My belief is it is likely 1% or more. And likely coming in as an avalanche.
One of the moments that stood out to me was when Robert Youngjohns (the exec) asked Tom what it would take to have GitHub move to Azure. I was surprised that Tom had a response ready, saying that IOPS were really important and that virtual disks weren’t fast enough.
Heathen lies!
Oh, wait… we have to use it? Oh, that’s terrible…
csbrooks•1h ago
So AI means 14x the checkins? That's not 14x features completed, but still... wow.
nomel•57m ago
larusso•17m ago
We had it internally with our teams that open a PR to then push like 10-20 more commits but never actually interested in the client builds etc. turned out they opened the PR as a checkmark/ way to share the current state. We set cooldowns and auto cancel for the ci. And then there is the developer who uses the CI compute to run tests instead of running them locally for various reasons. We had to remind that compute isn’t for free.
nomel•11m ago
N_Lens•50m ago
shimman•28m ago
californical•16m ago
BobbyTables2•45m ago
Spread over a year, roughly estimating a generous 4 kbytes of data per commit, comes out to a throughput of a little under 2 MB/s.
Of course, it isn’t spread out uniformly and there is also a lot of hashing and other things going on.
Maybe pulls and clones drive more I/O ?
3eb7988a1663•39m ago
That's also just assuming the good-faith usage. There are probably plenty of adversarial and poorly behaved scrapers that are putting additional load on the system.
3eb7988a1663•42m ago
While that is (hopefully) the upper end of the distribution, several companies have loudly encouraged engineers to light tokens on fire to the AI gods, so it only takes a handful of the devout to push up the average in gas town like ventures.
Aperocky•6m ago