ICC judge on what U.S. sanctions mean for her and global courts

https://www.npr.org/2026/10/01/nx-s1-5977815/trump-icc-sanctions-kimberly-prost

120•rbanffy•1h ago

Comments

msdz•50m ago

Regardless of what one personally thinks about the ICC, this isn’t a good look for neither the US nor Europe.

For the U.S., because sanctioning an “unpleasant”, but in essence harmless individual (geopolitically speaking) is ridiculous. Falling victim to de-banking alone can really ruin one’s life.

And for the EU, because it once again showcases the dependence on U.S. systems for just about anything tech-related in everyday life and work.

wereHamster•40m ago

EU is not necessarily dependent on the US in all the cases that are listed in the article. Take AXA, the insurance company. They could probably survive doing business just in the EU and withdraw entirely out of the US market. But for them it's more lucrative to piss off one judge rather than lose the US share of profits. As the article describes, it's a business decision. But not one that necessarily means life or death (for the company).

QDwQ1•29m ago

EU politicians should grow some balls and force their companies to ignore US sanctions in cases like these

msdz•26m ago

I’ve read that at least in the case of some EU banks, not following the foreign sanctions is quite literally not an option for them.

If you don’t follow sanctions, other banks either with branches doing business in the U.S., or their partner banks, will refuse to continue banking with you out of fear for not following sanctions – which include banks enabling sanction-circumvention. Essentially, even if the bank doesn’t want to deal with USD (which most banks would still like to do!), you’re still bound by the sanctions. A bank won’t survive long or well if it’s cut off from a majority of other banks.

RobotToaster•9m ago

Which is why it would need to be a law. The only option would be for the US to take the insane move of cutting off every bank in Europe. If they did actually do that, while it would be painful in the short term, it would be incredibly beneficial for Europe in the long term.

cherryteastain•7m ago

This is just a case of carrot vs stick. European countries need to threaten their companies with an even bigger stick if they follow foreign sanctions.

China does this via laws that say, if you do not provide services to Chinese citizens/entities citing foreign sanctions, they can send you to a gulag forever. Seems to be fairly effective, considering how heavily sanctioned Huawei is.

beached_whale•13m ago

Canada did this for the Cuba sanctions years ago. There was/is a semi famous story about Walmart Canada and Cuban PJ's.

abdullahkhalids•25m ago

My understanding from glancing at the hopefully correct sanctions statement [1] is that they are secondary in nature (see for example Sec 3). So the insurance company will face all the same sanctions that the ICC judge is facing if they serve them. They banks will cutoff the insurance company as well, because the banks themselves use US infrastructure.

The only solution would be similar to what China exercised. The EU passes an order telling all EU entities to not comply with US sanctions or face legal problems. Then it comes down to how the US responds and whether EU can take that hit.

[1] https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/impo...

RobotToaster•7m ago

> The only solution would be similar to what China exercised. The EU passes an order telling all EU entities to not comply with US sanctions or face legal problems

Unfortunately, the fact that they haven't done this just makes the EU look like a paper tiger.

nostrademons•25m ago

It undermines the idea of the U.S. as a neutral arbiter for law, order, and free commerce. That may always have been a fiction, but it's a very useful fiction because it underpins U.S. soft power. It's much easier to get consent for being the world hegemon when you act like a benevolent, disinterested hegemon. Once you start becoming a participant - and overriding other institutions that are ostensibly providing neutral, impartial justice just because their decisions are inconvenient for you - you are essentially placing yourself below them and undermining your own legitimacy.

Neutrality and objectivity may be a fiction, but it's one of the most useful fictions that have been invented in the last 500 years.

appreciatorBus•18m ago

> overriding other institutions that are ostensibly providing neutral, impartial justice just because their decisions are inconvenient for you

I think this is the key - at what point do we consider the ICC decisions inconvenient vs actively hostile to US sovereignty & western civilization as a whole? If this was about inconvenience I would see your point, but if the ICC can arrest anyone who defends themselves after being attacked, then it's a useless institution and should be disbanded and ignored.

jfengel•12m ago

America has apparently decided that the fiction is no longer useful. At least not to us.

I can't say I'm happy about that, but it's a fact now. We cannot put that genie back in the bottle. Even a change of leadership soon will not alter the realization that it can change back on a moment's notice.

