frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Ask HN: How would you feel if we nationalized Google?

6•59percentmore•58m ago
Not enough space in the title, the actual scenario is this:

A hypothetical US gov't, benevolent and markedly less corrupt than the current one, passes a Constitutional amendment to nationalize Alphabet, with the express intent to return Google Search to 2010 levels of efficacy and to remove all LLM functions from both its frontend and backend.

I guess what I'm really asking is what people would abide to have the internet back, via a search solution that actually works and whose usefulness hasn't been annihilated by ~15 years of cynical corporate marauding and product torture.

Comments

JohnFen•54m ago
I'd be opposed to nationalizing Google. There are way too many downsides.

I think, if we're going to be heavy-hitting about this, the more proper thing to do is to force Google to split their search off as a separate, independent company that has additional business requirements imposed on it to rectify the issues.

But I really think that, if search is the worry, the market will eventually achieve its own kind of balance and you'll find an acceptable alternative to Google's that restores much of what has been lost. For me, that's already the case.

aeonik•54m ago
I'd feel better if standard protocols and open datasets were maintained.

That way anybody could build their own "old search", or innovate off the global dataset.

Computer0•51m ago
I am not sure who I hate and distrust more… Google or the US Government. Probably the US Government. To have a hypothetical benevolent us government you would need revisions to history earlier than 1776
tonyarkles•40m ago
The thing that I always come back to whenever some kind of heavy-handed government intervention is proposed: what would the other side use this same power to do? OP explicitly called out a hypothetical benevolent US government, but the government changes every 4 years. Even if there were such a hypothetical benevolent government in power when this happened, 4 years later it could be something entirely different.
JohnFen•33m ago
I think that huge corporations such as Google are effectively an integral part of the US government at this point anyway.
joegibbs•47m ago
I like the LLM functions. If you brought back the 2010 algorithm it would just be swamped with SEO-optimised spam.
denkmoon•43m ago
The problem is the monopoly not the private nature of the enterprise. Bust that trust.
jmcgough•42m ago
I don't think we can ever go back, and I'm not as convinced of the value of nationalizing Google, but it's clear that the monopolies held by massive tech companies are actively hurting society. Alphabet needs to be broken apart.
chris_dev•41m ago
Depends on the reason. The government basically nationalized a lot of manufacturers in WW II. During the 2008 Financial Crisis they took over Freddie and Fannie. Look the government has enormous powers that are uncomfortable. But they have them for a reason. Ultimately the government is supposed to be an expression of the will of the people.

Edit:

"annihilated by ~15 years of cynical corporate marauding and product torture" - I'm with ya man, wrote my rant on this topic the other day https://chriswebb09.github.io/our-ai-reality

benoau•41m ago
Probably the easiest solution is to make mandatory search engine selection screens, and provide a fat grant for Firefox so they don't face an existential threat without Google's money. Puts some pressure on Google to compete since every percent is a billion bucks they lost, and if it's anything like browser selection screens the people choosing other options snowball over time.

Otherwise you need to break Google up just to separate search from ads, lot of complexity in that and adversity from big tech.

ButlerianJihad•39m ago
No, no, let's nationalize DEC and get our VAXen back! Then we can have AltaVista running atop OpenVMS, the way that God intended! And Windows 13 on Alpha AXP!!! Awesome man! I can't wait for my SGI GPU!

Seriously though, this is a bizarre proposition. Google hasn't been a "Search Company" for decades. Google is not there to search the web for you. Internet users need to grow up. From this Iron Age of the Internet where we bashed the keyboard with "google search" to find whatever we wanted there. Ask any reference librarian, how to intelligently build a toolbox of bookmarks and resources, and use those resources to look up stuff that you want instead.

I do not use Google Search, or Bing Search or any other, except in the dumbest of circumstances. I already know where such searches would've sent me, so I go to those sites and I query them instead. It's not rocket science.

But that ship has sailed and the Days of Search Engines is in a notable sunset phase. It is simply impractical to build and maintain a search engine when LLMs are taking over. The LLM is your search engine now. Learn it, love it, bash it, Bronze Ager.

brandonmenc•37m ago
Sorry, but you’re crazy.

