frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: AI Square Face Avatar Generator and Classic Flash Pixel Icon Generator

https://www.squarefacegenerator.ai
1•hashkitly•22s ago•0 comments

Apps and programming: two accidental tyrannies

https://andymatuschak.org/tat/
1•sebg•22s ago•0 comments

Big O for MySQL: Why the Same Query Gets Slow at Scale

https://anotherboringtechblog.com/2026/04/big-o-for-mysql/
1•tanelpoder•1m ago•0 comments

Dear Codebase: A Letter from Your Coding Agent

https://mroczek.dev/articles/dear-codebase-letter-from-agent/
1•lackoftactics•1m ago•0 comments

White House accuses China of 'industrial scale' theft of AI technology

https://www.reuters.com/world/white-house-accuses-china-industrial-scale-theft-ai-technology-ft-r...
1•nickthegreek•3m ago•1 comments

Muon Experiment Eliminates Fifth Force, Confirms Standard Model

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/physicists-think-theyve-solved-the-muon-mystery/
1•dan-bailey•3m ago•0 comments

Name in Landsat

https://science.nasa.gov/specials/your-name-in-landsat/
1•luispa•3m ago•0 comments

Audio transcription is worse in 2026 than it was in 2016

https://write.as/shantnu/audio-transcription-is-worse-in-2026-than-it-was-in-2016
1•shantnutiwari•4m ago•0 comments

Making beautiful work is getting harder

https://slowlywilliam.com/2026/04/21/why-everything-is-terrible.html
2•quicklywilliam•5m ago•1 comments

AuraCode – An AI Agent tool to visualize and chat with messy codebases

https://www.auracode.space/
1•TaraW1•6m ago•0 comments

Dioxus – Fullstack app framework for web, desktop, and mobile in Rust

https://github.com/dioxuslabs/dioxus
1•modinfo•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: JSBT – binary serialization for real JavaScript object graphs

https://github.com/cheprasov/ts-jsbt
1•cheprasov•7m ago•0 comments

Bitwarden Statement on Checkmarx Supply Chain Incident

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/bitwarden-statement-on-checkmarx-supply-chain-incident/96127
1•Wingy•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Uvx skill-mgr install -t Claude -t codex

https://github.com/AI-Colleagues/skill-mgr
1•NeuralNotwork•7m ago•0 comments

macOS Desktop app v0.0.1 Preview Release "bot with a budget" idea

https://github.com/DialtoneApp/macos-app
1•fcpguru•7m ago•1 comments

IP Networking in Deep Space

https://blog.apnic.net/2026/04/16/podcast-ip-networking-in-deep-space/
1•wesleyeddy•7m ago•0 comments

To Protect and Swerve: NYPD Cop Has 547 Speeding Tickets

https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2026/04/23/to-protect-and-swerve-nypd-cop-has-527-speeding-tickets-ye...
2•greedo•8m ago•0 comments

Building with teams in two continents is hard. Here's what I learnt

https://thefoundersdraft.substack.com/p/everyone-tells-you-to-build-global
3•manishfp•9m ago•0 comments

Researchers Simulated a Delusional User to Test Chatbot Safety

https://www.404media.co/delusion-using-chatgpt-gemini-claude-grok-safety-ai-psychosis-study/
1•pkilgore•11m ago•0 comments

Decoupled DiLoCo: Resilient, Distributed AI Training at Scale

https://deepmind.google/blog/decoupled-diloco/
3•salkahfi•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LocalLLM – Recipes for Running the Local LLM (Need Contributors)

https://locallllm.fly.dev
2•Igor_Wiwi•16m ago•1 comments

A Comprehensive Guide to Model Routing for Coding Agents

https://www.notdiamond.ai/blog/a-comprehensive-guide-to-model-routing
1•t5-notdiamond•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: When Your Repo Moves, Your AI Coding History Doesn't

https://www.apicula.com/blog/when-your-repo-moves-your-ai-history-doesnt/
1•apiculallc•16m ago•0 comments

Aster Mail – End-to-end encrypted email with post-quantum cryptography

https://astermail.org/
1•lucasfin000•16m ago•1 comments

Oldest known recording of a whale song could unlock mysteries of the ocean

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/oldest-known-recording-of-a-whale-song-could-unlock-mysterie...
1•PaulHoule•16m ago•0 comments

