This has happened before. I think given the legalisms around pets, ownership, responsibility, all of the chip registry companies should have been required to put the data into escrow, with a recovery plan and a handler of last resort in the form of a CSV file or something.
sigwinch•15m ago
DNS would be fine, too. At minimum, a LOC record for a helpful neighbor.
treesknees•25m ago
Is it safe to get multiple chips? They’re about the size of a grain of rice, so it shouldn’t be too unwieldy to get chipped from a couple of different vendors at the same time. With a chip, GPS collar, maybe an AirTag, that’s about all you can do besides lots of training.
yftsui•5m ago
The chip will still be working after 24PetWatch is gone, you can enroll the same serial to more providers i.e. AKC Reunite.
yftsui•11m ago
The microchip stores nothing but a serial number. I don’t quite understand the design that you would need a vendor to maintain a database between the serial and owner information, why not just store owner phone number like a traditional dog tag?
tomyedwab•7m ago
The title is misleading: the chip isn't useless, it is basically NFC and can be read just fine. The number on it can be looked up in a registry to notify the owner of a lost pet. I believe there is nothing preventing you from registering the same number with multiple registries. Hope that helps.
ggm•1h ago
sigwinch•15m ago