frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Poddley.com – Follow people, not podcasts

https://poddley.com/guests/ana-kasparian/episodes
1•onesandofgrain•2m ago•0 comments

Layoffs Surge 118% in January – The Highest Since 2009

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/05/layoff-and-hiring-announcements-hit-their-worst-january-levels-si...
2•karakoram•2m ago•0 comments

Papyrus 114: Homer's Iliad

https://p114.homemade.systems/
1•mwenge•2m ago•1 comments

DicePit – Real-time multiplayer Knucklebones in the browser

https://dicepit.pages.dev/
1•r1z4•2m ago•1 comments

Turn-Based Structural Triggers: Prompt-Free Backdoors in Multi-Turn LLMs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14340
2•PaulHoule•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI Agent Tool That Keeps You in the Loop

https://github.com/dshearer/misatay
2•dshearer•5m ago•0 comments

Why Every R Package Wrapping External Tools Needs a Sitrep() Function

https://drmowinckels.io/blog/2026/sitrep-functions/
1•todsacerdoti•6m ago•0 comments

Achieving Ultra-Fast AI Chat Widgets

https://www.cjroth.com/blog/2026-02-06-chat-widgets
1•thoughtfulchris•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Runtime Fence – Kill switch for AI agents

https://github.com/RunTimeAdmin/ai-agent-killswitch
1•ccie14019•10m ago•1 comments

Researchers surprised by the brain benefits of cannabis usage in adults over 40

https://nypost.com/2026/02/07/health/cannabis-may-benefit-aging-brains-study-finds/
1•SirLJ•12m ago•0 comments

Peter Thiel warns the Antichrist, apocalypse linked to the 'end of modernity'

https://fortune.com/2026/02/04/peter-thiel-antichrist-greta-thunberg-end-of-modernity-billionaires/
1•randycupertino•13m ago•2 comments

USS Preble Used Helios Laser to Zap Four Drones in Expanding Testing

https://www.twz.com/sea/uss-preble-used-helios-laser-to-zap-four-drones-in-expanding-testing
2•breve•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Animated beach scene, made with CSS

https://ahmed-machine.github.io/beach-scene/
1•ahmedoo•19m ago•0 comments

An update on unredacting select Epstein files – DBC12.pdf liberated

https://neosmart.net/blog/efta00400459-has-been-cracked-dbc12-pdf-liberated/
2•ks2048•19m ago•0 comments

Was going to share my work

1•hiddenarchitect•22m ago•0 comments

Pitchfork: A devilishly good process manager for developers

https://pitchfork.jdx.dev/
1•ahamez•22m ago•0 comments

You Are Here

https://brooker.co.za/blog/2026/02/07/you-are-here.html
3•mltvc•26m ago•1 comments

Why social apps need to become proactive, not reactive

https://www.heyflare.app/blog/from-reactive-to-proactive-how-ai-agents-will-reshape-social-apps
1•JoanMDuarte•27m ago•1 comments

How patient are AI scrapers, anyway? – Random Thoughts

https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/07/how-patient-are-ai-scrapers-anyway/
1•samtrack2019•28m ago•0 comments

Vouch: A contributor trust management system

https://github.com/mitchellh/vouch
2•SchwKatze•28m ago•0 comments

I built a terminal monitoring app and custom firmware for a clock with Claude

https://duggan.ie/posts/i-built-a-terminal-monitoring-app-and-custom-firmware-for-a-desktop-clock...
1•duggan•29m ago•0 comments

Tiny C Compiler

https://bellard.org/tcc/
2•guerrilla•30m ago•0 comments

Y Combinator Founder Organizes 'March for Billionaires'

https://mlq.ai/news/ai-startup-founder-organizes-march-for-billionaires-protest-against-californi...
2•hidden80•31m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Need feedback on the idea I'm working on

1•Yogender78•31m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Addresses Security Risks

https://thebiggish.com/news/openclaw-s-security-flaws-expose-enterprise-risk-22-of-deployments-un...
2•vedantnair•31m ago•0 comments

Apple finalizes Gemini / Siri deal

https://www.engadget.com/ai/apple-reportedly-plans-to-reveal-its-gemini-powered-siri-in-february-...
1•vedantnair•32m ago•0 comments

