> For a significantly shorter critque of the book, check out qntm's critique. I mostly agree with qntm assessment. But it's a bit too emotional and personal and doesn't cover the parts i find the most harmful.

This page seems like an actual critique while the blog post doesn't offer much of one, am I missing something?

edit: There is a github linked towards the bottom of the post... full of LLM emoji exclamations.

We deserve better