So... we will find out.

laimewhisps•10m ago

I think we will come to realize that liberalism died in Gaza. It exposed all of the hypocrisy that had always been there, it was just hidden under a mask of propaganda. Exposure to the raw events on social media allowed people to see the difference between what was happening and what we were being told. The mask came off and it's not going back on.

MSFT_Edging•24m ago

> Falling victim to de-banking alone

This is especially ironic given how many Trump supporters had "de-banking" as their main issue.

IIRC most of them were "debanked" due to crypto fraud or other financial crimes.

DaSHacka•13m ago

> IIRC most of them were "debanked" due to crypto fraud or other financial crimes.

How would you even know this? Was there a poll done across every Trump supporter where they admitted to committing financial fraud? Do you mean to say Trump's 'pundits' and not his 'supporters'?

Also, the majority of pushback to debanking that I've seen among MAGA types I know IRL is more centered around the 2022 trucker protests and the debatably unjust reaction from the Canadian government.

koolba•24m ago

> Regardless of what one personally thinks about the ICC, this isn’t a good look for neither the US nor Europe.

> For the U.S., because sanctioning an “unpleasant”, but in essence harmless individual (geopolitically speaking) is ridiculous. Falling victim to de-banking alone can really ruin one’s life.

Not a good look sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s effective over the near term. Especially if they keep expanding this to include more of the ICC bench.

That’s the whole point of such sanctions anyway. It might feel different because it’s a Canadian judge and not a Russian oligarch. But at the core the USA wants to put pressure on something and the means is indirectly applied to an individual.

dmitrygr•22m ago

> Regardless of what one personally thinks about the ICC, this isn’t a good look

Legitimate question. Why should a third party (whom I do not respect)’s opinion of me matter to me? Do you care what my cat thinks about you?

delichon•19m ago

Leaders of republics are still somewhat dependent on popularity, a bug they are working hard to fix.

rwmj•17m ago

Depending on where you live, your country may or may not have decided to give legal force to ICC rulings by joining the Rome Statute treaty (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome_Statute). If you live in a democracy, this was decided by democratic means, and can be changed the same way. This is not a unique situation, there will be many, many other treaties that your country has decided to sign up to.

dmitrygr•14m ago

Luckily my country is not a party. I don’t want my government (that I elect) outsourcing any decision-making power to a body I do not elect (ICC). As a voter this is a hard NO for me.

rwmj•10m ago

That's fine, it's democracy in action. I don't know why particularly you'd be worried about ICC rulings since they apply to very grave crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the "crime of aggression" (using large scale military forces to invade other countries). Hope you've not been doing any of those!

slowin•50m ago

> "You start to lose services from American companies, Amazon, Google, potentially Apple, whatever it may be,"

> Her credit cards, issued in the Netherlands and Canada, were canceled. She has managed to keep some bank accounts, but says her banking services are extremely limited and even small transfers can be blocked.

> One of the most serious examples is her health insurance. Prost receives coverage through AXA, the French company that provides insurance for the court. She says the company has refused to pay her claims even though it is not legally required to follow the U.S. sanctions.

This is beyond chilling. You could conceivably self-host some alternatives, although you could easily lose your domain name and internet access. Maybe in a fictional future some sort of crypto currency could help with the de-banking. I don't think there's a solution for losing your health insurance though.

All because the US doesn't want Israel to be held accountable in the ICC. I don't think we've ever been closer to fascism and it's in service for a foreign country (not that it would be ok if it wasn't!).

elAhmo•48m ago

These sanctions are a prime example of influence of a foreign nation on the USA policies.

Planktonne•45m ago

> "We are judges, and we are being told that rather than deciding our cases on the basis of the facts and the law before us, as we are duty bound to do, we're being asked to decide the cases or not decide them in accordance with the wishes of the U.S. government," she said.

Just incredibly naked corruption.

JSR_FDED•39m ago

This is at once thuggish and petty. If the US Govt doesn’t recognize the ICC then…don’t? Going after individual judges is mafia tactics.

It’s also guaranteed to backfire - no judge who by definition deeply believes in the mission and legitimacy of the ICC is going to be deterred by these tactics.

jeroenhd•26m ago

The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu because of the genocide Israel is committing, that's what upset the Americans. I doubt even Trump would go this far if it wasn't for that.

