frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Preorder Microsoft Surface RTX Spark Dev Box – Starting at $5,999.99

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/configure/surface-rtx-spark-dev-box/8wg5vqp0x4gr
1•canucker2016•4m ago•2 comments

OpenAI tricked me into switching to a business account

1•probolsky•8m ago•0 comments

Why Do We Need Human Anything Anymore?

https://poshenloh.com/posts/20260919-math-ai
1•nopinsight•8m ago•0 comments

Catching Crumbs from the Table [pdf]

https://gwern.net/doc/fiction/science-fiction/2000-chiang.pdf
2•qingcharles•12m ago•0 comments

EU drops sponsorship of disinformation conference at Trump officials' request

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/07/trump-eu-disinformation-conference
6•rdmuser•17m ago•0 comments

Why Isn't the Industry Freaking Out About DeepSeek 4.1 Flash?

https://www.dgt.is/blog/2026-10-07-deepseek-freek-out/
3•jonotime•22m ago•0 comments

Zpu

https://github.com/zylin/zpu
3•kristianpaul•22m ago•0 comments

AI cluster networking reading list: RDMA, collectives, fabrics

https://github.com/Rewsr/unawesome-ai-fabric-engineering
4•rewsiest•22m ago•0 comments

How to "Tell It Like It Is" More Effectively

https://mgrebler.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-it-like-it-is-more-effectively
4•mgrebler•27m ago•0 comments

Hackers hijack Google domains after breaching ccTLD registries

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-hijack-google-domains-after-breaching-cctl...
4•sbulaev•29m ago•0 comments

100 days later: Microsoft still steers Windows and Copilot users to Edge

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/over-the-edge-2-100-days-later/
5•thimabi•30m ago•1 comments

Bold AI developer takes aim at Adobe with open source clones

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/10/software-is-over-bold-ai-developer-takes-aim-at-adobe-with-ope...
4•pseudolus•30m ago•0 comments

AHM Statement on OpenAI's October 6 Release of Mathematical Documents

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/10/07/ahm-statement-on-openais-october-6-release-of-mathemati...
3•smilelamp•32m ago•1 comments

Amazon employees hit by fresh job cuts across several teams

https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-layoffs-hit-hundreds-of-employees-across-multiple-teams-20...
4•christhecaribou•33m ago•0 comments

Possible plague death at a Siberian lab baffles scientists

https://www.science.org/content/article/possible-plague-death-siberian-lab-baffles-scientists
1•doener•34m ago•0 comments

Learning cardiac dynamics via action-conditioned JEPAs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22618
1•brandonb•37m ago•0 comments

What is the actual percentage of people For and Against AI?

4•Zeruxe•41m ago•18 comments

Goose: Safer, faster and <memory than Rust/C++ for algos where flat data matters

https://github.com/aardappel/goose/blob/master/README.md
4•bobbydigitales•43m ago•1 comments

Priceline to face FTC action over deceptive hotel ads

https://www.reuters.com/world/priceline-owner-face-ftc-action-over-affiliates-hotel-ads-sources-s...
3•JumpCrisscross•45m ago•0 comments

Neural Dynamics as the Composition of Quantized Units

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32487
1•brandonb•45m ago•0 comments

Map of USENET in 1986

https://twitter.com/0xtechnexus/status/2107954052927746241
2•bigwheels•48m ago•0 comments

BizGap – Automated lead generation from Google Maps

https://www.bizgap.online/
1•flaviorodrigues•50m ago•0 comments

Opentunnel – public URLs for anything running on your machine

https://opentunnel.xyz/
2•2bluesc•52m ago•0 comments

California wine glut sends premium bottles to Costco, others

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-10-07/california-wine-glut-sends-premium-bottles-to-c...
2•brandonb•53m ago•2 comments

Kelly's AI Tax Bill Struggles to Link Tech with Economic Harms

https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/kellys-ai-tax-bill-struggles-to-link-te...
3•tldrthelaw•54m ago•0 comments

TXT DNS for Dns.google Contains a Google DNS Xkcd

https://dns.google/query?name=dns.google&rr_type=TXT
2•DoctorOW•55m ago•0 comments

I built a ridiculous game to test decision models vs. 9 LLMs

https://sausagebattlefield.made-by-benny.com/casestudy/
1•bennyr•58m ago•0 comments

Software developers are not okay [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsEpW03gxKg
3•sajithdilshan•59m ago•0 comments

Inner Loops: A Sourcebook for Fast 32-Bit Software Design by Rick Booth (1997)

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0201479605
3•peter_d_sherman•1h ago•0 comments

Mounting Proton Drive in Linux Like in Other OS's

https://oss.lsantos.dev/proton-drive-linux-fs/
1•khaosdoctor•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

What is the actual percentage of people For and Against AI?

4•Zeruxe•41m ago
Ive started to think about it lately, a google search just doesn't yield a satisfiable result.

