I don't see why it would. Thunderbolt is not a USB standard
15155•13m ago
Good sheet. Worth adding:
- Female vs male crossover naming and pinouts for Type-C connectors
- Actual voltage, modulation and signaling schemes (USB4v2 uses PAM3 11b/7t encoding)
- PD generations and profiles
mschuster91•10m ago
... and the bunch of proprietary voltage schemes like Quickcharge.
Neywiny•8m ago
I actually like the 3.2 naming. Gen is speed, "by" is width. It puts it very roughly on par with PCIe's naming which nobody complains about. I just don't like that USB 3, USB 3.1, and USB 3.2 are the same things. And that sales people don't seem to understand that saying a chip supports 3.1 or 3.2 tells me it's anywhere from 5-20gbps which isn't ideal.
brcmthrowaway•16m ago
Neywiny•7m ago