"Our admixture dating analysis points to events far back in time, suggesting a more heterogeneous spread of pastoralism and food production in the Sahara compared to Morocco and East Africa"
Generally speaking, people move around and are promiscuous. Staying isolated for that long implies a physical barrier, because cultures generally don't survive for 40,000 years. But an isolated population means genetic issues - but if the population is big then they should have spread at least somewhat.
Click-baity title?
7000-year-old-skeletons-from-the-green-sahara-reveal-a-previously-unknown-human-lineage-
While magic requires mystery, mystery does not require magic and they are not synonyms. It is perfectly valid to state something is a scientific mystery without implying magic is involved in some way.
begueradj•3d ago
Animal husbandry was a response to unproductive hunting. And since desertification - hence unproductive hunting- started long time ago in Africa, it makes sense that animal husbandry started there too before it appeared elsewhere.
dani__german•3d ago
HelloNurse•3d ago
psunavy03•3d ago
detourdog•3d ago
My question is what was the divide that kept these groups at 50kyo. Something kept them apart.
I hope they get samples from different beings to analyze.
mannyv•3d ago
Tuna-Fish•3d ago
The surprising news is that the spread of animal husbandry didn't seem to accompany the spread of human genes -- the subsistence strategy was adopted by learning, not by people moving.
I don't think this is very shocking because the same thing seems to have happened elsewhere. While agriculture mostly spread by people moving, the culture that developed into all the pastoral cultures of the Eurasian steppe seem to have been hunter-gatherers living in close proximity to farmers.
MichaelZuo•3d ago
jjk7•3d ago
You don't have to prove something that doesn't exist. Find the evidence, and prove it does.
Tuna-Fish•3d ago
This evidence is found everywhere. But it's dateable, and you can find the oldest instances of it in the fertile crescent.
MichaelZuo•2d ago
throwee2000•2d ago
MichaelZuo•2d ago
You cannot prove it didn’t happen, and I also don’t think it was that likely. Both can be true.