Google Chrome's Next Update Will Mark the End of Popular Ad Blockers

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/06/15/205219/google-chromes-next-update-will-mark-the-end-of-popular-ad-blockers

103•arnejenssen•1h ago

Comments

polairscience•1h ago

And I won't even notice. Firefox is probably the most divisive topic on this website. Mozilla gets ripped to shreds any time they're discussed, but they keep the open internet alive. I don't see how any self-respecting Hacker could choose anything else. I'm a big fan of critique, critiquing the scaffolding of our lives is the best thing we can do. That said...... we have nearly lost the browser wars and if we do it we will be worse for it.

metalliqaz•1h ago

Hear, hear!

Mozilla seems to have a string of bad leadership but when compared to Alphabet, I don't see how there can be any choice. Use Firefox or one of the niche privacy focused forks.

My uBlock Origin works perfectly well.

basch•56m ago

white hat firefox, black hat brave?

vovavili•51m ago

>I don't see how any self-respecting Hacker could choose anything else

Brave and Vivaldi strike me as being at least not worse.

throwaway27448•43m ago

I thought that brave was caught injecting affiliate links. That alone makes it worse than anything mozilla has done.

Edit: https://old.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/1ebbeas/why_...

netdevphoenix•38m ago

Those 2 browsers used a rendering engine developed by Google. It would not be wrong to consider them partial chromium reskins with all the technical dependency it entails.

jdiff•15m ago

They're built on Chromium, they still reinforce the Chromium monoculture and expand Google's influence.

gdulli•46m ago

And there's LibreWolf, for people who want to use Firefox without Mozilla.

worldsavior•46m ago

A self respecting hacker should also note firefox security is very bad.

netdevphoenix•38m ago

How so?

capitainenemo•28m ago

Yeah. Take Firefox choosing to create PDF.js to have a clean minimalist sandboxed PDF parser. Chrome instead used an existing one that has been the source of dozens of vulnerabilities.

Or Firefox pulling in a ton of anti-fingerprinting measures from the Tor team. Not even worth talking about anti-fingerprinting as a serious consideration in Chrome.

Rust - a mozilla effort that resulted in code from servo being pulled into Firefox - chrome is headed that way too.

Even WASM was definitely a security improvement over NaCL, and Mozilla also led the way on Flash replacements in the day, making one of the first JS flash players (in the end, the solution was no more flash, but hey, at least they tried).

Font sanitisation - originally a mozilla security effort...

I feel I could go on and on.

maxloh•23m ago

Did you know that Mozilla spends so much of their budget on their CEO's compensation that they actually had to lay off the entire Servo team?

capitainenemo•20m ago

Cite? I think the timeline has issues there. That predates the CEO controversies AFAIK. They did ditch a lot of R&D as their userbase kept shrinking due to chrome growth. 'course this sort of thing keeps coming up - yeah, I do think their CEO is overpaid ... and? Solution is what. Kill firefox off completely, hand internet over to chrome? Basically, where is this point going?

gorgonian•42m ago

I prefer ungoogled-chromium: https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium

nicce•37m ago

How does it helps with this issue? It becomes a much bigger fork if they keep the manifest support.

tapoxi•37m ago

Firefox already lost the browser wars. It's about 2%. Saying "you can use uBlock Origin instead of uBlock Origin Lite!" won't change this.

OkayPhysicist•28m ago

As long as Firefox keeps up with the standards treadmill, I could be the only person using it, and it really wouldn't affect me any. As of right now, there are vanishingly few sites that earnestly work differently on Firefox than on Chrome. Significantly more sites arbitrarily block non-Chrome User Agents, but that's trivially avoided by just serving a Chrome UA on Firefox.

Which makes it trivial to switch. There's really no justification for sticking with Chrome. Switching to Firefox takes about a minute, you can import all your saved logins and bookmarks, and then maybe spend a whole whopping 30 seconds adding Ublock Origin. Complaints about Chrome amount to "I am too inconceivably lazy to spend 90s switching to a browser that doesn't hate me".

barnabee•6m ago

Agree.

I only keep a Chromium based browser around because of Mozilla's asinine decision not to support Web Bluetooth and Web USB that are needed to interact with devices, microcontrollers, etc.

glenstein•22m ago

I think there was a huge missed opportunity with the recent Google monopoly case, which could have been used to give users a dialog box to select a browser from a list instead of starting with Chrome as the pre-installed default.

It's less drastic than forcing Chrome to be spun off, which I don't think was realistic, and it's almost an exact copy of an anti monopoly remedy used against both Microsoft and Apple. It likely would have a meaningful impact on browser market share and it would be very similar in spirit in terms of its impact to the proposed remedy of spinning off Chromium to a new company.