Inflated AI claims are under fire–and the regulatory reckoning is coming

https://fortune.com/2026/04/23/ai-washing-securities-litigation-regulatory-era-baker-mckenzie/
2•Brajeshwar•18m ago•0 comments

User-side software, and adversarial marketplaces

https://faingezicht.com/articles/2026/04/22/adversarial-marketplaces/
1•speckx•19m ago•0 comments

GitHub CLI begins collecting client-side user telemetry

https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/22/github_opts_all_cli_users/
1•LaSombra•20m ago•1 comments

The end of oil? As fuel shocks cascade, 53 nations plan a fossil fuel phaseout

https://theconversation.com/the-end-of-oil-as-fuel-shocks-cascade-53-nations-gather-to-plan-a-fos...
1•smurda•20m ago•0 comments

GitHub Having Issues (Again)

https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/3f30ycplyr7l
3•connorbrinton•21m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

US Department of Justice has officially reclassified cannabis as less dangerous

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxd0xxp0jko
79•kaycebasques•1h ago

Comments

ezfe•1h ago
Only cannabis that is prescribed medically or in an FDA-approved product:

> Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Thursday changed the classifications of products containing marijuana that are covered by the Food and Drug Administration or that have received a state medical-marijuana licence. They will move from a Schedule I narcotic like heroin to a Schedule III drug - on par with Tylenol with codeine.

> He also called a hearing to consider reclassifying all marijuana.

mlinhares•1h ago
Still boggles my mind the previous administration had the power to do that and did nothing.
chneu•1h ago
Biden is/was extremely pro-cop. Cops love weed legislation because it's an easy way to stop citizens.

The prison system also loves weed legislation. So many folks are/were behind bars for weed.

dmix•1h ago
There has still been a major decline in federal prosecutions for marijuana in the US, something like -50% since 2020. The vast majority of weed prosecutions happen at the state level.

Biden also mass pardoned minor weed possession charges https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/biden-marijuana-simple-possess...

cucumber3732842•56m ago
State vs federal unfortunatly doesn't change the math behind the "if we do W then union X will not support us and then voting block Y will vote against us at a predicted rate of Z%" math upon which most of these political decisions are calculated.
dmix•53m ago
That is true. Plus DEA doesn't want to lose any power and they'll have the presidents ear.
pelotron•1h ago
Could have had so many easy W's and just didn't.
soupfordummies•38m ago
for real, I was kind of thinking they would pull an October Surprise out of the hat like "Surprise, weed is federally legal!"
panja•31m ago
I don't think this is a completely fair characterization:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_policy_of_the_Biden_a...

DoneWithAllThat•27m ago
Your link does nothing to address OP’s claim. Reclassifying marijuana requires only the stroke of the president’s pen. Biden chose not to do that.
lenerdenator•22m ago
Apparently not, or Trump would have done it earlier, too.

There were investigations into just what reclassification would mean for other regulations, laws and treaties. These were begun during the Biden administration and are now being finished. If you just say "weed's schedule III now", without any other modifications to policy, you'll have confusion over just what that means to a bunch of different federal, state, and local agencies.

Also, you don't want a President just doing things with the stroke of a pen. Actually, that's our biggest problem right now, letting an autocrat piss all over separation of powers as a treat.

malfist•22m ago
Biden didn't want to reclassify it because there's really no point in reclassifying. It's still illegal to possess for recreational use and requires a controlled substance prescription from a doctor.

It would take a law to remove it from the control substances scheduling, no president can do that. Which is also why Trump didn't do it. (It's now schedule 3 instead of schedule 1)

stonogo•21m ago
No, it requires more than a stroke of the pen, and the stroke of the pen that was required happened in 2024. It's been DEA foot-dragging ever since, which is what Trump's executive order last year addressed.
lenerdenator•26m ago
That's not true. Biden started this process, and it has continued into the Trump administration.
superxpro12•16m ago
They did. Biden did the "right" thing by starting a 4 years long re-certifying process. That's how "locked down" marijuana was... It was in the same class as heroin. You cant just "sign a piece of paper". (And its worth remembering hemp/marijuana has been locked down for literal centuries for silly reason. First because it was affecting the rope industry, and then later as a tool to suppress minorities and hippies and the counter-culture anti-vietnam movement in the 60's. Cant have black panthers running around with guns, But how can we criminalize them? Well... you make something they all do illegal.... like smoking weed. There's a reason the incarceration for weed-related offenses is VASTLY BLACK.

