“Who Governs Autonomous AI Execution? — Execution Governance AI (EGA) V9: A Deterministic Runtime Governance Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous Workflows”
I'm now preparing to submit this work to arXiv. As an independent researcher without an academic network, my submission requires endorsement from an eligible arXiv author in the relevant category.
If you're eligible to endorse in the relevant arXiv category and are willing to take a look at the paper, please reach out:
contact@lcm3.com
Any help would be sincerely appreciated. Thank you in advance.
verdverm•33m ago
> EGA V9 achieved 100% detection performance with 0% false-positive and
false-negative rates
This is a big red flag, you should double check your work or reevaluate your evaluation data. No one gets a perfect score
There is no related work section, no comparison to existing methods. Gaps from standard research papers
Aside from the contents, peddling for endorsements is faux pas on HN
lcm3•41m ago
“Who Governs Autonomous AI Execution? — Execution Governance AI (EGA) V9: A Deterministic Runtime Governance Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous Workflows”
Available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22003768 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22003768
I'm now preparing to submit this work to arXiv. As an independent researcher without an academic network, my submission requires endorsement from an eligible arXiv author in the relevant category.
If you're eligible to endorse in the relevant arXiv category and are willing to take a look at the paper, please reach out:
contact@lcm3.com
Any help would be sincerely appreciated. Thank you in advance.
verdverm•33m ago
This is a big red flag, you should double check your work or reevaluate your evaluation data. No one gets a perfect score
There is no related work section, no comparison to existing methods. Gaps from standard research papers
Aside from the contents, peddling for endorsements is faux pas on HN