I should investigate this, though. thanks for the heads up !
Never once did I look at any portfolio. Actually, no one had any they wanted to show!
After screening the CV, they got a 1 hour first round for cultural fit and technical foundations, a simple take home exercise (e.g. build a service that sends emails), in the second round they had to go through their code and justify their choices and in the second part the had to code review the bad submission of a former applicant and in the third part they had to draw up how they‘d extend and embed that service in a microservice landscape.
2 rounds. Never had a „mishire“. Hiring is that easy.
btw, I don't advertise it but junior devs can also use the tool for take home assignments (not sure if it would be a good or a bad thing as a recruiter)
err0r500•2h ago
After reviewing hundreds (thousands?) of junior developer portfolios, I realized two things:
Junior devs do their best but don’t know the red flags senior developers spot immediately Nobody tells them
So I built https://yourlead.dev to automate myself : it analyzes GitHub repositories and: - flags the issues a lead developer would raise during a real code review - explains why they matter - gives concrete tips on how to fix them - and even helps prepare for technical interviews
I spent a lot of time fine-tuning it based on my experience across different contexts (because expectations are very different in an early startup, a scale-up, or a bank).
btw, I'm giving free reviews in exchange for feedback ;)
milarepa7•2h ago
err0r500•2h ago
kl3ist•2h ago
err0r500•2h ago
hahahahhaah•2h ago
err0r500•1h ago
morcus•1h ago
note: I'm not a junior dev and the repo I'm trying to analyze is more of a side project than a portfolio piece. This may or may not be a feature relevant to your actual target audience.
err0r500•1h ago
err0r500•1h ago