Hey HN, I need to take step back regarding the PR review process. As everyone is saying AI let's us write way more line of code than before, we have code reviewers that are somewhat relevant, we all know the current state of software engineering.

But... to me PR reviews is still the bottleneck, I still think it's important to have ownership over the code that is merge to main branch, everyone should still have a ownership towards his own code but in order to all progress at the same time towards a codebase that grows faster than ever before how do we do it?

Also how do you not end up mentally dried after reviewing 5 PRs in a day (I'm working on a open-source project which add a bit of complexity as well).

We are trying multiple things: PR author adds comments regarding what should be looked at, labels easy/hard review, PR reviews in pair (author + reviewer).

What are you doing? Do you have a better UI than GitHub or IDEs ones?