There is absolutely no way I can ever go back to vanilla web search vs Gemini.

verdverm•25m ago
same, except custom setup, so much better than what they spoon feed
md3911027514•37m ago
So the problem is that the quality of its products would fall dramatically and then everyone would move to products offered by other large tech companies…
throwitaway222•37m ago
Cray cray
demo4567•36m ago
Firefox needs a national grant instead. Google is too far gone as a monopoly and that would mean setting precendent for other monopolies. Unlikely to happen anytime soon
verdverm•26m ago
What about Vivaldi?
W3cUYxYwmXb5c•34m ago
Just don't use google search. I haven't used it in years.
akst•34m ago
> A hypothetical US gov't, benevolent and markedly less corrupt than the current one

If we’re pretending this is taking place in another reality what are we hoping to learn from this hypothetical?

> with the express intent to return Google Search to 2010 levels of efficacy and to remove all LLM functions from both its frontend and backend

It would be simpler for the US govt to build such a search engine like that today as google was a lot simpler back then, however it wouldn’t work because the internet has changed as much as Google has.

If the goal is to make the internet search better via intervention it might be simpler to force Google to share relevant patents for free with competitors and new market entrants, and doesn’t require a benevolent government to work either.

Even without that kagi exists and it’s fine

staticshock•33m ago
2010's Google search code has been gamed many times over by sophisticated SEO schemes. So you can't bring it back "as it was". Best you can do is to restore its mission to "organize the world's information", but today's problems (e.g. AI slop) demand a new wave of technological innovation for them just to keep their head above water.

Also, it's funny you brought up politics, as if the current political regime is the last corrupt one we'll ever have. If you have the incentives for corruption in place, you will have more corruption. If you give Google to the government, it will use Google to support that corruption. The Trump era is a great time to be asking, "would I want the government to have even more control?", because there will be another Trump eventually.

vannevar•30m ago
I think we're well past the time when we should have created an actual public commons instead of pretending that a patchwork of private online services constituted one. The commercial internet sits on a foundation of attention and deception, neither of which is hospitable to truth. I'm not sure that nationalizing Google would change that.
michaelt•29m ago
The hypothetical situation is a benevolent, honest and competent US government, 100% guaranteed, for all eternity?

That sounds great, regardless of the Google stuff.

229-T•25m ago
> hypothetical US gov't, benevolent and markedly less corrupt than the current one, passes a Constitutional amendment to nationalize Alphabet, with the express intent to return Google Search to 2010 levels of efficacy and to remove all LLM functions from both its frontend and backend.

And the next one? And the one after that? How about the one after that?

1potato•23m ago
The problems come from companies becoming so large that competing with them is essentially impossible. Fix that, and the rest will take care of itself.
SyneRyder•22m ago
If you're just wanting a better search, you want to talk to the folks around Brave, Mojeek, Marginalia (and especially read all of the Marginalia blog), Greppr, Yep. People who are building their own search indexes. Also give Kagi and maybe Uruky a try, two metasearch engines. Also look into what asciimoo is doing with Hister (and previously SearXNG). There's also the EU Search Perspective project.

Much of this is just about building out the index. (Yes yes, "just", I know folks at Google will yell at me that I have no idea what's required at scale, and they're absolutely right. I also know that Google REALLY do not like people building any kind of competition, no matter how tiny.) Some have done the work, Yep has a huge index they've built from their Ahrefs work. Obviously Brave is already there, it probably already powers the web search for your favorite LLM.

For everyday use, you often don't need the whole index though. You just need your corner of the web indexed, the tiny section that you use frequently.

Rather than nationalizing it, and being subject to whatever government decides... for the internet that you personally want, your own personal index is the most true answer. Only then will it find the information you want, with the rankings that you want.

0gs•4m ago
is anybody selling a white label private web indexer/cacher for normies?
xnx•21m ago
You can't have "2010 levels of efficacy" on 2026 web.

I much prefer Google today than in 2010. I very rarely look at web pages (full of all kinds of bad design, unnecessary text, and ads) now. Google gives me the information directly.

