frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Fixing retail with land value capture

https://worksinprogress.co/issue/fixing-retail-with-land-value-capture/
2•marojejian•1m ago•2 comments

Show HN: ZkzkAgent – a self-hosted AI assistant for Linux

https://github.com/zkzkGamal/zkzkAgent
1•zkaria-gamal-11•1m ago•0 comments

Palo Alto chose not to tie China to hacking campaign for fear of retaliation

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/palo-alto-chose-not-tie-china-hacking-campaign-fear-retaliati...
1•speckx•2m ago•0 comments

Vercel-like development setup for Django using Caddy

https://mliezun.com/2026/02/11/vercel-like-domain-django
4•nickdevx•3m ago•0 comments

Why Your AI Agent Dashboard Is Lying to You

https://vindler.solutions/blog/ai-agent-dashboard-lying
1•cdutra•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Free AI background remover – no signup, no watermarks, unlimited use

https://removebgtransparent.com/
1•detroitwebsites•4m ago•0 comments

EPA Boss Lee Zeldin Suggests U.S. May Plan to Axe Start-Stop Systems This Week

https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a70314040/epa-boss-lee-zeldin-us-plans-stop-start-systems/
2•tokyobreakfast•5m ago•0 comments

Plottie – first research visualization agent

https://ai.plottie.art
1•jianhuamert•5m ago•0 comments

URLs with Trailing Punctuation

https://www.redblobgames.com/blog/2026-02-12-urls-with-trailing-punctuation/
1•speckx•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Explain curl|bash installer scripts

https://curl-bash-explain.dev/
1•senko•8m ago•0 comments

Google Handed ICE User Data Without Court Order

https://reclaimthenet.org/ice-google-subpoena-amandla-thomas-johnson-data-disclosure
3•mikece•8m ago•0 comments

CodeSpeak: Software Engineering with AI

https://www.codespeak.dev/
1•todsacerdoti•8m ago•0 comments

After 20 Years, This Scientist Changed How We Understand Bird Language

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doj_wt9ER_Q
1•timetraveller26•9m ago•0 comments

Google offers voluntary exit packages to employees not 'embracing' AI

https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/news/google-offers-voluntary-exit-packages-to-employees-not-embra...
2•millisecond•10m ago•0 comments

TileIR

https://ianbarber.blog/2026/02/11/tileir/
1•matt_d•11m ago•0 comments

Msgvault: Archive all your email and chat offline. Search in milliseconds

https://www.msgvault.io/
1•nateb2022•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Happy Coder – Run Claude Code and Codex from Anywhere

https://happy.engineering/
1•ex3ndr•13m ago•0 comments

Sparc and Alpha CPU Ports Still Seeing Activity in 2026 with Linux 7.0

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.0-SPARC-Alpha-m68k
1•mikece•13m ago•0 comments

SWE-AGI: benchmarking spec-driven software construction

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09447
1•mustaphah•14m ago•1 comments

Redka: Redis Re-Implemented with SQL

https://github.com/nalgeon/redka
1•nateb2022•14m ago•0 comments

Are We Having the Wrong AI Dreams?

https://blog.jetbrains.com/ai/2026/02/are-we-having-the-wrong-ai-dreams/
1•mikece•15m ago•0 comments

Tesla sales in China crash 45% to lowest level in over three years

https://electrek.co/2026/02/12/tesla-tsla-sales-in-china-crash-45-to-lowest-level-in-over-three-y...
3•breve•15m ago•0 comments

Did YouTube change how it handles uBlock?

2•tefloon69•15m ago•2 comments

Fluux Messenger 0.13.0: A Modern Cross Platform XMPP Client

https://www.process-one.net/blog/fluux-messenger-0-13/
1•neustradamus•17m ago•0 comments

What's the difference between a "disc" and a "disk"?

https://support.apple.com/en-gb/100749
2•IndySun•18m ago•0 comments

I was insulted today – AI style

https://forkingmad.blog/insulted-today-ai/
5•speckx•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hacker News for OpenClaw Agents

1•laurex•19m ago•0 comments

A Wave of Unexplained Bot Traffic Is Sweeping the Web

https://www.wired.com/story/made-in-china-niche-websites-are-seeing-a-surge-of-mysterious-traffic...
3•jaredwiener•19m ago•0 comments

How to Lie with Charts

https://handsondataviz.org/how-to-lie-with-charts.html
2•hakkikonu•20m ago•0 comments

Warhammer 40K Fanart Gallery

https://40k.gallery/
1•sph•20m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

A party balloon shut down El Paso International Airport; estimated cost –$573k

https://log.jasongodfrey.info/questions/The-Most-Expensive-Party-Balloon-in-History
92•heifer•1h ago

