frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: How do you defend against supply chain attacks today?

1•elric•37s ago•0 comments

Karakeep – self-hostable bookmark-everything app

https://github.com/karakeep-app/karakeep
1•ano-ther•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Diffmode – Tool that builds custom growth tactics for bootstrapped SaaS

https://diffmode.app/
1•vanyaland•2m ago•0 comments

Neanderthal Dentists

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0347662
1•johnp314•3m ago•0 comments

Blocking mobile internet on smartphones improves attention and mental health

https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/4/2/pgaf017/8016017?login=false
1•jabo•5m ago•0 comments

Microsoft's AI system tops Anthropic's Mythos on cybersecurity benchmark

https://www.geekwire.com/2026/microsofts-multi-agent-ai-system-tops-anthropics-mythos-on-cybersec...
1•kseniamorph•5m ago•0 comments

Beware of Drunk Deer, French Police Say, Announcing Season of Inebriation

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/13/world/europe/france-drunk-deer.html
1•bookofjoe•6m ago•1 comments

Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2525037-why-autism-pioneer-uta-frith-wants-to-dismantle-the-...
1•donsupreme•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: FreeFax (iOS) – a data point on shipping solo with Claude

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/freefax-send-fax-from-phone/id6763340737
1•joelsfoster•7m ago•0 comments

Hush – local push-to-talk dictation for macOS, no cloud, pastes at cursor

https://github.com/djmunro/hush
1•djmunro•7m ago•0 comments

DiscordMcp: Controlling Servers Through MCP

https://blog.rastrian.dev/post/discordmcp-controlling-servers-through-mcp
1•SchwKatze•8m ago•0 comments

The Whole Anthropic Kerfuffle

https://twitter.com/josevalim/status/2054887621336174799
2•tosh•8m ago•0 comments

Fight Slop with Clarity

https://blog.vtemian.com/post/fight-slop-with-clarity/
1•vtemian•10m ago•0 comments

Release NetHack 5.0 Atari ST/TT/Falcon (WIP)

https://github.com/ingpaschke/NetHack/releases/tag/v5.0-atari-wip
1•ibobev•11m ago•0 comments

Ubuntu 26.04 LTS Moving the Industry Forward with Linux 7.0 and More

https://www.servethehome.com/ubuntu-26-04-lts-moving-the-industry-forward-with-linux-7-0-and-more/
1•PaulHoule•13m ago•0 comments

BrrrViz – Learn GPU Programming

https://brrrviz.com/
2•sebg•14m ago•0 comments

Claude Account Suspended Seconds After Purchase?

2•AnthropicWHAT•14m ago•0 comments

The Third Hard Problem

https://mmapped.blog/posts/48-the-third-hard-problem
2•surprisetalk•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: The trading terminal that prices everything in gold

https://pricedingoldelite.com
1•rrwilla•16m ago•0 comments

eBay Price Guesser

https://www.eguessr.com/
1•structuredPizza•17m ago•0 comments

56% merge rate on 316 cold OSS PRs in a week

https://github.com/kimjune01
2•kimjune01•19m ago•1 comments

Computer Hobby Movement in Canada

https://museum.eecs.yorku.ca/exhibits/show/hobby_canada/hobby_canada
2•rbanffy•19m ago•0 comments

Installing Linux on a Dead Badger: User's Notes by Lucy A. Snyder

https://strangehorizons.com/wordpress/non-fiction/articles/installing-linux-on-a-dead-badger-user...
1•speckx•19m ago•0 comments

Building for the Joy of Building

https://jola.dev/posts/building-for-the-joy-of-building
1•shintoist•20m ago•0 comments

Biggest Questions in Biotech

https://shelbyann.substack.com/p/biggest-questions-in-biotech
2•sebg•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AIMX – Self-hosted, open-source email server designed for AI agents

https://aimx.email/
3•uzyn•21m ago•1 comments

Green Hills Integrity RTOS: IPCOMShell Telnet Format String (CVE-2019-7711)

https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2026050002
1•mbanyamer•22m ago•1 comments

A Technical Deep Dive into the New Raycast

https://www.raycast.com/blog/a-technical-deep-dive-into-the-new-raycast
1•iscmt•25m ago•0 comments

Side hustle tax calculator (UK)

https://sidehustletaxcalculator.uk/
1•boros2me•26m ago•0 comments

Requirements analysis: catching requirement bugs before they become code

https://kiro.dev/blog/deep-spec-analysis/
1•sebg•27m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

The Dating App Swipe Is Dying. What Comes Next May Be Worse

https://www.insidehook.com/sex-and-dating/bumble-dating-app-swipe-dying
11•RickJWagner•1h ago

Comments

panny•1h ago
Dating apps don't have incentive to match you up. When they do, they lose a customer.
throw310822•55m ago
Breeze has a really cool formula in which you pay exclusively for each date. And a date is organised automatically for each match, without any possibility to chat beforehand.
Yoric•51m ago
Unless I'm missing something, this sounds awful.
Schiendelman•50m ago
When was the last time you went on a date with someone new? I ask because it's likely less awful than the current state.
throw310822•32m ago
Why does it? I'm curious. I think it solves most of the issues of the traditional apps. (But yes, I didn't mention a fundamental aspect: they propose you only a very limited amount of profiles each day, no endless swiping: if you don't fancy any of your daily ~4, tough luck, you can come back tomorrow).
harimau777•41m ago
How do you verify that they are who the profile says they are without chatting beforehand?
throw310822•32m ago
You don't. You go to the date (in a public place, set by the app) and if there's something fishy about them you can report them to the app (there's an explicit feedback request after each date).
harimau777•27m ago
If you have to pay per match, then aren't you already out the money at that point? Not to mention the risk of just getting murdered.
throw310822•22m ago
Ooh, you lost $12! And your date did too, and probably the account as well. As for the risk of getting murdered, I think it's unavoidable in any app (and in life in general) but probably worse if you organise the date by yourself.
aurareturn•26m ago
You still have to match first. So the same swipe left or right but once you match, there is a system that asks when you're free for a date. That's it.
throw310822•19m ago
Not exactly, you only have a very limited amount of profiles visible every day. About 4, though maybe it depends on the location. So there is no endless swiping. You also cannot match anyone else until you have set up a date with your last match, and if you opt out too many times (again, probably three or four) your account gets blocked.