OpenAI just dropped 700 preprints of mathematical proofs and counterexamples

https://github.com/openai/math/tree/main/preprints
1•tootie•2m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Jrs – A Cargo-like build tool for Java, written in Rust

https://getjrs.dev
1•piotrwittchen•3m ago•0 comments

The Si Wealth Transfer Is Becoming the Largest Rug Pull in History

https://medium.com/@vektormemory/the-si-wealth-transfer-is-becoming-the-largest-rug-pull-in-histo...
1•vektormemory•4m ago•1 comments

David Bushell's Valley Fold website is now live

https://valleyfold.co.uk/
2•yhavin•10m ago•0 comments

AnyPS5: Port PS5 binaries to PC without emulation (87% system libraries mapped)

https://github.com/boykopovar/AnyPS5
2•Fe2O3•11m ago•1 comments

Building a Better Working Dog

https://www.science.org/content/article/can-science-build-better-working-dog
2•bucket2015•12m ago•0 comments

Do you support shutting down air travel for 2 months to control Russia plague?

2•johndavid9991•13m ago•4 comments

State of Devs 2026 survey results: developers are exhausted

https://2026.stateofdevs.com/en-US/
2•sgdesign•13m ago•0 comments

Microsite that tracks the NAV of SK Square

https://sk-square-observatory.alexdwu13.chatgpt.site/
2•alexdwu1•18m ago•0 comments

Where do we draw the line on AI in court filings?

https://lexifina.com/blog/where-to-draw-the-line-on-ai-in-court-filings
2•alansaber•18m ago•0 comments

How to restore your online sanity, one webcam at a time

https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/webcam-maps-are-back/
2•GreyWolfhead•22m ago•0 comments

The Plunging Price of Thought

https://epoch.ai/publications/the-plunging-price-of-thought
2•gmays•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Show HN: InterPoll, signed posts replicated over Gun relays/browsers

https://github.com/Interpoll1/decentralised
2•thegoodduck•24m ago•0 comments

Read the 722 new OpenAI math papers

https://hub.valency.io/collections/openai-math
2•curtis-jm•24m ago•0 comments

Integer multiplication below n log n

https://github.com/openai/math/tree/main/preprints/Integer-multiplication-below-n-log-n-September...
2•E-Reverance•25m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What games do you religiously play on your phone browser?

2•saimiam•27m ago•2 comments

White House monitors suspected plague outbreak in Russia

https://www.yahoo.com/news/science/articles/scoop-white-house-monitors-suspected-201829093.html
3•gmays•33m ago•0 comments

Add your GitHub profile in your Apple Wallet

https://walletwallet.alen.ro/github/
2•alentodorov•34m ago•1 comments

Emergence of pan-drug resistant Candidozyma auris in Kenya

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-70653-9
1•Teever•35m ago•0 comments

Put dithered images inside a QR code

https://wowqr.app/
1•alentodorov•39m ago•0 comments

The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis [pdf]

https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/The-Quasi-Riemann-Hypothesis-September-30-2026...
2•akalin•39m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Human flourishing after jobs?

1•humans_thrive•40m ago•10 comments

ChatGPT self-distances when admitting fault

3•chrisjj•42m ago•1 comments

The bad science polluting our media landscape

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/science-and-technology/1772800/the-bad-science-polluting-our-media-lan...
3•billybuckwheat•43m ago•0 comments

UniEvo-VL: Self-Distillation Training for Multimodal Model Self-Improvement

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38721
2•gmays•48m ago•0 comments

AI Hasn't Replaced Interpreters But It Has Degraded Their Working Conditions

https://capitalandmain.com/ai-hasnt-replaced-these-interpreters-but-it-has-degraded-their-working...
2•paimapi•48m ago•1 comments

The uphill climb of making diff lines performant

https://github.blog/engineering/architecture-optimization/the-uphill-climb-of-making-diff-lines-p...
1•bucket2015•52m ago•0 comments

Flow Typing: A New Lens on Linearity [pdf]

https://people.cs.nott.ac.uk/pszgmh/flow-typing.pdf
4•matt_d•54m ago•0 comments

SpaceX looks to raise $40B to buy Nvidia chips in financing led by Apollo

https://www.ft.com/content/d3f5928d-f38c-4666-8f7a-8737f9c45f51
2•mfiguiere•58m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How would you feel if we nationalized Google?

6•59percentmore•58m ago•27 comments