I can understand the no automated AI contribution point of view, but going overboard with the above that is also completely unenforceable makes the policy look dumb.
A project without everyone putting the same filter between them and the work they submit might help a project evolve in interesting and different ways.
Sources:
Sick of Andrew's arrogance. It's pervasive in the little clique of software heroes who are the only ones who get to touch his precious codebase now, along with the fratboy culture of contempt which always accompanies that kind of behavior.
Of course it's being cargo-culted by the embedded group, how else are they going to get Senpai to notice them.
Doesn't bode well for things going forward. Fortunately Zig was mostly done before AK started disappearing up his own posterior, so it's just a case where we'll have to accept a good language with some bizarre warts, rather than the truly excellent one it was shaping up to be.
So it goes. Good luck with that steel drivin', John Henry.
Indeed no hard feelings.
Tiberium•16m ago
Tiberium•11m ago
> Yeah we know you're working with an LLM. That is fine (imo), as long as you're not doing drive-by slop PRs. These have been rather good quality, and you've been testing on hardware (which is important)
So it feels odd for them to suddenly change from this (clearly working) setup.
paaloeye•10m ago
Tiberium•8m ago