From which reference frame would it not rotate?
2. Yes, everything "at rest" on earth is in fact rotating at the rate the earth rotates. If you stand on the equator at midday and do not rotate you will be standing on your head at midnight.
This is always true. The origin is just a thing that other things are relative to. It's just as possible to define an origin un the real world as it is on a piece of graph paper.
I'm probably butchering this, but in my mind it is something like:
1. From the squirrels frame of reference and local coordinate system, the man has remained "in front" of the squirrel. The squirrel is orienting and rotating in sync with the man and therefore has not observed that the man has "gone round" it.
2. From our perspective (and on reflection from the man), the man has circled the squirrel in the global coordinate system of the scene.
As the reader we assume that our perspective is the authoritative one, but I am sure the squirrel disagrees.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/can-math-help-you-escape-a-hu...
beardyw•1h ago
beardyw•1h ago
xlbuttplug2•1h ago
xnorswap•1h ago
Has the man have gone around the squirrel and the squirrel around the man?
If it's only radii less than the other, where is the limit?
To get it I think I have to re-frame it like this:
If you hold out an object toward the centre, you clearly go around it when completing an orbit.
If you keep extending that to the origin but then go beyond, so your arm is longer than the radius, then you still go around it, until your arm reaches twice the radius.
xlbuttplug2•1h ago
But yeah if your circuit completely fits inside the other person's circuit, then you've been gone around, no matter how slow or fast you both are.
moconnor•1h ago
xlbuttplug2•1h ago