Same as the tariffs or other deprecations. Unless/until the average person feels some pain, nothing is real. Change is scary, and if the status quo is palatable or at least "not too bad", human nature is to go along. And people are (quite?) pain adverse so paths w/o pain are easier to accept.

People have prattled on about how the tree of liberty needs to be watered by blood from time to time. The NRA claims its purpose vs. tyranny. Well, there's a chance that events will call their bluffs.

People's movement start when there is an implicit assurance of sustained outside support. Many feel the pain but they will turn it into action because they don't know if they can trust their peers who are feeling the same pain that the peers will act too as much as they talk. Because talk is cheap. But when people start seeing some outside support then only they start rallying for their goal. That's what i gather from the Indian Freedom movement and from the "Arab Springs"