The 95th-percentile latency and packet-loss targets here seem much more meaningful than another 2x headline speed increase.
My only scepticism is how much of this survives real consumer hardware. Wi-Fi 6 had things like OFDMA that sounded great on paper, but support/implementation was pretty uneven.
One of the core features (MLO) is currently mostly scam. APs/Clients negotiate the protocol (and it shows up in the status) but doesn't it to either increase robustness or bandwidth.
Also the driver quality is a huge mess.
(We tested it using the latest generation Cisco Enterprise gear but also with Prosumer stuff like Ubiquiti or TP-Link)
But honestly: we need WiFi-8. It finally brings infrastructure-controlled roaming which is super important for any VoIP service.
Note to tech reports: do not EVER quote this metric as it is the most useless piece of information.
802.11 r/k/v exists
LoganDark•40m ago
trvz•30m ago
LoganDark•25m ago
gib444•19m ago
riobard•11m ago
tveyben•8m ago
I would expect this crowd here to not make these mistakes as ofte. :-)
B is defacto for storage…
Gigachad•15m ago
Modern wifi is fast enough that using cables is often not required.
Reason077•5m ago