Comments

throwaway0q5347•1h ago
> Who among us hasn’t, at some point, mistaken a party balloon for a cartel drone? Let him cast the first stone.
esseph•1h ago
It's a shame the F-22 wasn't publicly allowed to get its second A2A kill! ;)
toast0•9m ago
Fyi, the f-22 logged a second kill shortly after the first:

https://apnews.com/article/pentagon-shoots-down-unknown-flyi...

throwup238•1h ago
I once mistook a Scottish lake monster for a narcosub, but can’t say I’ve ever mistaken a party balloon for a narcodrone.
joe_mamba•1h ago
Firstly, how is the world's most powerful military afraid of "cartel drones"? Don't they already have some sci-fi laser/EW gizmos to take care of those considering how much taxpayer dollars go to the defense sector?

Secondly, contrary to popular belief, cartel leaders are smart enough to know not to directly mess with and attract the wrath of the US military when that's not good for their core business.

jeffbee•1h ago
The laser gizmo is central to this story.
milesskorpen•1h ago
Reading between the lines, it sounds like the FAA maybe did not trust CBP to "test" operate the high powered laser near civilian aviation, in part given that they mistakenly identified a balloon for a cartel drone.
nixosbestos•53m ago
FAA sounds kinda woke to me, idk.
bigbuppo•12m ago
Well generally speaking you don't want air traffic controllers falling asleep at the job.
esseph•1h ago
I am not sure how much the average person realizes that drones in both a reconnaissance and observation role or an attack role have changed the nature of warfare and have threatened localities.

We don't have good tools to deal with them, especially groups.

It would be trivial, right now, for a few fpv drones to cause extreme chaos somewhere like a popular highway in Los Angeles, and the amount of economic damage that could do.

It's a technological shift in how warfare is conducted, but from a protection standpoint, the tools aren't great to counter them yet.

sixothree•59m ago
If we had tools, the airport would never have been shut down.
andrewflnr•58m ago
Yeah the answer to

> Don't they already have some sci-fi laser/EW gizmos to take care of those considering how much taxpayer dollars go to the defense sector?

Is pretty much a flat "no". Or at least "not yet".

2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
It wasn't the military it was DHS.
outside1234•1h ago
This wasn't the military. It was DHS, who is lead by the cosplaying cowboy hat lady, so this sort of incompetence should be completely expected.
opello•59m ago
Really making you wonder why does DHS have direct access to this hardware?
andrewflnr•56m ago
It's pretty directly relevant to "homeland security", anti-terrorism, etc. I wouldn't say that's the problem.

Make no mistake, the actual drone terrorism is coming. I guess you could say that only the actual military should handle it, but... Why?

organsnyder•50m ago
Nuclear weapons are also directly relevant to "homeland security" (at least as a deterrent), yet I doubt many would be in favor of putting them under DHS as well.
kube-system•46m ago
Nuclear weapons are controlled more specifically by law. Lasers are not.
andrewflnr•17m ago
That both of those are labelled "homeland security" is almost a coincidence. Strategic security vs a fancy brand name for counter-terrorism.
opello•40m ago
I may have foolishly accepted the premise of incompetence in posing my question. Basically it seemed to me like the complaint was untrained/experienced (incompetent) people were deciding/deploying the fancy laser munition. That seemed worth of rebuke. After some brief searching I'm less clear about who took what action.

It seemed more like giving police forces (or allowing them to buy) APCs, armored Humvees, etc. Less trained/experienced people using things made for a different use case, ultimately exposes the people to more risk. Instead of say coordinating with the DOD to deploy the system and personnel accepting requests or being the decision maker for "take action" after some level of expertise in the area of evaluating targets and whatever else need be considered has also contributed to the process.

I don't know how it does work, let alone have enough context to imagine how it should. While I do agree "things to deter drones are appropriate border defense tools," the rest of the details painted a picture that seemed less reasonable.

andrewflnr•20m ago
Mostly agree. I wouldn't give high powered lasers to local police forces either. My point is that the problem is less to do with lasers and anti-drone tech in particular than with incompetence and abuse of power generally. Lasers are just the way it manifested in this instance.
joe_mamba•53m ago
https://youtu.be/uo63QQsm5Dw?si=SvD7JZrpJbVXF7nf&t=91
kube-system•53m ago
Lasers are not particularly controlled by regulation. Most people in the US can own a class 4 laser if they want.

Also, most laws that do restrict weapons specifically exempt government law enforcement anyway.

opello•36m ago
Okay, but they're not like styropyro on YouTube here... presumably the DHS people are using the whatever government weapons contractor made device, which is going to come with more nuance, controls, targeting system, etc. than whatever someone might buy off the shelf or cobble together independently.

