Over the last year I mostly used Codex, but during the last month I tried Claude Code with Opus 4.6 and 4.7. These are my notes.

This is not a benchmark. It is just my experience from daily use on one production codebase. For some medium-complexity tasks, I also ran both tools with the same prompts, but I did not try to make this a controlled evaluation.

TL;DR: for my production Python monolith, I still prefer Codex.

The codebase is a many-years-old Python backend. It has several architectural layers from different periods: a newer experimental DDD-ish style, older but still well-structured legacy code, and very old fragile spaghetti code.

We usually do not rewrite old parts unless we have to. The preferred strategy is to leave them alone until they are naturally replaced or removed. This is not a simple CRUD web server. It is a complex, sometimes overcomplicated, application with many A/B tests and very specific business logic in many corners.

Why I prefer Codex for this codebase:

1. Codex follows harness-engineering principles much better for me. See: https://openai.com/index/harness-engineering/ Claude does not reliably follow this workflow unless my AGENTS.md contains very explicit short instructions, such as: “Read exec_plan.md and follow it.”

2. Claude more often creates new tools instead of first searching the codebase for existing ones. In this kind of codebase, reusing existing project-specific tools and patterns matters a lot.

3. Claude more often reads too little code or documentation before choosing where to put new functionality. I frequently had to go through several correction rounds in the same task: “Put this functionality in module A instead, not in the controller. That is the right place.” “Do not construct the response object using the statuses you sent in the request. The API already returns the updated object — use that response, include it in the result, and validate that its state matches what we expect.” “No, validate it in the same module that owns this boundary.” This kind of back-and-forth became tiring. Codex seems to have a better planning mode for this type of work. It more often notices missing context in my prompt and asks clarifying questions before making architectural changes.

4. I migrated through several Codex/GPT model versions during this period because new versions were released while I was testing. I have not tested GPT-5.5 on UI-heavy work yet. However, Opus 4.6 was much better for frontend work than Codex 5.3 and GPT-5.4 in my experience. For UI tasks, I currently prefer Claude.

Skills and MCP: I use only one shared skill for both LLMs: commands to start and stop the Docker Compose environment and run tests inside it.

How to distribute skills to your engineers

Predictive pursuit emerges in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks

Beijing Auto Show: more EV models in each of 17 halls than in the US

Rusternetes : A ground-up reimplementation of Kubernetes in Rust

Our first paying user found us from China in 4 days – zero marketing

Ask HN: Should it be acceptable that Excel needs to update 2-3 times/month?

Big AI Cluster Little Power the 8x Nvidia GB10 Cluster – ServeTheHome

Stevens Online World of Blade Runner (2001)

The players who lost big money on Peter Molyneux's failed Legacy

Curiosity Rover Finds New Organic Molecules on Mars

Tooling Up Hermes Agent

openclaw ggsql

Carrot Disclosure

From Convergence to Confidence: Push-Button Verification for RDTs

Show HN: Agents in Whisper Memos

Space meteor showers visualization powered by SpaceKit.js

Despite everything, a small praise of GitHub

Paper Age

Workers Training Meta's AI Could Be Laid Off

The Site for Prevention of Laptop Sales

The Downfall and Enshittification of Microsoft in 2026

Britain's Solar Revolution Is Here; We Should Be Shouting It from the Rooftops

Show HN: C# based Kubernetes Operator to deploy SurrealDB

Wire to Replace Signal as Standard in the Bundestag

Why Codex works better than Claude Code for my production monolith

ListingBot – One click, 100 directories, zero hassle

Meta found in breach of EU law for failing to keep children off platforms

RSME: A Reactive Stability Mutation Encryption

Study Finds a Third of New Websites Are AI-Generated

Who's on call? How Opus 4.6 helped us calculate this 2,500x faster

What's next for voice dictation apps