We spoke to the man making viral Lego-style AI videos for Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjd8jrd1vnyo

62•breve•1h ago

Comments

dtagames•1h ago

They didn't include the latest and best one, a terrific rap video that got the producer banned from YouTube.

A press website posted this archive copy:

https://youtu.be/5G9DNx7xIIc?si=XxIep3pySW7ZS8zb

genxy•1h ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G9DNx7xIIc share link wouldn't load

hsuduebc2•1h ago

Why did he get banned?

oa335•1h ago

“Violent content” according to their twitter account.

https://x.com/ExplosiveMediaa/status/2042388973729763746

Barbing•21m ago

Never would have found that. Poked around, interesting:

"In response to your completely valid request, and in line with the boycott of the US dollar, we have closed our USDT wallet. Please use Bitcoin or Solana instead."

https://xcancel.com/ExplosiveMediaa/status/20419442863300406...

davidw•58m ago

IDK what YT's standards are for banning things, but like 5 seconds in, they let loose with some pretty anti-semitic tropes.

deaux•54m ago

All of the lyrics that reference it are talking about the country, the government and its president. If them being pictured as making a financial trade with the US president is an "anti-semitic trope", it becomes impossible to satirize these real-world events. Is there a different real trope that I missed?

crooked-v•24m ago

"The Jews are secretly running things to the detriment of the common person" has been a right-wing conspiracy theory for a long time, going well before even the invention of modern politics.

With that said, I think the video, looked at as a propaganda piece, threads the needle about as well as possible - it sticks strictly to referring to Israel as a country, but also just as importantly frames Trump as the primary actor rather than taking direction from Israel.

oa335•1h ago

Non-paywalled link: https://archive.is/Rocgc

hsuduebc2•1h ago

The worst part is that, in their most famous video linked above, they are not even telling blatant lies for once. The author was practically handed material for that video on a silver platter. That is quite disturbing.

jmann99999•1h ago

Has anyone figured out what AI tool the "Mr. Explosive" team is using to make these? I find the quality of the LEGO animation to be really good. I have made stop-motion LEGO videos in the past, and this is impressive.

Thanks for any insight.

drnick1•1h ago

It's quite clear in view of recent events that the mullahs aren't interested in negotiating for the good of their people. It is obvious to anyone that if Iran put all the resources they poured into secret nuclear facilities and missiles into economic development, infrastructure, and education, Iran would be in a completely different place today. Sadly, the regime's primary objective is self-preservation, and the only language it understands is violence.

dottjt•1h ago

This comment is completely ignorant of at least the past 80+ years of Middle East history.

kQq9oHeAz6wLLS•18m ago

This comment is completely devoid of refuting evidence.

stavros•1h ago

> It is obvious to anyone that if Iran put all the resources they poured into secret nuclear facilities and missiles into economic development, infrastructure, and education, Iran would be in a completely different place today

Funny, I was just thinking that about the US.

drnick1•47m ago

> Funny, I was just thinking that about the US.

I don't know how anyone in good faith can compare Iran's economy to the U.S.

stavros•46m ago

They can't. And yet, it's true that the US would be a different place if it spent more money on education and less on missiles.

Ray20•13m ago

> if it spent more money on education and less on missiles

Wait, isn't the US has literally the highest spending on education in the world? And it is precisely the highest spending in the world on missiles that make it possible. So less money on missiles would mean less money on education.

colechristensen•55m ago

Eh, it's also clear that nations without nuclear arms exist at the whims of great powers, particularly now. "behave and we'll let you have some prosperity unless you need defense in which case good luck" isn't exactly a strong argument.

And the people in power in Iran actively are not in favor of the good of their people, a large proportion of which want nothing to do with their religious fundamentalism.

How do you convince oppressive zealots to play nice for peace when their whole existence rests on having enemies? "death to America!" being the popular chant at political rallies.

themafia•53m ago

> Iran put all the resources they poured into secret nuclear facilities and missiles

Iran has agreed to open them for inspection several times.

> into economic development, infrastructure, and education

They're embargoed to a point where they can't do this.

> Iran would be in a completely different place today.

Iran's currency is backed by the crown jewels the Shah left behind.

oa335•50m ago

Iran spends about 2% of its GDP on defense, not that much compared to most countries in the world.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locat...

The issue isn’t the amount of spending; they could spend nothing and would still get bombed because they are antagonistic to the US and its allies/vassals.

nivertech•41m ago

statistics == lies

abernard1•31m ago

"antagonistic"

They are a theocratic regime which is not supported by 80% of its population. Being gay is punishable by death. They employ surveillance from China to ensure hijabs are worn by women at all times. They ban access to the internet. Chants of "Death to America" are their government's routine greeting for 50 years. They place military equipment in schools and hospitals deliberately, viewing US compassion as a weakness. They recruit child soldiers and have them publicly stationed at military targets.

