Why would they not have a human look at the hit? Flock, San Diego and the SDPD are all liable.
It seems like if the police actually looked at the Flock data it would have exonerated them?
https://innocenceproject.org/news/how-curb-your-enthusiasm-s...
I'd like to think motive and a police sketch wouldn't be enough evidence for a conviction, but that's optimistic.
So can you really blame the courtroom being handed this (eventually wrongful) license plate data.
Red is a very popular color for the Giulia and window tint is not an uncommon item.
Any random person on the street could be described as able to be “caught without enough evidence to convict”
Not the same video, but best I could find: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_zmZLJY5Ev4
It would take a lot longer than that.
The article specifically says:
> just 23 seconds after San Police Officers in Golden Hill tried stopping the suspected carjacker
> Their tort claim notes that the path the men took to the cigar lounge passed by several other Flock cameras, which could have corroborated their story, as well as the location data on their cell phones.
Your argument is that, what, this guy you argue has no money also hacked the phone company to fake their records while driving at 100 mph through San Diego under an invisibility cloak so no other cameras or people saw anything?
variety8675•52m ago
SoftTalker•50m ago
garyfirestorm•32m ago
bhickey•27m ago
Tack on a reckless driving charge and a speeding ticket.
Wingy•18m ago
wombatpm•21m ago
OutOfHere•31m ago
pixl97•17m ago
OutOfHere•16m ago
Flock should be held accountable for ensuring adequate protections exist to prevent misuse.
pksebben•9m ago
Couple that with overburdening them with petty nonsense all the time and training them in military equipment and tactics and like it doesn't matter what tools you give them, those tools will be abused at convenience.
The issue is structural, not technical, but power tools = more damage per capita.
OutOfHere•3m ago
aaomidi•17m ago
turtlesdown11•13m ago
dlcarrier•6m ago