In any case, you only pay for dates you go to (unless you cancel at the last moment). Their incentive is to send you to as many dates as possible.

aurareturn•8m ago
Coffee Meets Bagels tried that. A few matches at 12PM every day.

I think the key problem for dating apps is that 90% of women on it will only match with the top 10% of men. Meanwhile, most men will try to match with anything that has a nose and eyes.

I don't think Breeze's concept fixes that since it's still up to the girl to match.

jerojero•52m ago
Its a little bit of a balance act, they want to match you with someone that's good enough to date a couple times but not enough to date long term.

I think the mathematics work better if they match you with "mostly compatible" people rather than "not compatible at all". Success stories are important because that's how you build recognition.

Now a days though, match group owns all dating apps so they have a monopoly in dating. Whenever a new app comes to market that's "better" (which will be, in its initial stages) they acquire. Users migrate and then they ruin. Rinse and repeat.

They recently acquired sniffies (a gay cruising app) for like 100M. Go figure.

panny•47m ago
I've looked into match group before, they're the usual suspects (Blackrock, Vanguard) and practice lawfare. If you don't take their buyout (like how bumble refused) then they try to sue you with software patents which I thought were all basically invalidated in Alice v. CLS Bank. But yeah, they're not a nice group of people who want to match you up. They're in it for money. And the way match group operates makes others reluctant to enter the market, unless they are just looking for a big buyout payday.
bitmasher9•51m ago
I actually think a Facebook or Instagram might be in the best position to offer dating with the goal of permanent matching.

* Recruit friends to make recommendations mimics classic searching techniques

* Can scope out a more complete bio early in the process, for both AI and Human filtering/matching

* Their long term incentives will be meet if they post cute couple pictures or generate new long term users

aurareturn•28m ago
LinkedIn is. But they won't do it.
deltoidmaximus•24m ago
Facebook apparently already has a dating app. I've heard anecdotally it is much better than the match group apps, maybe for older age ranges? I'm married and haven't used dating sites in over 20 years.

In theory the 'knows people you know' thing is a good vetting system for finding people to date though.

lifis•28m ago
That is only the case if people enter exclusive relationships. But if someone has access to a dating app or system that works really well, there is little reason to do that.
armchairhacker•59m ago
> Bumble says it will ditch swiping features in favor of AI-powered matchmaking

This should be the title

drcongo•19m ago
Indeed, I initially thought this was about a dating app called Swipe.
efilife•2m ago
There would be no confusion if every word wasn't capitalized
smitty1e•43m ago
When y'all get tired of this faffing about: pursue a suitable community of faith; date an actual person of the opposite gender until Destiny (and other wise eyes) indicate a match; marry, and let two be a large value of one; have or adopt some children; enjoy the fullness of life in all its seasons.

The old formula has endured and shan't be supplanted by these fancy gizmos.

harimau777•40m ago
The problem is that doesn't actually work. I've spent my entire life active in communities of faith and that certainly has never involved, helped with, or facilitated a date let alone a long term relationship.
hattmall•23m ago
I find that so incredibly hard to believe, in my experience it's like the primary purpose of people in relationships past a certain age is to play matchmaker.

It seems inevitable if you are consistently around people and known to be single that they will try to set you up with *someone.

sublinear•39m ago
I find it interesting that this niche manages to survive, and that the most common takes are attacks on the gimmicks rather than the quality of the people signing up.

The last time any dating apps were "good" was when they weren't apps, but websites. People on these sites back then weren't really trying to optimize for anything. Many were honest and had realistic expectations. It was considered a bit loserish because it's the digital version of the want ads. Of course, everyone likes piña coladas.

Dating websites were the less exhausting alternative to going out drinking or finding new social circles. People understood that low risk meant low reward, but hey it was either that or no date at all.

In other words, this was always a pretty bad scene. What changed is the marketing angle more poised to take advantage of the naive. Making it shiny because computers isn't really working anymore. It's crazy it ever did.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm•14m ago
On dating apps, men will always be the customer and women are the product. You cannot fix this asymmetry due to how attraction works and the risks involved between men and women. Ironically Instagram is 'the' dating app as you can vet people better and see if they have any social proof. Real life skips a lot of the BS altogether.

I can't ever see anything improving. They will just learn how to manipulate men further into paying, where you suddenly get swarmed with likes then get nothing for a period then get swarmed again so you remain hooked and eventually pay.

recursivedoubts•10m ago
as surely as water will wet us

as surely as fire will burn

the gods of the copybook headings

with terror and slaughter return

nathanaldensr•7m ago
This does absolutely nothing to address the underlying social, economic, and ideological reasons why new relationship formation is struggling so much, especially with Gen Z. It's not a technological problem, in other words.

I won't go into my personal explanations here as I'll just be downvoted into oblivion (there are other forums for that discussion) but I will say this: without men and women having reasons to be in relationships--especially long-term reasons--then relationships won't happen. It's proving easier to get our needs met outside of relationships.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm•3m ago
>I won't go into my personal explanations here as I'll just be downvoted into oblivion

Enlighten us.