I mean... you can just EO this.... but there's rules you're SUPPOSED to follow. Biden did that.

This is simply Trump reaping the rewards of that effort without (of course) giving any acknowledgement to Biden.

Oh and BTW, why didn't Trump do this in his FIRST administration in 2016-2020?

Oh, and remind me which party consistently voted AGAINST rescheduling over the past 30 years?

The private prison industry is affected by this HARD. When you deregulate, all those marijuana criminals (who are mostly black btw) go away. Thats less heads in jail, which is less money to the private prison corporations. My guess is now that this current administration is sending immigrants and americans to immigrant concentration camps, their headcount will be a wash when the marijuana convictions fade away.

And guess which party the private prison industry donates to?

Ruling by executive order is fundamentally incompatible with democracy.

rkozik1989•1h ago
This is ultimately a good thing, but as a country we also need to talk about the effects of cannabis use on neurodivergent folks. Its not as harmful as other drugs but also isn't really a good coping mechanism. Especially if you're neurodivergent and deal with depression. What I've seen being in/out of partial hospitalization programs is that people just don't realize that heavy cannabis is actually causing/prolonging some of the problems they use cannabis to escape from.

Everyone needs to make their own health decisions for themselves but we really do need a mature conversation about cannabis.

nkohari•1h ago
This is absolutely true, but it's also difficult to square the legal restrictions around cannabis while alcohol is freely available (and significantly more dangerous and habit-forming), and nicotine use is on the rise again thanks to vapes and Zyn.

(To be clear, they're all drugs, and they should all be used responsibly if at all.)

dmix•1h ago
Anything that impacts sleep like habitual alcohol or weed use. Nothing more important than sleep quality for health.
chucksta•1h ago
Coffee?
kstrauser•11m ago
That’s the crux of it for me. I don’t use weed but I enjoy a small amount of alcoholic beverages, like a really good beer once a month or so. I can’t go along with any law that allows me to enjoy my intoxicant of choice but throws someone else in jail for enjoying their less dangerous one.
chneu•1h ago
Multiple large studies and metanalysis show very little support for the notion that marijuana treats most mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety. It's definitely not the "cure all" that a lot of folks think it is.
lern_too_spel•59m ago
In a significant fraction of users, there is a risk of marijuana induced psychoses. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...
thinkingtoilet•47m ago
I am hippy among hippies and the only people who ever talk about it as a 'cure all' are the people really far gone. People who think crystals can cure sicknesses. Those type of people. It's literally a god send to people with stomach problems, it can help you go to sleep but I would bet everything I own it's not as deep and good a sleep as sleeping sober. I've heard people say the ointments can help with certain pains. That's about it.
hn_throwaway_99•37m ago
You say it's just people who are "really far gone", but when I look at the type of marketing at CBD stores, it's marketed for nearly everything, so I suspect a lot more people are falling for this than you might suspect. Plus, any individual doesn't have to believe it's a "cure-all" - they just have to believe it cures their specific random ailment. I've seen it marketed to help with sleep, anxiety (despite it causing anxiety in a lot of people), depression, any type of pain you can think of, nausea, hoarders of chronic conditions, etc.

I agree with the top comment - I think it's great that we're starting to deal rationally with cannabis, but we need to be realistic about. It can be beneficial but can also cause real harms, especially in children and young adults, and cannabis use disorder is a real thing.

iinnPP•21m ago
I think there exists enough evidence of placebo benefits that it shouldn't be all that surprising. Moreover, regardless of any study or anecdote to the contrary, Those people will exist and see actual benefits, realized or not.
pier25•1h ago
As someone who abused cannabis in my 20s and had my fair share of issues I can only agree.
R_D_Olivaw•51m ago
I think a significant portion of this has to do with the absolute insane levels of THC that is being circulated these days. ~20% minimums of THC is bonkers
mekdoonggi•43m ago
I agree, though if the end result of this change is that people use cannabis at concerts and clubs instead of alcohol, I believe that's a harm reduction.
muyuu•40m ago
this is what gives me pause about this issue

it's easy to just look at the upside of something that doesn't hurt you and you just have an extra choice, but knowing that it can and does wreck the lives of many, I feel that it's a painful thing for me to vote for, or against

bombcar•37m ago
There's a general and larger question than just "weed for autists" that needs to be discussed - and it touches on large amounts of the population and "freedoms".

