— via https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Disp...
The DA is serious about "in any matter."
However, people need to get it in their heads that they're not chatting with their secret BFF, they're chatting with Big Tech. Before LLMs, Big Tech had no way to scrutinize the bulk of what was going on within their services, so you could have a secret hate diary in Google Docs. Now, everything you say or write can be automatically screened for red flags on a planetary scale, and probably will be because that's what the regulators and "concerned citizens" will demand. In a couple of years, you'll be biting your tongue a lot more often in private chats.
altmanaltman•27m ago
Thought crimes are real when you're sharing your thoughts with Claude
Guvante•19m ago
danpalmer•16m ago
bossyTeacher•12m ago
Summary: don't type in Claude anything you wouldn't like a human to read.
jimbob45•9m ago
foolfoolz•17m ago
https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/everyone-deserves-to-die...
https://www.wdsu.com/article/maryland-high-school-student-ch...
https://www.pinellassheriff.gov/21-023-deputies-arrest-pinel...
danpalmer•11m ago
JumpCrisscross•8m ago
I think it’s valid to ask if tapping something into Claude is legitimately transmitting a threat.
I don’t think it is. I also think the sheriff could have found more-substantial evidence if she was actually planning domestic terrorism.