There is definitely "antagonism," but to act as if the Iranian people would not bomb their own government if they could... it's a bit much.

ChrisArchitect•1h ago

Previously:

The team behind a pro-Iran, Lego-themed viral-video campaign

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47661065

vvpan•57m ago

I know, I know, this is not the platform. But however I dislike the war (which sounds across-the-board unpopular except with Republican senators) having love for a regime that massacres protestors by the thousands is cruel and perverse.

bigbinary•44m ago

If you are American, we are also ruled by a regime that kills thousands of innocents in the name of whatever our president feels like

zoklet-enjoyer•40m ago

I don't think most people have love for the Iranian government. We hate war and bullies

kakacik•39m ago

I 'love' this sort of posh framing. Is there a war you like for a change? Thousands of civilians are dying on whims of an old mentally sick man, with nobody having balls to stop him anyhow. He can claim he is setting up a genocide of entire nation to whole world and... nothing? I know, one of the less bloody senseless wars US waged, ending up defeated again, but still. Everybody's US taxes are helping financing this.

Nothing substantial achieved, at least not positive for US. Israel is toying with you like with a donkey and carrot on stick. Is that not insulting to your own pride and self-worth? You lost all partners globally, everybody hates dealing with US and rolls their eyes on another daily set of whims of your oligarchs.

China is damn happy, russia is very happy so there is certainly that. And Iran, they will keep doing their thing, regardless of what you do and cia has to accept there isnt much they can change about that. Iran would be stupid to not throw everything into getting nuclear bomb for themselves. russians would be stupid to not help them there at this point.

b00ty4breakfast•27m ago

Criticizing the US's actions against Iran is in no way condoning the things that the regime has done to it's own citizens. Especially since those actions are contributing directly to the Iranian people's hardship.

I'm not saying that you, personally, are being deliberately obtuse and unnuanced about this (and I'm not even saying that there aren't people who are sympathizing with the Iranian regime) but there are absolutely people being deliberately obtuse and unnuanced about it.

georgeburdell•54m ago

It’s really bizarre to me that, even before the war, the mainstream western media ignored the 30k protesters getting massacred in January. They have been using kid gloves with the Iranian regime for some time, like this article exemplifies.

SV_BubbleTime•53m ago

How much control does China have on what comes across your screen do you think? I suspect it is not none.

Barbing•29m ago

(not parent)

Something's been bothering me, and it's how little control our leadership has over what comes across their screens.

1 - We've read the reputable reporting on the troll farms.

2 - We haven't seen reporting that the problem is fixed.

3 - We know our politicians are on social media.

Presumably, every single day, American politicians see at least one post from someone pretending to be their constituent. How are they avoiding conscious, if not subconscious, influence?

6yyyyyy•27m ago

The protests and killings were extremely widely reported at the time.

fragmede•19m ago

Without access to the Internet from the Iranian people, the media reach was limited. It was not widely reported.

ipaddr•17m ago

The accurate number is 6,000 but someone from Israel's side said it could be up to 30,000.

Protesters are armed solders with guns organized by IDF and CIA.

culi•1m ago

Specifically, Human Rights Activists in Iran's count is 6,488. Iran International is the main outlet that claimed more (first 10k, then 30k and now 40k). Iran International is actually Saudi-owned and technically based in the UK but, as The Guardian's investigation showed, is not a real journalistic institution. It's just a propaganda outlet for Mohammed bin Salman

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/31/concern-over-u...

abernard1•50m ago

Most likely motivational media for their new child recruits: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/04/iran-recruitm...

deaux•45m ago

A lot of comments talking about the Iranian regime. The videos I've seen say nothing positive about the Iranian regime, all they do is rightfully criticize the US regime that carried out an assault out on Iran, which as expected has led to nothing but more suffering for the Iranians, without improving their lives. That the Iranian regime killed thousands of protestors says nothing about both the legitimacy and the effects of the attack on Iran, and believing otherwise is caused by being raised on US propaganda.

If you truly care about the Iranian people, you'd be agreeing with these videos, because the attack has only made their lives worse. And this was completely expected, look at how the last two times of the US attacking a country in the Middle East went.

drnick1•39m ago

While civilian casualties are unavoidable in any conflict, the idea here is that if the regime falls, the face of the Middle East will completely change. Just look at Iran pre-1979 and imagine what it would be today had the theocracy not mercilessly oppressed the population for half a century. Perhaps this creator should use AI to generate a video of the IRGC killing an estimated 30,000 of their own people[0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_massacres

ozozozd•33m ago

One might wonder what helped the theocracy take over the pre-1979 Iran.

