I’m working on eze, an AI‑powered co‑pilot that turns a raw startup idea into a visual, time‑bound execution roadmap.
It’s not live yet; I’m building it in parallel and wanted to test the waters before going too deep.
Shipping a product has become dramatically easier. With modern AI and “vibe‑coding” tools, a solo dev can stand something up in a weekend.
What hasn’t changed is the "execution planning":
Figuring out what to do, in what order, and why still means endless blog posts, podcasts, videos, and conflicting advice.
Most guidance assumes experience, capital, or a team that many first‑time/solo founders don’t have.
The result is messy Notion pages, random diagrams, and a constant feeling of “I’m probably missing something important.”
That gap—between being able to build and knowing how to execute—is what eze is trying to address.
The vision for eze:
- You describe your idea in a chat: problem, target user, B2B/B2C, SaaS/dev‑tool/etc.
- You add context: Where you are now (student, full‑time job, already building, solo vs team).
- Resources (time per week, money, people).
- Target launch horizon (1/3/6 months, etc.).
- Stages like validation, MVP, GTM, launch, post‑launch, scaling.
- Milestones with dependencies and brief descriptions.
- Each milestone is editable, trackable, and can have notes/due dates.
- You’d get this as an interactive diagram (boxes and arrows), not just a wall of text.
The longer‑term idea is for the AI to increasingly learn from real founder journeys and well‑known startup frameworks, so the recommendations are practical rather than generic checklists.
Right now, this is under active development. I have early prototypes of:
- Chat → structured roadmap representation
- Diagram‑style UI concepts
- Basic milestone/status model
I’d love your honest take on any of these:
- Is this actually useful, or just a shiny toy?
- What would it need to do for you to trust it enough to plan a real project?
- What’s obviously missing, naïve, or over‑complicated?
- Should I narrow it to a specific niche (e.g., dev‑tools/SaaS only) or scrap the idea altogether?
join waitlist here - https://eze.lovable.app/
Otherwise, any blunt feedback in the comments is extremely welcome. I’d rather course‑correct (or kill it) early than build something that only looks good in demos.
fieldops•1mo ago
foolmarshal•1mo ago
1. why waitlist - to gauge the audience and demand of the solution which the product is addressing and to check how many people resonate with the problem statement and is it even worth the build a solution around it.
2. impulse & instagram ad - i do not visualize eze as a "1 time utility app" or "i saw it on IG, lets try it out once" kinda app. i visualize eze as an integral part of startup building suite which founders can use to streamline ambiguous next steps in startup building journey and keep track of tasks at each milestone.
3. Monetization - subscription based model. different tiers with different offerings based on use-case and how much of "ambiguity and disorganized learnings" you're willing to offload to eze.