What do you guys think ? How many people are actually against AI?

Sometimes it feels like the majority are starting to be skeptical, but maybe that's just the environment im surrounded by.

Comments

verdverm•37m ago
The ratios are very different in The Worried West vs The Rest
Zeruxe•29m ago
I mean you are probably right, I think I came by a survey that showed that the concern is higher in "wealthier countries"

What more interested in is if people are just against AI itself, or just worried about how it's being developed and deployed.

Besides, "the worried west" also probably takes up the majority of the AI usage.

verdverm•27m ago
China is on pace to process the most tokens this year last I saw

The interesting aspect of The West is a large portion of people are using it, liking it, and fearing it all at the same time

Zeruxe•22m ago
I mean I definitely see your point of view, I just don't think those things are VERY contradictory. You can find it useful while still being concerned about its long-term consequences.

I think people or rather especially Engineers are just afraid to fall back and not be able to catch up if they completely drop AI. Which is why they use it even though some of them might not be very willing to.

Im curious to know if people that fear it, also don't want to see the development go well, or if they are still for the development. Perhaps the former right?

verdverm•11m ago
as an engineer, you cannot not use it because

1. adversaries will, ai catches human error in review, you put others at risk by not using it

2. companies are asking and not hiring ai negative people, it's changing our profession and they don't want luddites

Zeruxe•4m ago
1. To answer your first point, don't get me wrong again. I understand what you mean by catching human errors and review. But it also opens other doors to "ai problems". AI definitely introduces it's own errors, there are cons to using it not only pros.

2.But that's exactly my point, Engineers feel forced to adopt AI to remain competitive, but high adoption rates in engineering professions don't neccesarily mean positive attitue towards it. The companies just want shipping..shipping.. They don't even care if the engineers understand the concept of what they're building.

I feel like the use of these habits will be biting them in the butt a few years ahead.. people should really be worried about these new workflows more than what they currently are - do I make sense?

nperez•30m ago
I don't think it's a binary. Even among people who are pro-AI, there are uses of AI that almost everyone is against. I doubt most people have a problem with a lightweight model that runs on a laptop and does grammar checks, but models that are wildly energy-inefficient or used for war + crime + scams are a different story.
Zeruxe•26m ago
That's fair. A lightweight self-hosted model can't be so harmful(yet).

Perhaps more about the huge frontier models being developed at openai or antrophic.

Or perhaps the controversial stuff being associated with Palantir.

People are starting to ask questions, I mean a lot are just worried, I had so many people tell me they were pro-ai a few years back, but now they just have that worried face whenever you mention it.

lf88•10m ago
I agree. I am extremely worried about the development of frontier AI models. I would like to see an immediate stop of further developments of such models and a permanent, global, ban on superintelligence.

On the contrary, I think that less capable models could be used for several, largely positive, applications.

I also think that narrow AI models developed for specific scientific applications (e.g., protein folding, weather predictions...) are in general beneficial for humanity.

Zeruxe•2m ago
sorry but are we really gonna be calling it superintelligence now ? haha

I totally agree with the benefits of the smaller models, but it's the large frontier models, potentially or accidently removing the security barriers from those can cause things far worse than the "hugging face" incident..

orionblastar•24m ago
I am for AI, but it is a puppet come to life like Pinocchio, and needs a Jiminy Cricket for a conscience. The AI needs morals and ethics; otherwise, it causes trouble and bad results.
Zeruxe•20m ago
but then, who is to program these so called morals and ethics? I feel like there would be an unavoidable BIAS when integrating morals into it..
lf88•4m ago
This goal seems flawed to me. There's no universal agreement on "morals and ethics". Superficially people may agree on some general principles, but if you go into the details you'll likely find substantial differences.
Zeruxe•1m ago
totally! and this is what I think can be really dangerous if we try to implement such things trying to make it "conscious".
lf88•19m ago
According to all the recent polls the vast majority of the population in the western world is worried about AI and wants stricter regulations. I would say it's about time!
Zeruxe•17m ago
If this is true(which I hope it is) it would certainly be calming, not because im against it totally.

I just think turning the blind eye will hit us like a big truck in a few years.. It really is about time..

strken•12m ago
If AI was a presidential candidate, it would be in trouble.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/712751/americans-cool-toward.as...

BugsJustFindMe•2m ago
> What do you guys think?

There are three important analytic boundaries:

1) Some people are less employable right now because of AI.

2) The limit approaching everyone else will be less employable in the future because of AI if it keeps progressing (this includes even manual labor eventually), and we have no reason yet to believe that it won't keep progressing.

3) AI might suddenly stop progressing for unpredictable reasons, but right now that doesn't seem likely.

The thing to worry about here isn't AI. The thing to worry about here is a society that has no plan to stop forcing everyone to labor to eat while simultaneously devaluing their labor.