I think it might have actually been DOD people operating the system even, but there's conflicting reporting and I'm not sure. Either way it seems like there was at the very least some kind of coordination failure.

bakies•51m ago
Pentagon gave it to them. The heads of both these orgs are incompetent and should be impeached.
davidw•50m ago
I thought I read that they borrowed it from the actual military, which tends to be a little bit more cautious with these things.
kube-system•59m ago
Customs and Border Patrol is not the military. They weren't "afraid" of it, their job is to control the border. They do have laser gizmos, that's what they used.
Forgeties79•54m ago
>their job is to control the border

Thank god they’re here defending us from rogue party balloons. Where would we be without their vigilance?

kube-system•48m ago
I think it's clear they were mistaken, I don't really think the sarcasm is adding to the conversation.
Forgeties79•45m ago
Fair enough
dcrazy•42m ago
The problem isn’t the mistake, it’s the recklessness.
Johnny555•40m ago
Don't they already have some sci-fi laser/EW gizmos to take care of those

Isn't that the problem? Someone (but apparently DHS, not the military though there were military staff present, maybe?) had one of those sci-fi laser gizmos and used it without authorization or proper notifications.

I don't think we'll ever learn the real details about exactly what happened, the audit trail (if there was one) is probably in shredder baskets by now

silisili•1h ago
Is there any reputable source for this claim? Apologies if I missed it but didn't see one linked in the article. I ask because it's not what I'd read or understood yesterday.
milesskorpen•1h ago
Yes: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/airspace-closure-followed-spat-...

FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford on Tuesday night decided to close the airspace — without alerting White House, Pentagon or Homeland Security officials, sources said.

...

Customs and Border Protection used the laser weapon earlier this week after training from the U.S. military, according to multiple sources familiar with its deployment. Officials had recently given the FAA a 10-day window in which the technology would be used.

The anti-drone technology was launched near the southern border to shoot down what appeared to be foreign drones. The flying material turned out to be a party balloon, sources said. One balloon was shot down, several sources said.

The Mexican cartels have been running drones on the border lately, the sources said, but it was unclear how many were hit by the military's anti-UAS (unmanned aircraft systems) technology this week. One official said at least one cartel drone was successfully disabled.

silisili•1h ago
Thanks!
Telemakhos•1h ago
Reuters has a slightly different take on this:

> Three U.S. military officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said U.S. Customs and Border Protection had been using the technology without issues before Tuesday's shutdown and expressed confusion as to why the shutdown was deemed necessary. [0]

It was definitely the army [1] who fired the laser causing the shutdown of El Paso airport, but the army doesn't seem to understand the alarm on the part of the FAA, because DHS (Border Protection) has been using it for some time now without the same alarm from the FAA. Someone at the FAA reacted differently to this army firing than they had to previous DHS firings.

[0] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/senator-says-el-paso-airpor... [1] https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/aeroviron...

stefan_•1h ago
What you read yesterday was most likely a deliberate lie to cover up dysfunctional federal government agencies:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/airspace-closure-followed-spat-...

gunapologist99•22m ago
All of the "reputable" sources appear to be relying on "highly placed" anonymous sources, and many of the articles conflict with each other.

Could have been little green men! But what exactly happened is probably (or should be) classified.

KyleBerezin•13m ago
No. Only unnamed sources. I would say it is more likely a balloon than not though. Both stories are perfectly believable, a mylar balloon is def going to show up on radar, and the cartel does use drones. I think the balloon story is more believable though because the cartels would gain almost nothing from this, and if it was a drone I would expect photos of the debris by now.
Jeema101•1h ago
Alexa play 'Nena - 99 Red Balloons'...
virgulino•1h ago
We posted simultaneously! :)
Jordan-117•1h ago
More alarmingly, the laser weapon was deployed before the FAA actually shut down the airspace:

https://apnews.com/article/faa-el-paso-texas-air-space-close...

I'd say these trigger-happy clowns chasing tough-guy optics are going to get innocent people killed, but then they already have -- multiple times.

mlinhares•1h ago
Yeah, a bit late for that. But this would likely kill more at once than they've had before, so would land a new record.
outside1234•1h ago
Have you not seen the cowboy hat that she wears tho?
wahnfrieden•1h ago
The news had reported that it was Mexican cartel drones, not a balloon, and that is the position that our officials maintain, so it is good, so good, and patriotic actually

If some American civilians (if not illegals) flying by at the time of the foreign incursion are put in harm's way as sacrificial collateral damage in order to protect us in the heat of the moment, that's just the cost of freedom and we should all celebrate it, else leave for somewhere abroad with values that better align with an urge to welcome foreign invasion. Such a tragedy would be so easily avoided if the borders were simply closed and everyone stopped welcoming Mexican cartels into their communities, right? Balloon news is a distraction.

selimthegrim•57m ago
Was the party balloon made in China?
bakies•56m ago
who did the news cite? the liar admin?
foxyv•33m ago
> "The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory."
hypeatei•53m ago
Remember, this is the same side that espoused "meritocracy" as their number one virtue. Instead, we got a cabinet full of loyalists and fascists that decided doing joint missions between the DoD and Border Patrol was a good idea.

