A Note from LWN

156•rwky•54m ago

Comments

AlexB138•44m ago

LWN is one of the, if not the single, highest signal tech publications around. I hope they're able to maintain a stable subscription service. Being user funded, and avoiding having to maintain allegiance to advertisers, is likely part of why their quality is so high.

giancarlostoro•34m ago

Not only that but lwn is one of the main sites that gets submitted to HN all year round (not daily, but maybe nearish to daily). So the audience here on HN has been exposed to it over the years. I'm not sure what more they could do to get new subscribers, I certainly hope they figure that out or how to get new ways to earn revenue without having to go the ad route.

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=lwn.net

rdpintqogeogsaa•32m ago

That's the thing though. You can get all the value from LWN through here. Even if it wasn't for them tolerating subscriber links being posted on HN, the week-long delay isn't nearly enough an incentive to actually subscribe, rationally speaking.

roryirvine•28m ago

I think the generosity and straightforwardness are a big part of the attraction for many subscribers.

They've always respected their readers and I hope that continues to pay off.

giancarlostoro•26m ago

Easy to say until they have to eventually make the hard decision to shut down.

tonyarkles•19m ago

Rationally-speaking, maybe not. I’ve been a long-time subscriber. When I first subscribed, my day-to-day involved embedded Linux and getting the “breaking news” was pretty valuable. These days I still do that somewhat but I’m stuck on a crusty vendor kernel and anything I read about a kernel newer than 5.15 is going to land on my desk in approximately 2028… but I still subscribe, mostly with a patronage mindset: I don’t acutely get value from the subscription every week, but I think it’s a community service and I’m happy to pitch in a few bucks to keep it alive.

birdieop•15m ago

They could also consider paying their employees less.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38106227

microtonal•43m ago

Thanks LWN team for the honest and straightforward post! The prices you ask are well worth it for the incredible value that LWN provides.

I forgot to renew my subscription a while back and it has been a bit busy, will renew now.

roryirvine•39m ago

Seems like only yesterday when they last increased their prices but it was, in fact, back in January 2022 - time flies!

I'll have been an LWN subscriber for 22 years as of next week, and am very happy to continue to be one. It's easily the most worthwhile subscription I currently have.

thataccount•38m ago

LWN, probably about to discover people are paying high prices for all manner of things and will find that LWN is, sadly, a disposable entity to pay for.

dcow•37m ago

Based on the initial response, it does not, in fact, seem like this is the conclusion.

giancarlostoro•33m ago

They could always bump down a tier if needed, they have 6 months to decide anyway.

mrweasel•29m ago

You could also see if it's something your employer allows to to expense. It's still cheap enough that it's something most managers can just approve directly, depending on organizational structures.

bryanlarsen•28m ago

I suspect everybody likely to do so has already done so. Anybody who thinks $6 a month is a lot of money will also think $5 a month is a lot of money for something that they can get for free by waiting a week.

thataccount•20m ago

5 to 6 dollars is not much in terms of a donation. In terms of a subscription, though...One thing is voluntary if you find value, the other is mandatory to get to the value unless you are willing to wait.

Diederich•30m ago

LWN is one of the cornerstones of my very successful career.

Starting from the beginning, I have (at least) read through every story and every article, every week, since 1998. Especially in the beginning, there was a lot in each article I didn't understand. I would try to do some digging into those topics.

One way or another, just the weekly exposure to absolutely top notch technical writing was foundational to me.

When newer folk would ask me how to really get good with Linux, I would always point them to LWN.net.

I've been a subscriber since the beginning. That small investment is the least I can do given the incalculable value LWN has brought to me.

simonebrunozzi•14m ago

Sorry to be that guy, but... Please consider donating a significant amount to them, given that they have been a cornerstone of your very successful career.

I did something similar in the past, in relation to Ubuntu, and I never regretted it, even if that money would have been very useful if spent in other ways.

Diederich•6m ago

I will be doing just that today.

farlight•25m ago

I know the editors visit these discussions: please, next time use a more descriptive title! I nearly had a fit when I saw that, really thought LWN is going down like it almost did 20 years ago.

Happy to pay the new price, even though I can only afford the cheapest tier.

0xbadc0de5•16m ago

tl;dr - LWN is raising their prices 20%.

I have no opinion since I'm not a subscriber, just adding for clarity since the title is ambiguous.

Just bury your trash: What if everything we know about recycling is wrong?

No Jibber Jabber – Mr. T–themed skill to cut AI preamble

Inadvertent Actions Such as Using Easy Passwords: Beginners Cybersecurity Guide

Apple Maps Follows Google, Changes Name of Lake Ontario to 'Lake America'

Goodbye Bitcoin, Hello AI Data Center

Show HN: AsciiQuake

Why I run Claude on a remote server

What the Hale?

Graphics editor without toolbar: Breaking 50yr UX tradition, surprising effect

Cursor-based sync vs. Change Data Capture: what you're missing

Show HN: Freefund – Reduce no shows at free/RSVP events

Join FETCH May Not Save You: checking seven JPA N+1 beliefs against the SQL

WebLLM: high-performance in-browser LLM inference engine

The Telegram Scam That Steals Your Account with One Code

PgDog vs. RDS Proxy

GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

Three sites made 215,128 "best software" pages for AI. Perplexity cites them

When the Shell Breaks Your Arrow Keys

tldraw offline

57% of sites that block GPTBot leave ChatGPT-User wide open

Heides, deterministic code harness giving AI agents senses and judgment

Load Testing ReARM: 20k SBOMs per Run Across Four OCI Registries

Show HN: Open protocol for AI agents to discover, negotiate, and pay each other

Don’t Believe Robotics Demo Videos

Dark matter hunters may have spotted a hint of the particles

Show HN: Kafma – a desktop Kafka GUI client for debugging

Chronicle used ~210M tokens of my ChatGPT quota in 70 days before I found it

Show HN: Skywarden – Smart astrophotography planning companion

Blast Radius (every fix has a blast radius)

Knowledge Graph Engine for Codebases