You mean a programming job? Or all jobs?

People working as house painters, plumbers, farmers, chefs, engineers, architects, cops, soldiers, nurses and doctors aren't going to be irrelevant in 3 years, let alone 30. I think you're projecting your experience on the rest of the world, most of whom will be unaffected by LLMs in the short-term future.

There will be plumber robots though. They will break pipes and flood houses for a few iterations. Move fast and break the pipes. That might be a fun poll, how many here would allow a first generation plumber robot in their home and what might you hide from its view?

[Edit] Added a poll [2]

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VucjurQUHO8 [video][6 mins][language]

[2] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302523

For example, one part of a job is the satisfaction, the purpose, the meaning of life derived from being useful. Not having that can be pretty bad for people. So, even if the machines take over a lot of what is done by people today, you'll probably want to find a way of being useful.

Hedonism and wealth are both remarkably bad at delivering the same contentment that being useful does. That said, of course, a bit of hedonism and capital is also good.

> If you disagree with this premise, please provide actual evidence

That's not the way that works. You're the one making the positive claim, it's on you to provide evidence to support your claim.