Imagine if open-source organizations other than the Linux Foundation (and Mozilla I guess) could throw $1.2M of API-rate LLM usage at security.
*buries head in sand*
*cries*
Is the kernel simply too complex to reason about? Is it an underlying flaw in the security model or language implementation?
Should we assume that all software is more compromised than the kernel?
We developed AIs that can find them.
dangelosaurus•45m ago
And we're hiring! https://openai.com/careers/search/?q=cyber
BoppreH•34m ago
I understand this work was based on a dated snapshot. Will there be any continuous effort, scanning new PRs as they land, to prevent new weaknesses from being added?
ky1ebot1337•4m ago
farisght•22m ago
A system that admits THOUSANDS of such vulnerabilities is certainly flawed in several fundamental aspects
konaraddi•18m ago
E.g., 948 results is a high number to review in a timely manner unless your team is very large or spending several months combing through the results
EDIT: nvm i shouldve kept reading, answered
> At this scale, manually investigating every report is impractical for our research team. We therefore focused on validating findings that a) were reachable by a low-privileged user, b) required no special capabilities, and c) produced measurable evidence of memory corruption.