We've seen from the gambling legalization, drug legalization, and even things like loot boxes, etc, that there is a subset of the population who just cannot handle these things at a level most people would consider "responsible". We last had this nation-wide conversation around drinking, and prohibition had its problems, but we're going to have to support this group somehow, or let them be exploited by advanced companies as if they're subhuman.

lenerdenator•28m ago
Unfortunately, you'll never get it to where people aren't going to become addicts to these things. You can only reduce harms by regulation and social support.

Gambling is a decent example of where we've lost touch with this in the last decade. In my state, it used to be that if you wanted to play games of pure chance, you had to go to a physical casino, present an ID, and be subject to the rules and regulations of the state which were enforced by actual state LEOs who were always on-premises. If you wanted to, you could sign an affidavit that would ban you from the casino floor on the risk of a misdemeanor trespassing charge.

Now, you can open an app on your phone and place sports bets. There's no harm reduction at all. The apps are designed to be as addictive as possible, minors can sign in under their adult guardians' accounts, and there's no way to ban yourself from the apps. It's destroying people's finances from a very young age.

That's what happens when you don't regulate on the rationale that regulations keep line from going up.

Throaway199999•25m ago
Yes, previous regulation was built on the principle that we actually did understand the risks, as rational adults, and so we would have reasonable protections but in for people around those.

Today's regulation seems to be dependent on the principle of not talking about risks at all.

superxpro12•19m ago
Today's regulations are solely "deregulation". Corporations are racing to maximize exploitation before the deregulation snaps back to reality.
giantg2•10m ago
"If you wanted to, you could sign an affidavit that would ban you from the casino floor on the risk of a misdemeanor trespassing charge."

Let's help people by criminalizing them so they have a harder time getting a job and all that...

CodingJeebus•16m ago
12 Step recovery and adjacent programs fill this niche quite well, and new communities are popping up all the time to deal with more modern addictions, like internet/technology addiction.

I'm sober and have been in that world for several years now, and the most important (and hardest) part of getting sober was accepting that I had a problem and needed help. Macro policy decisions can help with access to an extent, but addicts fundamentally cannot make better decisions for themselves until they first realize they have a problem. And as prohibition taught us, once the demand is there, it can't just be regulated away.

tombert•34m ago
I've never actually touched weed, but I would see this with my friends in high school and college.

In the better case, they just become insufferable and pseudo-intellectual because they started watching Alan Watts and Carl Sagan while stoned and would become convinced that they know everything about physics and philosophy.

In a lot of cases though, and this is more obvious in hindsight, it feels like they were using weed as a means of dealing with the fact that they were deeply unhappy and depressed people. Instead of confronting their problems and seeing a therapist/psychiatrist or any of the other things that they could do to actively improve their life, they would spend their evenings and weekends getting high.

I don't inherently have an issue with people using recreational drugs; I've gotten drunk before [1], but it should be done in moderation.

[1] I never did it that much and I haven't had anything to drink at all in years.

iinnPP•14m ago
On the opposite end of that is the plethora of psychiatry/psychology professionals whom are terrible at their profession and are likely causing more harm than good.

I see it along the same lines as brands, your typical Great Value psychologist will greatly underperform the Kirkland psychologist who will greatly underperform the ... and so on.

Then there's the subset of the population whom have been abused in the most horrific ways by psychologists.

Not to counter your point, just as additional discussion.

david38•30m ago
You don’t have to be neurodivergent. Weed is bad. Not going to jail is one thing, actively pushing it is another
GordonS•15m ago
Just one data point, but I'm neurodivergent, and suffered with depression from childhood.

A few years ago I was prescribed medical cannabis to treat chronic pain, and aside from being great for pain - wow, it's changed my life!

The right cannabis strains can do wonders for my mood, but it also makes me feel... less autistic, for want of a better way of putting it; suddenly I can understand why somebody said something, or how something I said could be taken the wrong way. For the first time in my life, I can really try to see things from someone else's perspective, and I'm thinking about other people far more than I ever have - I feel empathic.

Over time, cannabis has also allowed me to analyse and think on the past, which, has greatly helped me. For the first time in my life, I would no longer describe myself as having depression (it may come back if I stopped cannabis treatment, so maybe I should say I'm in remission).

Cannabis use may of course pose some risks for a small percentage of the population, but I'd wager it's in general far less dangerous than alcohol. And of course, my experience will not be universal.

