frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

1•pinkmuffinere•32s ago•0 comments

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01815
1•walterbell•5m ago•0 comments

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67747-9
1•PaulHoule•7m ago•0 comments

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

https://www.wsj.com/world/india/why-big-tech-is-throwing-cash-into-india-in-quest-for-ai-supremac...
1•saikatsg•7m ago•0 comments

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

https://github.com/aweussom/HowToShootYourselfInTheFoot
1•aweussom•7m ago•0 comments

Eight More Months of Agents

https://crawshaw.io/blog/eight-more-months-of-agents
3•archb•9m ago•0 comments

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-digital-self/202602/from-human-thought-to-machine-coo...
1•walterbell•9m ago•0 comments

The new X API pricing must be a joke

https://developer.x.com/
1•danver0•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

https://rma-dashboard.bukhari-kibuka7.workers.dev/
1•bumahkib7•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

https://github.com/2015xli/jqassistant-graph-rag
1•artigent•16m ago•0 comments

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

https://mccue.dev/pages/2-6-26-python-competitor
3•dragandj•17m ago•0 comments

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

https://www.mauriciopoppe.com/notes/tmux-to-zellij/
1•maurizzzio•18m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

1•otterley•19m ago•0 comments

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

https://signoz.io/blog/otel-baggage/
1•pranay01•20m ago•0 comments

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

https://davmail.sourceforge.net/
1•todsacerdoti•21m ago•0 comments

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

https://github.com/sqlmodel/sqlmodel
1•Sean766•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

https://github.com/chinonsochikelue/tharos
1•fluantix•23m ago•0 comments

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

https://simonsafar.com/2024/win32_lights/
1•MaximilianEmel•23m ago•0 comments

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

https://www.ibli.com/IBLI%20OnePagers%20The%20Plays%20Summarized.pdf
1•mooreds•24m ago•1 comments

Interactive Unboxing of J Dilla's Donuts

https://donuts20.vercel.app
1•sngahane•25m ago•0 comments

OneCourt helps blind and low-vision fans to track Super Bowl live

https://www.dezeen.com/2026/02/06/onecourt-tactile-device-super-bowl-blind-low-vision-fans/
1•gaws•27m ago•0 comments

Rudolf Vrba

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Vrba
1•mooreds•27m ago•0 comments

Autism Incidence in Girls and Boys May Be Nearly Equal, Study Suggests

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/119747
1•paulpauper•28m ago•0 comments

Wellness Hotels Discovery Application

https://aurio.place/
1•cherrylinedev•29m ago•1 comments

NASA delays moon rocket launch by a month after fuel leaks during test

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/feb/03/nasa-delays-moon-rocket-launch-month-fuel-leaks-a...
1•mooreds•30m ago•0 comments

Sebastian Galiani on the Marginal Revolution

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/02/sebastian-galiani-on-the-marginal-revol...
2•paulpauper•33m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Are we at the point where software can improve itself?

1•ManuelKiessling•33m ago•2 comments

Binance Gives Trump Family's Crypto Firm a Leg Up

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/business/binance-trump-crypto.html
1•paulpauper•33m ago•1 comments

Reverse engineering Chinese 'shit-program' for absolute glory: R/ClaudeCode

https://old.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1qy5l0n/reverse_engineering_chinese_shitprogram_for/
1•edward•33m ago•0 comments

Indian Culture

https://indianculture.gov.in/
1•saikatsg•36m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: TimeProofs – Prove when data existed without uploading it

3•timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN,

I built TimeProofs, an open, privacy-first protocol to prove when a piece of data existed — without uploading the content.

You generate a hash locally, get a signed timestamp, and store a portable .tproof.json file. Verification can be done later, online or offline.

No blockchain. No accounts. No tracking. Just cryptographic proof.

This is v0.2 (stateless, bundle-based). Looking for feedback from devs and infra folks.

Docs: https://timeproofs.io Protocol: https://timeproofs.io/proofspec.html

Comments

timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN — I’m the creator.

TimeProofs is a small protocol to prove that some data existed at a given time, without uploading the data itself.

You hash locally, get a signed timestamp, and store a portable proof file (.tproof.json). Verification can be done later, even offline.

No blockchain, no accounts, no tracking.

Happy to answer questions or hear criticism.

marifjeren•1mo ago
That's cool. What's an example of when this would be useful?
timeproofs•1mo ago
For example: you generate a file (code, dataset, document, AI output) and later need to prove it already existed at a certain time. TimeProofs lets you create a small proof file you can keep. Anyone can later verify the timestamp without seeing the original content.
marifjeren•1mo ago
To me that's "what it does" whereas I'm wondering when it would be useful.

In other words, I can't think of a use case in industry or academia or daily life or whatever, where someone needs to prove that a file existed at a specific time

timeproofs•1mo ago
Fair question. It’s useful when you need to prove priority or existence without revealing the content. Examples: – You wrote something (code, research, idea) and want proof it existed before publication or disclosure. – You generated AI output and want to prove it wasn’t altered later. – You exchanged a document (contract draft, design, dataset) and want a neutral timestamp without involving a third party or storing the data. – You want evidence before a dispute, not after one starts. It’s not for everyday files — it’s for moments where “this existed at this time” might later matter. This keeps it grounded, avoids hype, and sounds like a real human explaining a niche tool.
sxzygz•1mo ago
Doesn’t your service have to exist to verify a proof?
timeproofs•1mo ago
You can reply concisely and technically. Suggested answer: No. Verification does not depend on the TimeProofs service being online. A TimeProofs proof is a self-contained, cryptographically signed file. Anyone can verify it offline or with independent tooling by: recomputing the hash, checking the signature, validating the timestamp against the public specification. The service is only required at issuance time to sign the proof. Verification is intentionally decoupled to avoid vendor lock-in and single points of failure. If TimeProofs disappeared tomorrow, all existing proofs would remain verifiable.
tromp•1mo ago
It seems you avoided answering the most crucial question:

What prevents an issuer from generating a proof that something existed arbitrarily far in the past?

Opentimestamps achieves that by Proof of Work. Do you require trusting the issuers instead?

timeproofs•1mo ago
Hi HN,

I’m the creator of TimeProofs, an open, stateless proof-of-existence protocol and API.

The problem it tries to solve is simple: How can you prove that a digital event or file existed at a given time, without uploading or exposing the data?

TimeProofs works by: - hashing data locally - issuing a signed timestamp - producing a portable proof file (.tproof.json) - allowing independent verification later (online or offline)

Key constraints: - no data storage - no metadata collection - no blockchain - no identity or compliance claims

It’s designed as a neutral infrastructure layer, similar in spirit to DNS or TLS, but for timestamped evidence.

One challenge we’re facing is discoverability: search engines often confuse “TimeProofs” with existing timestamping vendors or proprietary services, despite very different goals and architecture.

I’m posting here mainly to get technical feedback: - Is the problem clearly stated? - Is the scope too narrow or too broad? - Does the stateless + bundle approach make sense?

Website: https://timeproofs.io Spec: https://timeproofs.io/proofspec.html

Honest feedback welcome.