It would also be a convenient natural experiment testing the anti-Mozilla narrative that contends the browser market share decline had absolutely nothing to do with distribution defaults, but was instead exclusively driven by minutia of Mozilla's strategic decisions.

Noaidi•33m ago

I prefer an ad (and porn, gambling, social media) blocking host file myself.

WesolyKubeczek•30m ago

Necessary, but not sufficient. Sometimes you want to block certain URLs and not whole domains.

frizlab•29m ago

I use Safari, and it’s good.

MrDrMcCoy•26m ago

And useless if you don't have or want a Mac.

gf263•19m ago

Software you can’t run on your machine is useless? Okay.

maxloh•29m ago

Because Mozilla allocates far too much of their budget to executive compensation, which has led to the layoff of many Firefox maintainers, including the entire Servo team.

A self-respecting hacker would choose a piece of tech that is well-maintained, not one that only recently added profile support after all these years, or one that still offers an ancient bookmark and history UI.

glenstein•16m ago

This is confidently repeated but extremely misleading claim that seems to pop up ad nauseam in the comment sections. They spend more now on development than they ever have in their history, and the CEO spending is something like 1.6% of the budget, which I don't love, but which is not enough to sustain the narrative of all the money being siphoned into executives.

They also break down spending into a pie chart of different types and development gets more than anything. If you look at their actual budget or the published changes to new releases it tells a different story than vibes based internet comment sections. But you have be approaching conversations in an open-to-new-information kind of way.

hyperbovine•10m ago

1.6% is insane though. That would be like Google, Apple, or MSFT paying their CEO $4-6 billion a year.

water-data-dude•28m ago

I'm a big fan of WaterFox! I switched when Firefox decided to add a ton of AI crap without providing a "turn this crap off" button (you could force it, but I don't want to fight my tools). Really good experience, been recommending it to all my friends.

Librewolf is also good, and I use that on one of my other machines. I like Waterfox a bit more, but that's probably just personal taste. Both are solid and both cut the mold off the tasty cheese that is Firefox

lom888•23m ago

I've been using Waterfox on deskop for years and adore it. Firefox for mobile does great. I don't grasp how anyone uses Chrome as their daily driver willingly aside from just inertia.

daveshistory•17m ago

Most computer users have very few real demands to make and it suffices.

Daviey•1h ago

Can we update the title, should be, "Google Chrome's next update will mark the end of me using it"

majorchord•1h ago

I'm surprised you were using a proprietary browser in the first place

ThrowawayTestr•1h ago

On Chrome* Firefox is just fine.

righthand•1h ago

I’m going home for a visit. Will make sure to switch the family over to Firefox and explain why. Just as all us nerds did back when Chrome came out and we switched our family to that.

post-it•59m ago

> Just as all us nerds did back when Chrome came out and we switched our family to that.

This is one of my earliest tech memories. It was so fast when it came out.

haritha-j•1h ago

i keep hoping google will stop giving me reasons to switch ,because i can't be bothered to move all my passwords and stuff over, but every year they keep making it harder.

Likewise, I desperately want to stay on windows because of anticheat, but every year they keep making it harder.

vablings•1h ago

Make the switch now! Gaming on Linux is really only getting better every year with much hard work from valve.

Outside of developers opting out pretty much every single game works out of the box. I value my limited leisure time and to be able to just jump on my computer and start playing without any annoying nags about windows updates or restart this and strange unexplainable issues.

Move all of your passwords and logins too!

cholantesh•55m ago

Someone in the Thief community was celebrating the Nightdive remaster announcement because it is apparently getting much harder with each passing year to install and run the Dark Engine games on Windows; meanwhile I've been doing this multiple times a year for about a decade with Lutris.

romanovcode•46m ago

Those passwords are not yours unless you did the work and enabled on-device encryption which is disabled by default.

OkayPhysicist•25m ago

There's an automatic import tool. It takes 30s. Settings -> Import Browser Data. Select Chrome. It even prompts you during installation, in case you don't want to scan through the settings page.

sunaookami•1h ago

dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555244

More discussion from 6 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48471970

Legend2440•51m ago

Bad headline. Popular ad blockers have already switched to MV3, and MV2 has already been disabled for all users.

nicce•36m ago

Most would not consider MV3 versions as ”adblockers” anymore.

spankalee•34m ago

Yeah, I think calling the Mv3 versions "secure adblockers" would be more accurate.