Aloha•9m ago
Benzos do the same thing for me, they slow the brain enough so you’re not overthinking everything.
oompydoompy74•1h ago
Regulating human consumption of anything that grows from the ground is absolutely ridiculous. It’s an affront to the natural order. At the minimum, nobody should have the ability to tell me I can’t buy seeds and grow a plant for my own personal consumption.
muyuu•38m ago
what is the logic behind that anything that can be homegrown should be legal? it makes enforcement harder, but it doesn't make any potential damages any better or worse
jdrormdj•32m ago
Human consumption of potatos is also strongly regulated. You can not just grow and eat potatoes, without paying taxes!
Throaway199999•26m ago
Is there a potato-eating-tax I didn't know about? I better call my accountant...
jdrormdj•25m ago
It produces CO2. We cull millions of cows for this reason!
Throaway199999•24m ago
Because they eat potatoes?
kube-system•23m ago
No, they are loosely regulated.
stronglikedan•18m ago
> Regulating human consumption of anything that grows from the ground is absolutely ridiculous.

As always, it depends. While I agree wrt marijuana, everyone would be an opiate addict if poppy wasn't regulated - it's just that good.

something765478•15m ago
> At the minimum, nobody should have the ability to tell me I can’t buy seeds and grow a plant for my own personal consumption.

There should be some exceptions, like banning invasive species, but in general, you're absolutely right.

bakies•45m ago
Now the next Democrat presidential candidate can't run on "legalize it." Might have to develop real strategy.
stonogo•23m ago
Which prospective candidates were you expecting to run on "legalize it"?
recursivegirth•14m ago
If the Democrats run on legalization they have already lost. Quite no one literally gives a shit about this besides the marginalized people it's going to affect negatively the most.

Can we move on to more important and substantive topics? Something something files.

lenerdenator•35m ago
"Trump administration finishes Biden administration effort to reclassify cannabis as less dangerous" would be a more accurate headline.
setgree•29m ago
Every so often the Trump administration seems like they might actually care about getting my vote. A recent executive order making it easier to do research on psychedelic therapy is another example [0]. A policy shift to reform IRB review for social and behavioral science [1] would be really targeted at me.

I know politics is hard to talk about, but I generally think that we underappreciate the importance of being agentic in politics. Obviously I prefer that our government follow the law and uphold the constitution. But the many ways in which the current administration got things done by being quick, by "flooding the zone" [2], and by using tactics that apparently no one noticed before [3-4] are worthy of study and emulation.

I know the obvious response to this is to note that a lot of what they're doing is illegal, and again, I think that's bad. But they really make the current Democratic leadership seem out of touch and old [5] by comparison. Combined with policy positions that are far from the median voter's [6], it doesn't make for a winning look/platform.

[0] https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/04/acce...

[1] https://www.cspicenter.com/p/its-time-to-review-the-institut...

[2] https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2025/02/tr...

[3] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/10/27/russell-vought...

[4] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/03/16/the-unmaking-o...

[5] https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-democrat...

[6] https://www.slowboring.com/p/the-median-voter-is-a-50-someth...

Throaway199999•28m ago
I agree as a political science grad. In hindsight, the only surprising thing about Trump's rise to power was that WE were surprised. Trump was doing the #1 thing politicians are supposed to do; tell the people what they want to hear. Our establishment is just so out-of-touch with reality and in love with the status quo that they can't change.
rurp•9m ago
While I agree that Dems have a long history of being dithering and feckless, and I like the cannabis and psychedelic changes, those wins just seem so incredibly small compared to the insane amount of corruption, incompetence, and maliciousness from this administration.

The spiteful killing of so much research funding alone dwarfs all of their minor wins. Wrecking clean energy projects are total self sabotage for the country. The utter lack of pollution enforcement will cause untold cases of cancer and other disease in Americans. Trump's family has stolen billions for themselves while destroying hundreds of billions of dollars in value with this idiotic Iran war they can't even articulate a plan or theory of victory for.

This is far from an exhaustive list. Trump is good at making minor high profile moves seem like a big deal, but it can really distract from the orders of magnitude worse decisions he's making elsewhere.

periodjet•19m ago
Is it less dangerous though? I was a heavy user for a year and it thoroughly destabilized my life and really negatively impacted my mental health. The funny thing is recalling how much of a cannabis advocate I was at the time, too.
hx8•7m ago
Cannabis did not belong in Schedule 1. Yes Cannabis use comes with risk, but compare it to Fentanyl which is Schedule 2.