k_proton = 63.496 k_electron = 74.339
mass_ratio = 2^(k_electron - k_proton) = 2^10.843 = 1836.1526734400 experimental = 1836.1526734400 error = 2.6 × 10⁻¹³ % That's it. No fitting. No parameters. The ratio of any two particle masses is just 2^Δk. The framework (I call it LFM) is built on 4 axioms and 1 scaling law:
P_k = P₀ × 4^(-k) L_k = L_p × 2^k Anchored at k=66 (nuclear scale)
Everything derives from this. Mass hierarchies, the 200× pressure differential in hadrons, material properties. I built a materials simulator using these principles: https://github.com/KeithLuton/LFM-Resonant-materials-lab The Python proof is 10 lines. Run it yourself. I'm an independent researcher (read: broke, facing foreclosure). But the math is the math. Either I'm wrong and someone can show me where, or this is real. Curious what HN thinks.
DoctorOetker•1mo ago
the mass ratio immediately reappears when substituting the reduced compton wavelength definitions.
With unnecessary base 2 logarithms and powers of 2 to undo it...
You just ended up with a tautology m_p / m_e = m_p / m_e