The article goes out of its way to say how bad Grokipedia is at the thing its supposed to be good at ("facts") and then says Wikipedia should copy some of the things it does.

I do not understand.

> Musk’s encyclopedia also has a playful spirit that Wikipedia could learn from. Grokipedia’s homepage features random samples of recent edits that provide a glimpse at how the site is being improved.

I invite the guy to discover https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ARecentC..., which is prominently linked on every page!