We noticed that most group dining conflicts don’t happen because people disagree, but because unsafe constraints (allergies, dietary rules, medical conditions) are discovered too late. So we built a small experiment: instead of ranking restaurants, we eliminate incompatible options first, before any discussion starts. The goal isn’t to “choose the best place”, but to remove the wrong ones early, so groups can reach a decision faster and more safely.

We’re testing this with small real groups (friends, families), and I’m curious if others here have seen similar patterns, or edge cases we might be missing. Happy to answer questions and learn from feedback.