Italy Railways Sabotaged

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czr4rx04xjpo
12•vedantnair•32m ago•2 comments

Emacs-tramp-RPC: high-performance TRAMP back end using MsgPack-RPC

https://github.com/ArthurHeymans/emacs-tramp-rpc
1•fanf2•34m ago•0 comments

Nintendo Wii Themed Portfolio

https://akiraux.vercel.app/
2•s4074433•38m ago•2 comments

"There must be something like the opposite of suicide "

https://post.substack.com/p/there-must-be-something-like-the
1•rbanffy•40m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: TimeProofs – Prove when data existed without uploading it

3•timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN,

I built TimeProofs, an open, privacy-first protocol to prove when a piece of data existed — without uploading the content.

You generate a hash locally, get a signed timestamp, and store a portable .tproof.json file. Verification can be done later, online or offline.

No blockchain. No accounts. No tracking. Just cryptographic proof.

This is v0.2 (stateless, bundle-based). Looking for feedback from devs and infra folks.

Docs: https://timeproofs.io Protocol: https://timeproofs.io/proofspec.html

Comments

timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN — I’m the creator.

TimeProofs is a small protocol to prove that some data existed at a given time, without uploading the data itself.

You hash locally, get a signed timestamp, and store a portable proof file (.tproof.json). Verification can be done later, even offline.

No blockchain, no accounts, no tracking.

Happy to answer questions or hear criticism.

marifjeren•1mo ago
That's cool. What's an example of when this would be useful?
timeproofs•1mo ago
For example: you generate a file (code, dataset, document, AI output) and later need to prove it already existed at a certain time. TimeProofs lets you create a small proof file you can keep. Anyone can later verify the timestamp without seeing the original content.
marifjeren•1mo ago
To me that's "what it does" whereas I'm wondering when it would be useful.

In other words, I can't think of a use case in industry or academia or daily life or whatever, where someone needs to prove that a file existed at a specific time

timeproofs•1mo ago
Fair question. It’s useful when you need to prove priority or existence without revealing the content. Examples: – You wrote something (code, research, idea) and want proof it existed before publication or disclosure. – You generated AI output and want to prove it wasn’t altered later. – You exchanged a document (contract draft, design, dataset) and want a neutral timestamp without involving a third party or storing the data. – You want evidence before a dispute, not after one starts. It’s not for everyday files — it’s for moments where “this existed at this time” might later matter. This keeps it grounded, avoids hype, and sounds like a real human explaining a niche tool.
sxzygz•1mo ago
Doesn’t your service have to exist to verify a proof?
timeproofs•1mo ago
You can reply concisely and technically. Suggested answer: No. Verification does not depend on the TimeProofs service being online. A TimeProofs proof is a self-contained, cryptographically signed file. Anyone can verify it offline or with independent tooling by: recomputing the hash, checking the signature, validating the timestamp against the public specification. The service is only required at issuance time to sign the proof. Verification is intentionally decoupled to avoid vendor lock-in and single points of failure. If TimeProofs disappeared tomorrow, all existing proofs would remain verifiable.
tromp•1mo ago
It seems you avoided answering the most crucial question:

What prevents an issuer from generating a proof that something existed arbitrarily far in the past?

Opentimestamps achieves that by Proof of Work. Do you require trusting the issuers instead?

timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN,

I’m the creator of TimeProofs, an open, stateless proof-of-existence protocol and API.

The problem it tries to solve is simple: How can you prove that a digital event or file existed at a given time, without uploading or exposing the data?

TimeProofs works by: - hashing data locally - issuing a signed timestamp - producing a portable proof file (.tproof.json) - allowing independent verification later (online or offline)

Key constraints: - no data storage - no metadata collection - no blockchain - no identity or compliance claims

It’s designed as a neutral infrastructure layer, similar in spirit to DNS or TLS, but for timestamped evidence.

One challenge we’re facing is discoverability: search engines often confuse “TimeProofs” with existing timestamping vendors or proprietary services, despite very different goals and architecture.

I’m posting here mainly to get technical feedback: - Is the problem clearly stated? - Is the scope too narrow or too broad? - Does the stateless + bundle approach make sense?

Website: https://timeproofs.io Spec: https://timeproofs.io/proofspec.html

Honest feedback welcome.