inverters and all sorts of power equipment on site. The fact that we are building out more data centers means we need more power. The energy marketplace has only so much extra capacity (various forms) before it too is depleted. So, you bring on more power plants, more reactors, more solar farms, moar powah!
No, what is sad is that we have the ability to turn every roof, every window, every side wall into a power source and yet we choose not to.
(I wrote a demand response energy grid “manipulation” platform)
Staying that as a genuine question since I'm not sure how the math works out at that scale, you have to weigh that against hardware depreciation of course.
Solving fusion could usher in the golden age that atomic power failed to produce
danmaz74•46m ago
rmoriz•41m ago
sigwinch•26m ago
kouiskas•26m ago
solarengineer•10m ago
Filligree•7m ago
Radiation from nuclear waste is constrained to steel casks in cooling ponds, and the waste can be reprocessed for use in breeder reactors instead of letting it sit.
cr125rider•7m ago
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/27/ai-gives-coal-plant...