Not by GitHub, but isn't act supposed to be that?
> For the love of all that is holy, don’t let GitHub Actions
> manage your logic. Keep your scripts under your own damn
> control and just make the Actions call them!
The pain is real. I think everyone that's ever used GitHub actions has come to this conclusion. An ideal action has 2 steps: (1) check out the code, (2) invoke a sane script that you can test locally.Honestly, I wonder if a better workflow definition would just have a single input: a single command to run. Remove the temptation to actually put logic in the actions workflow.
I agree that that should be reasonable but unfortunately I can tell you that not all developers (including seniors) naturally arrive at such conclusion no.
I find GitHub Actions abhorrent in a way that I never found a CI/CD system before...
If you can't run the same scripts locally (minus external hosted service/API) then how do you debug them w/o running the whole pipeline?
gg watch action
Finds the most recent of currently running action for the branch you have checked out. Among other things.
spockz•18m ago