People who worry about AI taking their jobs often lack ambition, or worse, a sense of mission. Too many engineers tie their identity to a title or a role, mistaking employment for purpose.
Building in the age of AI means stepping away from that mindset. It means pursuing things that matter deeply to you, to the people around you, or simply ideas you want to see exist.
If your current role supports that, it’s a bonus. If it doesn’t, then it’s just income fuel to invest in what you actually care about.
The same goes for technology. Engineers cling to stacks the way they cling to roles. If a tool solves your problem, great. If not, use it as a learning fuel for something you want to build.
Note: Thoughts are personal, rephrased using LLM
Juliate•1h ago
And then, no worry if some salesman actually impairs your (time, education, work) investment with some unproven promises your boss happens to believe (or that competing bosses believe, which in turn downs the whole market area you are in)?
Or then, no worry if some salesman steals (without denying it) your own work and investment, to resell it for a profit to their customers?
Engineers are the _least_ impacted with GenAI currently being pushed on all of us.
If a tool solves your problem great. If the tool becomes the problem, the tool and its maker should seriously grasp the issue rather than denying it and doubling down.