And frankly moaning about this used to be right wing conspiracies a few years ago so yey for another pendulum swing...
Obviously I’m kidding, and something is rotten
Yeah, right. My barely mobile 90-year-old parents, one of whom has Parkinson's, are just going to pack up and go. They know perfectly well that they have a captive audience.
Thankfully, my mother died before the acquisition, and my father died last week, only a few months after the acquisition, so I don't have to deal with this any more. But caveat emptor: if you ever go into a retirement home, think about what will happen if they change ownership. Even if it looks great, or even acceptable, now, there is no guarantee that it will still be great, or even acceptable, tomorrow, unless you somehow manage to negotiate such a guarantee. I have no idea what a contract provision like that would even look like. But I am going to be facing this problem myself some day, so I'd love to hear ideas.
calvinmorrison•1h ago
giwook•1h ago
What might be a more feasible solution?
daveguy•1h ago
lokar•1h ago
Esophagus4•35m ago
jareklupinski•1h ago
lotsofpulp•15m ago
mmooss•46m ago
bsder•4m ago
All corporate entities require a registration to operate in a state if they have a physical presence.
In this instance, you can also pass a law along the lines of "After setup, all care homes are required to spend 90/95/99% of their income on direct care of the residents or your charter gets revoked." This would prevent the incentives to buy them in the first place.
gotwaz•29m ago