One need not wonder. Your first guess is correct!

mentalfist•32m ago

There is a certain leap between "civilian casualties are unavoidable" and "a civilization Is going to be destroyed and sent back to the stone age through war crimes"

drnick1•27m ago

Trump's comments are quite obviously saber-rattling. Until now at least, the U.S. hasn't executed 30,000+ Iranians in a short period of time, and countless more over the past five decades.

bulbar•10m ago

Regime change isn't the real goal here, is it? Haven't followed closely, but to me it seems the goal is to just destroy Iran as a regional power, with dire consequences for its population.

blizdiddy•32m ago

The only thing any of that has to do with the US is that the US backed that theocracy! We cannot unilaterally violate all international law and sovereignty without Congress and our allies… that’s obvious though so what are you talking about?

Larrikin•28m ago

This is a pointless complaint if the person who has ended up in charge is worse. There's no point in imagining what could have been. The world is dealing with what exist now.

superb_dev•24m ago

Some civilian casualties may be unavoidable in a conflict sure, but the US and Israel are not trying very hard

rolymath•20m ago

Maybe the US should have intervened in 1979. Oh, wait.

crooked-v•18m ago

Except that the effect here has not been to overturn the regime, but rather to put a hardliner into absolute power while also murdering his entire family in the middle of diplomatic negotations. And then murdering plenty of innocent people, like that school full of literal children, to ensure that the country rallies around him.

oa335•36m ago

One of my friends in Iran who was previously critical of the government is now highly supportive of them. I wonder how many other Iranians have become supporters of the government during this war.

culi•10m ago

I've heard the same from many Iranians I know. Western media presented the protests as an attempt to overthrow the order but it seems many protestors were simply calling for reform.

Ray20•3m ago

> seems many protestors were simply calling for reform

I mean, when you would have literally death penalty for attempt to overthrow the order, of course you will be "simply calling for reform".

shubhamjain•40m ago

The article sounds like the author is visibly upset why these videos are being shared, which are mere “propaganda” to them. “Slop”, “factually inaccurate”, “Iran, the most repressive country for press freedom.”

“We spoke” is doing a more than necessary work here. Maybe just ask a few things and wrote what we had decided to write. My problem isn’t with those claims, which are true, but setting a narrative where a single country is exploiting social media for propaganda while clearly ignoring the crimes of much worse actors here.

Johnny_Bonk•31m ago

Day after day, reality seems less and less real… when I was a kid I didn’t think war would include LEGO style psyops videos…

b00ty4breakfast•21m ago

condemning the US != condoning the Iranian regime. This is not rocket appliance, you guys; saying it's wrong to murder cat burglars while they eat dinner with their kids is not an endorsement of burglary (especially when the murder is about collecting life insurance rather than stopping burglary)

Scrum Master Interview Questions for the AI Era

Show HN: Two Claudes collaborating through shared memory on a $100 mini-PC

The Brainrot Industrial Complex

Iran and US fail to reach a deal (conomictimes.indiatimes.com)

Unauthenticated Object Write Vulnerability in MinIO

Show HN: Drowning in messages after 6 months as a CSM, I built a cat timer

Weather Prediction Markets Are Booming. Can They Improve Forecasts?

The Universal Standard Book Number

'It's a special thing to be on Planet Earth': Artemis crew welcomed home in

An LLM That Watches Your Logs and Kills Compromised Services at 3am

The biggest advance in AI since the LLM

Apollo Domain/IX User's Guide [pdf]

Show HN: Minimalist template for scientific and academic resumes

Electric Rail Bike for Abandoned Railroads [video]

Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major US banks

A new interpretation of the Riemann Hypothesis based on wave interaction (Flux)

Excellence Is a Habit

Ideas for marketing a dev centric product (2019)

Is the 'Holy Grail of batteries' ready to bless us with its presence?

New town every hour blue sky account

Vance Says U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Break Down over Nuclear Issue

iPhone 18 Pro Leaked Designs

Bella: Hypergrah memory for AI agent(10x time horizon)

Online Phreak Box

The Local Universe's Expansion Rate Clearer Than Ever. But Still Doesn't Add Up

Why meaningful days look like nothing while you are living them

Show HN: Posse – Open-Source Web UI for Anthropic Managed Agents

Jury reaches no verdict on first day deliberating at Live Nation monopoly trial

Building a better crossword page for my daily cryptic hit – Whitebeard's Realm

How Ship Anchors Work [video]