PorciiVorbesc•8m ago

> that's what upset the Americans

Which Americans? I think it mostly upset the Zionists and Israel(AIPAC) bought members of congress including the US presidential administration, but I imagine a large part of US voter base don't agree with this if polled.

hananova•38m ago

Then it is high time to make the company legally required not to follow the U.S. sanctions.

PorciiVorbesc•10m ago

>Then it is high time to make the company legally required not to follow the U.S. sanctions.

Preach, it's not like the US is gagging for it when it comes to following EU laws and sanctions either.

hliyan•35m ago

In the modern world, to deprive someone of access to the banking system, internet connectivity, or access to their digital identity, is similar to depriving someone of housing or clothing. They're necessities for participation in modern society, so this amounts to a civil death sentence or civiliter mortuus.

ArcHound•27m ago

There is just no alternative to Microsoft. Since they push everything into cloud MS gets centralised control. Cutting MS literally cuts the person off from anything digital.

There is some movement to reduce MS dependency in Europe, but it's not yet there. Until then, this will be a huge lever available to US.

I've written about this back in the day: https://blog.miloslavhomer.cz/microsoft-dependency-has-risks...

Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44381358

franczesko•19m ago

All of this, because one war criminal can't come to Europe anymore

jazzyjackson•19m ago

You can’t convince me that this administration isn’t intentionally driving this country into the ground. Our whole economic growth story is basically that our tech companies can provide service to 8 billion people, not just 0.35 B Americans. Moves like this makes buying American (or even just watching YouTube) toxic.

Edit: not to mention moving our allies toward not complying with US sanctions at all, reducing American soft power

Drupon•16m ago

Normalize hanging in the Hague again. US politicians should not be able to strongarm international law like this and freely visit Europe.

anon291•10m ago

Europeans have a superiority complex in believing their law is 'international'. It's not. American law rests on a joint agreement among the governed. The American people have never agreed to be governed by a foreign court.

laimewhisps•7m ago

I'm American and I never once agreed to any of our laws. Countries have a monopoly on violence, that is it. You can agree, disagree and try to survive or hope some other country will let you immigrate.

That being said, I think the vast majority of Americans are ok with the ICC holding people committing genocide accountable. Most Americans also do not like the influence Israel has on our country and these sanctions are just yet more proof that we are occupied and not even operating in our government's own interests.

tgv•5m ago

> Europeans have a superiority complex in believing their law is 'international'.

Do you even know what the ICC is based on?

> American law rests on a joint agreement among the governed.

No, it doesn't.

> The American people have never agreed to be governed by a foreign court.

That's the first true statement in your reply, and it means they can simply ignore the court. It doesn't mean targeting the employees of the court. That's just the US govt. being thugs.

UncleOxidant•8m ago

I would hope the French gov would step in and pay her claims directly.

Show HN: Web server with built-in metrics and analytics dashboard for any sites

What If We Stopped Using GPUs? [video]

Prozac use for childhood depression skewed by single flawed medical trial

Leaderboards and speedrun.com's new terms of service

AI didn't kill programming, you did

Small Long Covid antibody trial had one striking before/after gut tissue result

Show HN: I'm color blind, so I built a way to show people how I see

Migrating 300 namespaces from self-hosted Temporal to Temporal Cloud

Rethinking LLM Serving with System One Models

From the creator of Redis; run LLM locally with ds4

New tool means no more CAD needed when 3D print desiging

A couple tiny Codex TUI features

Qubes OS 4.3.2 has been released

I have used GPT-6 Astra to decipher two Catholic League letters from 1593

Buying an RTX 5090? You Need to Promise You Won't Export It First

Show HN: 78,000 free books to my "Pomodoro for books" Mac app

Kiwi. A Windows-native modal terminal editor with WASD navigation

Postgres is now the most efficient search database at scale

Ask HN: If you had an unlimited token budget, what would you build?

There's a New Sea Spider in Town

Show HN: Arda – Marketing agents to help brands win Google and AI Search

Jev for Python Engineers

MIT Alumni Forum: The Collision: What AI Does to Us [video]

Anthropic Nearly Walked Out on Pope Leo XIV's AI Encyclical

Show HN: Levenshtein – Curated Go lint rules and CI checks

US job growth slows sharply in September; unemployment rate rises to 4.2%

Amundsen's Maxim

After 15 years, I am leaving tech

Driving the GDEH0154D67 e-paper display with Rust

Israeli filmmakers launch counter-documentary to rebut 'NAZA'