WesolyKubeczek•29m ago

Secure for whom?

spankalee•14m ago

Browser users. Pre Mv3 extensions were a huge vector for malware. My in-laws were hit by that.

jdiff•9m ago

You can write malicious MV3 extensions. The changes' stated reason was performance, not security.

curt15•27m ago

How about "nerfed adblockers"? Do any of the MV3 versions replicate the full power of ublock origin on Firefox? (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...)

romanovcode•48m ago

Firefox is great. Safari is also pretty good, Apple ADP is true e2e encrypted bookmarks, history and so on. I really do not see the reason to be using Chrome for multiple years now.

hirako2000•40m ago

Brave, Vivaldi (successor of opera), a few others also based on chromium work just fine. No ads.

bilekas•25m ago

I'm also on brave and they've promised support for M2 for the future but they're of course a fork of chromium, so we'll have to see how committed they are to implement improvements that they can't simply merge in due to conflicting behaviours. Which you can almost guarantee Google will do.

dbbk•36m ago

This is just not true

jdiff•8m ago

An expansion rather than just a contradiction would be welcome. In what way is it not true?

Noaidi•34m ago

I do not mind advertising on websites. What I mind is bad ads, ads with malware, way too many ads, and ads that track me. This is where Google gets the whole ad thing wrong. They are focusing on the wrong problem.

If you think about the economics of it, a very popular website could survive on only on ad because the advertiser would pay a premium to be seen on the website.

So that is my other argument, bad websites need a whole bunch of ads to be profitable. So better websites would help as well.

tartoran•30m ago

The thing is that they don’t care about what you and I mind or don’t mind. The only goal is to maximize profit to shareholders. Our only option is to use ad blockers for now.

OkayPhysicist•21m ago

The problem with that logic is that if one advertiser is willing to pay a premium for placement on the site, more advertisers likely are. Which perverse incentive to inject exactly as many ads as most users will put up with, which shifts the users' perspective on the amount of acceptable ads, which encourages more ad placement. Rinse, repeat until you reach the current state of affairs.

AustinDev•33m ago

This is your sign to start using a DNS based ad/tracking blocker. Run it on your VPS with tailscale if you want it available everywhere without significant security overhead.

MrDrMcCoy•23m ago

DNS adblocking doesn't catch everything.

rschiavone•32m ago

I remember when they first announced it years ago and they pretended to care by walking back the change. As always, the strategy is to wait for the dust to settle and then push the changes again.

archerx•22m ago

Well it got me to uninstall chrome so that’s something.

dwa3592•26m ago

I use brave and it seems to work just fine against ads. Brave also has lower memory consumption than google chrome.

mgrunwald_•21m ago

Chrome is the new Internet Exploder.

Use anything with built-in adblock-rust.

ChrisArchitect•14m ago

[dupe]

Source links only please

Discussions:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48471970

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555244

mrbluecoat•13m ago

Better title: “Google Chrome's Next Update Will Drive Privacy-Minded Users To Other Browsers“

Snyk VulnBench JavaScript 1.0: Can LLMs Find the Same Bugs Twice?

Fake Viral Guitarists Strike Again

Hackers Publish Knicks and Madison Square Garden Data Online

Biff.fx: lightweight effects system for Clojure

Yes, we still need engineers

Ask HN: What do you think about blockchain's current trajectory

Google's Training Supercomputers from TPU v2 to Ironwood: Five Generations

Can LLM Agents Infer World Models? Evidence from Agentic Automata Learning

Apache Fory Serialization 1.2.0: JDK 25 support without sun.misc.Unsafe

Earth's underground fungal network would span 10% of the Milky Way

Qwen-RobotWorld Technical Report

JoyAI-VL-Interaction: Real-Time Vision-Language Interaction Intelligence

Making ast.walk 220x Faster

A Short Explanation of the Zettelkasten Method

Robinhood to cut 10% of workforce in restructuring

The ongoing debacle of hiring a fake coworker

Uncritical use of AI causes countrywide scandal at Starbucks Korea

Agent Architecture Is a Compute Allocation Problem: The Advisor Strategy

How we evaluate our LLM judge

Can gzip be a language model?

The Faithfulness of LLMs as Solvers and Autoformalizers in Legal Reasoning

The AI Hype – Too Costly – Alternative Rock, Original Lyrics [Video]

The Same Hetzner VM Cost $60 Last Week. Today It Costs $154

Python 3.13 gets a JIT (2024)

TreeTrace, Git records what changed;this records how you steer your LLM sessions

Never Talk to the Police. Period

Databricks Acquires Panther

Show HN: Sentinel – prevent duplicate execution using Postgres

GateGPT: 56k tokens per second Transformer (KV cache) on FPGA at 80 MHz

Hardware Is Asynchronous. Most of Our Operating Systems Still Aren't