Firing lasers at party balloons in American cities, everyone else be damned. OPSEC is clear.

ajross•45m ago
Even more alarmingly, a US cabinet secretary came out with a public statement about the incident that was a complete fabrication (labelling it a "cartel drone incursion"), has issued no retraction, and no one seems to care.

(Less alarmingly but more personal: my personal prediction to this effect, expressing distrust about statements like this in real time, got flagged right here on HN because apparently our leaders lying to our faces about news relevant to our community is "politics" and unseemly to discuss.)

virgulino•1h ago
"99 Luftballons", Mariachi remix.
jihadjihad•1h ago

  99 ministros de guerra
  Fósforos y bidones de gasolina
  Se creían gente muy astuta
  Ya olfateaban un gran botín
  Gritaron: “¡Guerra!” y querían poder
  Hombre, ¿quién lo hubiera pensado?
  Que alguna vez llegaría tan lejos
  Por culpa de 99 globos
debugnik•38m ago
That doesn't rhyme at all though.
kelseyfrog•1h ago
The rate of return on this is phenomenal.

A 53" balloon costs $9.99. You could shut down all large and medium hubs in the US for $629.37/day. The asymmetry is astounding and I'm surprised we don't defend against this kind of attack more efficiently.

grayhatter•57m ago
I'm equally surprised we don't fend off these rampant goblin threats too!

More pragmatically, such a system would cost multiple millions, and would take years to actually stabilize in a manner that would recover the fictitious costs to shutting down the airports with gaps. (i.e. I'm surprised you so easily bought into the 500k figure)

All because a bunch of idiots lost track of their one balloon, once? The asymmetry is banal. There are cheaper ways that require less planning than that.

kelseyfrog•48m ago
I avoided the 500k figure and instead just mentioned airport shutdowns.

I'm surprised you saw it in my comment. It's reminiscent of an airport seeing a would be drone.

Forgeties79•56m ago
I think the general assumption is that the US government is competent enough to know the difference between a party balloon and a real threat, but apparently it is not. At least not under the current admin.
duskwuff•30m ago
America's war on balloons has been ongoing for some time:

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/18/1158048921/pico-balloon-k9yo

CobrastanJorji•55m ago
Doesn't usually work. There are over a thousand incursions by unmanned aircraft systems along the U.S.-Mexico border each month, per the NORAD commander: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/370778... . They pretty much never result in shutting down air space or launching missiles.

Responding to a single party balloon with a giant laser, thus causing a saner government official to close the airspace because some moron is firing giant lasers into the air, is unusual. Probably not a usable asymmetric attack vector.

bakies•52m ago
wow maybe we should stop giving the law enforcement orgs weapons of war
gunapologist99•27m ago
'saner govt official because moron firing giant lasers into the air' - lasers just go everywhere at once and hit everything in the air, into the stratosphere? it's a big sky and gets bigger the higher you go.
aussiegreenie•1h ago
Imagine if there had been 99 balloons?
righthand•1h ago
So can we dismantle other security theater with balloons? Can we make a balloon for Tsa that is harmless and will cost too much to fight and demonstrates the pointlessness of Tsa?
ceejayoz•1h ago
> Can we make a balloon for Tsa that is harmless and will cost too much to fight and demonstrates the pointlessness of Tsa?

You don't need a balloon. A real gun will do.

https://abcnews.com/US/tsa-fails-tests-latest-undercover-ope...

"The news of the failure comes two years after ABC News reported that secret teams from the DHS found that the TSA failed 95 percent of the time to stop inspectors from smuggling weapons or explosive materials through screening."

mothballed•1h ago
Is it even legal to release a party baloon in class D airspace?
kube-system•42m ago
It's illegal everywhere in Texas

https://1023thebullfm.com/texas-bans-outdoor-balloon-release...

onlypassingthru•35m ago
Yet another 5 year old doing covert ops?
kotaKat•30m ago
You guys said that we did this for the show!
blitzar•51m ago
The Secretary of Homeland Security thought the balloon was her dog and treated it as such (/s?)
CrzyLngPwd•47m ago
There is no defence against an enemy that can cause hysteria so easily.
josefritzishere•46m ago
We are on the dumbest timeline.
fiatpandas•6m ago
Is this the case of radar automatic targeting unable to distinguish between a balloon and a drone. Or was this a border guy manually pulling the trigger with bad eyesight?